The Mic wrote:No.

CNN Article wrote:Drug-resistant HIV strain alarms officialsNew York man developed full-blown AIDS within months

Saturday, February 12, 2005 Posted: 0417 GMT (1217 HKT)

(CNN) -- Health officials in New York City are alarmed after a man infected with a highly drug-resistant strain of HIV progressed to full-blown AIDS within months of diagnosis.

That raises the possibility that a hard-to-treat variant of the virus could be spreading among gay and bisexual men who use the drug methamphetamine.

"This case is a striking reminder that the risk of getting infected with HIV has not gone away," said Dr. Jay Dobkin, director of the AIDS program at Columbia University.

"In fact, risky behavior may be even more dangerous now since there is a change of infection with a virus we may not be able to treat," Dobkin said in a press release from the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

The department has issued an alert to doctors and hospitals to check other newly diagnosed HIV cases to see if they are also infected with the drug-resistant variant.

Health officials also are monitoring laboratories for additional cases.

"This case is a wake-up call," Health Commissioner Thomas Frieden said in the release.

The man, in his mid-40s, had not previously been treated for HIV. He was diagnosed last December and his infection appeared to be recent, health officials said.

He reported having multiple male sex partners and unsafe anal sex, often while using a crystallized form of methamphetamine, known as "crystal meth."

The man's HIV strain proved to be resistant to three of the four available types of antiviral drugs used to keep HIV in check.

While patients being treated for HIV do develop drug resistance, finding such resistance in someone who has never taken HIV drugs is "extremely rare," according to the city health department.

Even more alarming to health officials was the fact that the patient has already progressed to full-blown AIDS -- something that typically takes more than 10 years after initial HIV infection.

"In this patient's case, onset of AIDS appears to have occurred within two to three months, and at most 20 months, after HIV infection," the health department's statement said.

Noted AIDS researcher Dr. David Ho, director of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center in New York, said the case "is alarming."

"While this remains a single case, it is prudent to closely watch for any additional possible cases while continuing to emphasize the importance of reducing HIV risk behavior," Ho said in the health department's press release.

Public officials have long expressed concern that gay and bisexual men were abandoning safer sex practices, particularly the use of condoms during anal sex, that successfully reduced the spread of AIDS in the 1980s and 1990s, before antiviral treatments were available.

Contributing to their concern is the increased popularity of crystal meth, which can impair judgment and heighten sexual sensation.

"The rapidly growing crystal meth epidemic in New York continues to play a significant role in facilitating the transmission of HIV," said Dr. Antonio Urbina, director of HIV education at St. Vincent's Catholic Medical Center in New York.

"Health care providers must be especially vigilant in not only recognizing and diagnosing HIV infection, but also in recognizing the signs and symptoms of crystal methamphetamine use in their patients," he said in the health department's release.

scs13 wrote:i think they shoulda named it extra not good aids, super just sounds too nice

The Mic wrote:
Extra and good are also nice words. So I nominate the name PMQ in it's place. I'm sure the World Health Organization will thank me for my efforts in the fight against Super Aids prevalence with this very repulsive name; because I'm pretty sure no one wants PMQ in them.

CybeRise wrote:New aids?? cool less people in those lines at disneyland!!!!

Most of us will be ok unless you have:

(a)Unprotected sex with a prostitute(b) Unprotected Gay sex(c) Share needles with other druggie losers(d) like Ryan Seacrest

Wikipedia wrote:Unprotected receptive sexual acts are at more risk than unprotected insertive sexual acts, with the risk for transmitting HIV from an infected partner to an uninfected partner through unprotected insertive anal intercourse (UIAI) greater than the risk for transmission through vaginal intercourse or oral sex. According to the French ministry for health, the probability of transmission per act varies from 0.03% (meaning 3 in ten thousand) to 0.07% for the case of receptive vaginal sex, from 0.02 to 0.05% in the case of insertive vaginal sex, from 0.01% to 0.185% in the case of insertive anal sex, and 0.5% to 3% in the case of receptive anal sex

The Mic wrote:Actually those are the correct figures, the WHO is cited as a source. Jimmy you interpreted the information wrong, if you look at the groups Cyberise mentioned, they allude to the figures you've provided.

and yes the AIDS pandemic is widely exagerrated, I suspect it's a ploy on Christianity's behalf to scare people from having sex.