you are correcttelcoman wrote:Hillary is not going to be indicted!
you are correctBe careful what you wish for because Bernie is getting closer to the White House door.
you are correctThe young college educated just becoming new voters are going to profoundly change this country.
you are correctThe GOP is not attractive to them with their present platform.
i love how liberals spin things. let me break this down:The GOP is restricting and making voting more difficult is red states where there is no evidence of any voter fraud.
really? take a peak at your democrat party's accomplishments:The GOP is not an attractive party to anyone with a decent education and follows politics.
as obama is attractive to mostly uneducated, uninformed ghetto thugs and socialists.Trump is attractive to mostly uneducated,uninformed, bigots, and racists.
So how did these people obtain social welfare benifits if they are un-IDable? Come on man, you dont really think im that stupid right? If illegals can get a drivers license or legal ID, why cant "urban black" US citizens?Bubba1 wrote:Evidently not you or me as we both have a driver's license and/or passport. Not everyone has them. But here's a few for you that would be surpressed: thousands of urban Black or Hispanic citizens who don't drive, (most of whom happen to be registered Democrats, and these are Republicans sponsored bills), elderly people on fixed incomes who can no longer drive, and therefore no longer have driver's licenses, and might have trouble going to the extra lengths and/or cost to obtain what are being proposed as proper "legal" ids), people with suspended drivers licenses. Give me time I'm sure I can come up with more.. There's no disputing it's a partisan suppression tactic, as there are RNC members that have confirmed it on video. The voter id laws is one of the rare subjects where I agree with Howie.
No, I don't think you're stupid, but I do have a feeling you haven't read that much on the subject, and might be shooting from the hip. Listen, Urban does not mean people on welfare. You're the one making that leap. But since you brought Welfare recipients up, you would think if someone can get on Welfare, that id should suffice to identify themselves when voting. BZZZT. Nope. Under the proposals, those id's are unacceptable. Kinda silly, don't you think? which is yet another reason why these proposals are suppressive.ImStricken06 wrote: So how did these people obtain social welfare benifits if they are un-IDable? Come on man, you dont really think im that stupid right? If illegals can get a drivers license or legal ID, why cant "urban black" US citizens?
No, I don't think low of blacks or hispanics. We're all Americans. I could just as easily ask if you blindly accept anything your political party of choice feeds you. If any id could be used to confirm voter identity, there would not be an argument. The problem is the Republicans proposals seek to limit the type of id's that are acceptable. The idea is to make it inconvenient for those without those specific id's to exercise their right to vote, and it's no coincidence that it impacts Democrats far more than Republicans. And to make matters worse, there are RNC folks that have gone on record and admitted it, yet many people continue to deny it's voter suppression. I find that more sad.ImStricken06 wrote:Democrats have little no faith in hispanics & blacks. You guys think they are all to stupid, and unable to go get a legal ID only card from a state agency. Too poor or 'lost' to get an ID card; but somehow they get out to get food, fuel, drugs, cigarettes, alcohol, clothing, welfare programs, etc. You cant tell me they lost all their info and are unble to be ID'd. Do you really think this low of blacks & hispanics?
This we agree on. I think it's crazy, and both political parties are doing it. Heck, Chris Christie recently signed a bill that gives illegal aliens in-state tuition rates. That means illegal aliens pay less to attend a NJ state college than a Pennsylvania US citizen. WTF!!! But giving illegals perks like a drivers license or tuition discounts do not necessarily kill the integrity of our voting system, as they cannot vote unless they're registered, and only citizens can register to vote. It's not the vast liberal conspiracy you think it is. For the voter id laws, it's more of a Republican party conspiracy if you insist on putting a label on it. I have no doubt if most blacks and Hispanics registered as Republicans, the Democrats would do something equally sleazy to suppress their votes. That's 21st century American politics. But what I think kills our integrity is that we keep re-electing the same bums who keep doing stupid things like that. We need term limits.ImStricken06 wrote:Seriously, how do non-speaking illegals get a state issued id, yet american citizens cant get that same id to vote? Why should we Kill the integrity Of our voting system to "help" those who cant even get an id
ImStricken06 wrote:I lived in nyc- West 6th & ave p in bay ridge, bk. I have family there. Heck i have 70yr old family off the boat, and all have legal state issued ID's.
My GF's sister lives in bk, and never owned a car - but has a license just for ID reasons.
You're right, not all nyc residents own cars- BUT almost all own a city/state issued legal ID that states: "ID ONLY". Nj does the same thing. People own these to get into bars, to get an JOB, apartment, to qualify for social programs, etc.
So Dems supposedly worrying about a tiny select few who cant get their life together to get a state ID is nothing more than BS; its the illegal vote you guys want. Dems should be honest- they'd get respect.
Seriously, how do non-speaking illegals get a state issued id, yet american citizens cant get that same id to vote? Why should we Kill the integrity Of our voting system to "help" those who cant even get an id
ImStricken06 wrote:Ps: i dont blindly eat whats being fed to me by repubs. I dislike both parties. I happen to come from a butthole country that to closely resembles the failed political goals of democrats: government dependency & pandering to a base most likely to need/want more government intervention into basic needs.
feel free to to jump in. criticizing someone without offering any alternative views is a baseless ad hominem post.mixeds14 wrote: lmao @ lot of ur comments.. u really need to do some searching on some of the things u say before u comment because it just makes you look bad (being nice here).
you've read a posts of mine, and through your own preconceived notions on Conservatives, cant believe i dislike both parties.mixeds14 wrote:ImStricken06 wrote:Ps: i dont blindly eat whats being fed to me by repubs. I dislike both parties. I happen to come from a butthole country that to closely resembles the failed political goals of democrats: government dependency & pandering to a base most likely to need/want more government intervention into basic needs.
Again some of your comments say the opposite.
Lol, Don't have to, just go back and read some of your comments and what others try to say..ImStricken06 wrote:feel free to to jump in. criticizing someone without offering any alternative views is a baseless ad hominem post.mixeds14 wrote: lmao @ lot of ur comments.. u really need to do some searching on some of the things u say before u comment because it just makes you look bad (being nice here).
no I have read all post on all pages and there a lot of valid points including some of your own, but Again, ur putting blame on a single party when BOTH parties have a fair share of guiltyou've read a posts of mine, and through your own preconceived notions on Conservatives, cant believe i dislike both parties.
im pro abortion.
im pro making companies & super wealthy pay a 'fair share' of taxes, etc. why should a $12/hr employee pay more taxes than the CEO?
im pro-personal pot use. (even thought i hate intoxicants)
BUT im not for destroying a nation via open boarders, IDless voting, sanctuary cities, delete our culture & rich history, bend over backwards to outsiders, stomping on the American flag, etc; because somehow, within the democrat party; its become popular in the last 10 years to be embarrassed to be "American".
when it comes to the voter topic, yes i dont see the democrats side of it. but otherwise, i blame both parties as to why this country's going down.mixeds14 wrote:no I have read all post on all pages and there a lot of valid points including some of your own, but Again, ur putting blame on a single party when BOTH parties have a fair share of guilt
I understand were u coming from, but one thing u don't understand is that an illegal cannot and will not vote, they will not take that risk and the politicians know this. the law is mostly towads its own citizens. hell in nc now days u cant even get cable without being a legal resident, u being from another country should have an idea on this stuff.ImStricken06 wrote:when it comes to the voter topic, yes i dont see the democrats side of it. but otherwise, i blame both parties as to why this country's going down.mixeds14 wrote:no I have read all post on all pages and there a lot of valid points including some of your own, but Again, ur putting blame on a single party when BOTH parties have a fair share of guilt
remember, im a conservative; not a republican. i come from a country (Russia) where government destroyed life. they enacted communism & socialism. Russians learned really quickly that a government big enough to give you everything you want or need, is big enough to take it all away too. so in my book: the less of these rat bastards (both republicans & democrats) the better. the less law makers, politicians, etc = the easier & freer our lives will be. the part where i start to distance myself from democrat/liberals/progressive views is where they have this insatiable desire share this country with anyone who walks in, anyone who doesnt want to work & contribute, anyone who refuses to accept the American language/culture/life-styles, anyone who demands America cater to them, etc.
im sorry man, i dont agree with Democrats pandering to the illegals by promising virtual amnesty, and then creating laws that will help an illegal (if he/she chooses to) to vote via not requiring legal ID's. i work to darn hard to support career-welfare recipients who refuse to work, and the democrat party protects the abuse. i work to darn hard to support walking paychecks (children created just to qualify for social benefits). i work to darn hard to have my money go towards bail-outs of millionaires who squandered money they were trusted with. i work to darn hard to have to pay for college loans i didnt sign up for. i work to darn hard to be forced to buy a product (obamacare) when maybe im deciding to opt out for a year on medical coverage (if the people wanted it that bad; you wouldnt have to force them to buy it!). i work to darn hard to be told that social security wont be there when i retire. i work to darn hard to just give away money to the children of illegals in the form of social benefits(only the children qualify). i work to darn hard to be told i owe those who make less, some of my paycheck because "its only fair". im to nice of a person to be told that im a racist, if i disagree with the black lives matter, or obama, or if im a conservative. its not fair if im passed up on a job offer, just because im white (affirmative action, etc). Its not right that New Jersey State Police just had a whistle blower state trooper come out and state that they were forced to 'over-look' felonies, criminal background, gang-ties, etc on black applicants while white guys get the shaft for a JV simple charge because they needed to boost the black rank. :end rant lol
No, not that amazing considering the RNC candidates Obama faced. Obama's margin of victory in those two elections was by more than the 5% of Democrat votes the RNC hoped to suppress with the new voter id laws. These suppression tricks could have played a factor had the vote counts been closer as they were, say, in the Bush-Gore election. But the answer here is not to loosen any existing laws. The answer is simply not to implement any NEW voter id laws at all. And since there were no voter id problems in the last two presidential elections, exactly what kinda problems are these new voter id laws supposed to fix?ImStricken06 wrote:Its amazing how enough democrats came out to vote in obama, twice, without any ID issues. But now, we need to loosen the laws due to "voter suppression".
you're wrong. many heavily-controlled democrat areas are specifically pandering to illegals. not only through rhetoric and promises, but also through making it easier for them to vote. if our own nation can have "sanctuary-cities" - dont tell me, that voting is some how off the table.mixeds14 wrote: one thing u don't understand is that an illegal cannot and will not vote
you cant be that naive, to think that illegals are these law-abiding residents who fear the law. they certainly didnt fear the law, when they crossed that boarder or overstayed their visa. illegals create a decent portion of the crime in this country. dont act like they are hiding in fear.they will not take that risk and the politicians know this.
i understand the democrats dont want to loosen any laws. and thats the point, as the current situation is to lose to maintain the integrity of the voting system. the current situation is allowing, or at the very least creates an opportunity for illegals to vote.the answer here is not to loosen any existing laws. The answer is simply not to implement any NEW voter id laws at all.
Oi, I think you've veered off on a tangent. Here's the deal in a nutshell: The topic is the new voter id laws being proposed, which has NOTHING to do with illegal aliens or their path to citizenship or their right to vote. All these laws are supposed to do is require ALREADY REGISTERED VOTERS to prove who they are when they show up to vote, by showing some sort of id. That by itself is not a big deal, but the RNC is proposing very specifically as to what type of ID is acceptable, hoping to make it enough of a pain in the arse for anyone that doesn't already have that type of id to make them question whether voting is worth the extra hassle. Make And it's no coincidence that most of the REGISTERED VOTERS that don't have these id's are registered Democrats. We're not talking illegal aliens here. Now, since there have been no significant problems of voter id fraud in the past especially during presidential elections, that means the integrity of the voting system is fine, and these new voter id rules are completely unnecessary. "It's that simple."ImStricken06 wrote:[i understand the democrats dont want to loosen any laws. and thats the point, as the current situation is to lose to maintain the integrity of the voting system. the current situation is allowing, or at the very least creates an opportunity for illegals to vote.
we must understand that the USA is in a brand new situation that we have never faced before; so its time we adjust the rules to vote to keep undocumented residents from voting. We have millions of residents (undocumented aliens) that want to have their voices heard. they want it heard in a way that will allow their wives, children, and relatives to cross over. they want their voices heard so they can stop 'hiding'.
if we have never been down this road before, then we must adjust. its that simple.
you're wrong. many heavily-controlled democrat areas are specifically pandering to illegals. not only through rhetoric and promises, but also through making it easier for them to vote. if our own nation can have "sanctuary-cities" - dont tell me, that voting is some how off the table.ImStricken06 wrote:mixeds14 wrote: one thing u don't understand is that an illegal cannot and will not vote