Where would be the best source to find out what the gap needs to be on the spark plugs? Per the manual it says to not gap them and because of this I could not find specs for this.Ludeaem wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 7:51 amWell, going back to basics you need 4 things to start a car. Air, Fuel, Spark, Compression. I've done this job and still have a vacuum leak I need to address in which I bought a smoke machine. I would suggest you gap those plugs. I never trust the pre gap BS. Takes a handful of seconds to double check and make sure you have the right gaping tool so you don't break the electrode/s.
What codes are coming up? Have you scanned it?
Thanks! This helps a ton. Will update this thread tonight on my results.VStar650CL wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:27 pmThe trigger wire (pin 3) will be the only wire that's a different color on each coil in the bank. All coils are WHT/RED for power, BLK for ground. Here are the trigger colors:
#1 WHT/RED
#2 RED/BLU
#3 GRY
#4 WHT/RED
#5 GRY/RED
#6 VIO/WHT
#7 BLU/RED
#8 GRN/RED
Y33TJPN wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:43 pmVStar650CL wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:27 pmThe trigger wire (pin 3) will be the only wire that's a different color on each coil in the bank. All coils are WHT/RED for power, BLK for ground. Here are the trigger colors:
#1 WHT/RED
#2 RED/BLU
#3 GRY
#4 WHT/RED
#5 GRY/RED
#6 VIO/WHT
#7 BLU/RED
#8 GRN/RED
This corrected the no start! I had managed to switch adjacent ignition coils on both banks IE 2<->4 6<->8 1<->3 5<->7. Followed the above (with the #1 Yellow/Red note following) and started up like a charm. That being said is there anything I should further investigate given I cranked it multiple times (10 minutes or so of a few cranks every minute) with the wrong firing order in place?
Y33TJPN wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 9:44 pmContinuing to work out the kinks, I know I’m close to getting this thing back to daily driver duty.
After I connected the connectors to the right coils I started it up and had no SES/CEL and no unwarranted lights besides the air bag indicator (that’s been there since purchased). At this point I didn’t get to test drive it or let it idle for very long as I was technically on the clock
I came home and was excited to start it up again, double checked to make sure everything was connected and tight and turned it over and the AC fans immediately came on, which hasn’t happened before. Also ran codes and had 3 codes - P0115, P0325 and P0330 - looked in the engine bay again and realized the knock sensor connector was unplugged. Phew.
Still trying to troubleshoot the P0115 for the ECTS. Little backstory is when purchased my car had a single prong ECTS (part #25080-89907). The prong had broken off so I ordered a replacement (part #25080-89903 as it was something I could pick up same day and not delay starting further). This replacement part is technically for a 300zx but I took a chance as I figured they look and serve the same purpose.
In the manual it advises troubleshooting methods but they all revolve around the coolant temp sensor part 22630-ED000 And this is a multi prong connection. Any idea why mine came with a single prong and how to trace what could be causing this code? Infiniti parts deal states my sensor part # is for “ FED. S + CAL. S, S” but doesn’t list any production dates. If someone could decode this that would be helpful - I’m assuming FED is federal and CAL is California but not sure how that correlates to my MY.
If I’m reading the manual right my car is in failsafe mode and since it is receiving either very high or very low voltage from the sensor or it’s connector it is essentially guessing at what the temp is and adjusting the gauge based on the amount of time since the ignition has been turned to start. I pulled the car out of the garage and the gauge got all the way to the line before the “H” in my travel of less than a half half mile and very little idling prior to departure. It seems that’s not accurate unless something is very wrong with my cooling system.
As always - any assist is appreciated!!!!
This is what I’m thinking. I’ve already ordered the correct part # based on IPD diagrams. Is there a way to test the resistance of my current sensor and compare it to new? Seeing a difference would definitely give me peace of mind. Would it just be one multimeter lead to ground and one to sensor to measure OHMS?VStar650CL wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:18 pmDefinitely sounds like a wrong/bad temp sensor or a bad gauge.
Went ahead and followed the above and am feeling pretty safe I do not have cooling issues but instead have a fault sensor or gauge as suggested. Measured temp with infrared at cold, idle and after 10 min idle + 1 mile round trip and despite my gauge saying I am about to explode my temp after turning car off and letting it sit for a couple minutes was 95.5 from a 80.4 degree completely cold engine which sounds much more spot on to how the gauge reflected prior to this tear down.VStar650CL wrote: ↑Sat Apr 10, 2021 1:17 pmGet a laser thermometer and shoot the area near the OE temperature sensor. If the gauge says overheat but the laser says normal temperature, you can be sure the gauge or sender is faulty. It's probably the gauge. The sensors are simple RTD's, resistors that change value with temperature. When they die, they almost always flatline. The gauge pegs the needle, usually at the Cold end, and doesn't move. Problems with inaccurate display are far more likely to be a faulty gauge.
I'm not sure that's accurate - if the thermostat is stuck closed coolant would still circulate through the engine and heater core, so having hot air inside doesn't indicate a properly working thermostat.cbird805 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 11:44 amA good indication whether your engine cooling system is working properly is to turn your heater on full, and see if you are getting hotter than ambient temp air blowing. As counter-intuitive as it may seem, it indicates that coolant is recirculating and that your thermostat is working properly.
You're correct, that's inaccurate. It does tell you the water pump is working and that the coolant level is high enough for flow, but doesn't tell you anything about flow through the radiator.
Second that. Rated temp on a 'stat is where it should crack open, full flow temp will be 3~5 degrees higher. So, for instance, a 180 'stat should generally keep the engine at 180~185. These guys would know better than I would, but I think your 'stat should be higher than that. Keep in mind that running cold will give you a tiny bit more power but will accelerate engine wear, depending how much colder you're running. Ring and piston wear at 90F is 8 times greater than at 180F on a typical engine.
Most of the dyno tests I've seen show very small gains, but no more than a few hp even on big powerplants. You're absolutely right about the open loop, and constant rich running will also contribute to engine wear by gradually polluting the oil.Ryantzer wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:21 amThere is really no power gained with a lower temp thermostat - the lower coolant temp has no effect on the intake air temperature, which is the only area where lower temps would be a benefit. Reducing the coolant temps by 15 degrees is going to have zero effect on the combustion chamber temperatures, which are in the thousands of degrees.
The thermostat wasn’t changed by myself and no record of it being changed by a shop. The owner before me wasn’t sure how to change the battery so I’m confident he didn’t touch anything related to the cooling system. Of course could have been changed before him but the car looked overall untouched mechanically.
I think the OP means heat transfer, Jay. Glycol has crappy heat transfer characteristics, that's why Nissan will void a CVT warranty if there's higher than 50-50 in the cooling system. Straight glycol will reduce cooling capacity by as much as 25% and actually freezes higher than 50-50 does. Straight water provides the best transfer but of course boils, so 50-50 is simply the best compromise. However, none of that should affect the temp at which the 'stat opens, so I doubt that's why the OP is running cool. If the 'stat is the correct temperature then you're quite right, some sort of bypassing is the likely culprit.