Lightweight FlyWheel - myth?

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
EZcheese15
Moderator
Posts: 6518
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:40 pm
Car: 2012 Juke SV
2011 Titan Pro-4X
2007 BMW 328i
Location: St. Charles, IL
Contact:

Post

The only "torque" you loose is launch torque. That's something you don't need on a roadcourse. Ever see a pit crew pushing a car out of the pits to get it started? That's because the flywheel is so light they can't even get the car to start moving.

I honestly can't think of a reason that a heavier flywheel would *not* benefit your 1/4 mile time.

The only thing is this:A lightweight flywheel *will* show a small gain of HP on a chassis dyno because it is less rotating mass. However, the question is this, which is better? Less Rotating Mass or a Higher Moment of Inertia? I suppose this is why some people see 1/4 mile benefits and some people don't. I would imagine the less powerful the car is, the more the rotating mass makes a difference. On a higher power car, the benefit of that extra 2 HP is overcome by a large moment of inertia of the flywheel which can greatly increase launch time.


cdlong
Posts: 885
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 1:56 pm
Car: '95 240sx

Post

you guys need to study physics a little more.
EZcheese15 wrote:The reason you lost time on a 1/4 mile is because the lighter flywheel has a lower moment of inertia. When the car is revved at the start, you increase the inertia. A lighter flywheel has less of an increase, while a heavier one would have more of an increase.

When the car is launched, with a HIGH moment of inertia, the inertia of the flywheel actually helps to accelerate the vehicle faster because the engine has to do less work to get the car moving. With a lighter flywheel, and LOWER moment of inertia, the engine has to work harder to accelerate the car. For this reason, a Pro Drag racer will opt for a HEAVIER than stock flywheel.
the additional inertia you can store up in a flywheel isn't enough to really move the car. and any power you put out after the launch goes into accelerating the car and the flywheel. heavier flywheels are better for drag racing (to an extent) because it makes launching easier. it smooths things out, helping you maintain traction.
240marcuSX wrote:ive always figured that a lightened driveshaft would be just as beneficial but less detrimental
the benefit of a lightweight flywheel is also it's disadvantage. if it accelerates (spins up) faster, it will also decelerate faster. the same holds true for everything, driveshafts, brake rotors, anything with mass (though this discussion is about rotational inertia).

User avatar
EZcheese15
Moderator
Posts: 6518
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:40 pm
Car: 2012 Juke SV
2011 Titan Pro-4X
2007 BMW 328i
Location: St. Charles, IL
Contact:

Post

cdlong wrote:you guys need to study physics a little more.

the additional inertia you can store up in a flywheel isn't enough to really move the car. and any power you put out after the launch goes into accelerating the car and the flywheel. heavier flywheels are better for drag racing (to an extent) because it makes launching easier. it smooths things out, helping you maintain traction.
No, it's not enough inertia to *move* the car. However, the inertia that is stored when the flywheel is spinning in neutral transfers throughout the drivetrain when the clutch is engaged. The inertia from the flywheel does *aid* in transfering the inertia to the wheels. Because of this, the engine is required to do LESS work to get the car moving. I never said the inertia in the flywheel would *launch* the car, I said it would reduce the work load on the engine during launch, which in turn allows the engine to utilize it's power to increase the inertia of the vehicle even more.

User avatar
D-UNIT
Posts: 787
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 10:37 pm
Car: a 91' S13 (15.014 @ 94.56mph NA) KA-T

Post

EZcheese15 wrote:The only "torque" you loose is launch torque. That's something you don't need on a roadcourse. Ever see a pit crew pushing a car out of the pits to get it started? That's because the flywheel is so light they can't even get the car to start moving.

I honestly can't think of a reason that a heavier flywheel would *not* benefit your 1/4 mile time.
What about when going up hill?

Full race cars don't have a lot of torque yes , but at the start of every race they actually do a standing start. I've even seen them do burnouts and doughnuts. But your right about drag though. I was watching HP TV and they were selling "race " flywheels starting at 25lbs all the way to 50lbs!! V8 of course.

I'm guessing here , but I think lightweight flywheels are more crucial to perfomance in NA cars than turbo cars ( note my friends times in the first post).

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

Actually, it's momentum, not inertia, that is crucial. Semantics. But yes, a heavier flywheel naturally has more mass which allows you to store more potential energy. When you release the clutch you use some of this energy combined also with some output from the motor to get the car moving. A lightweight flywheel will have less stored energy to begin with so you end up needing more output from the motor to get it started in the same manner. This will actually require more throttle modulation. In drag racing, if you have the right set-up, a light weight flywheel can get you down the strip faster. Since a function of the momentum you need to get the car is also the speed of the flywheel, you can simply rev higher. If you're tires are sticky enough to hold the road, a simple drop-clutch start will get you out of the hole quite quickly. Coupled with the lower rotational mass, and in the case of a turbo car, slightly better turbo spool, you might shave a few tenths off. But it wil not be comfortable trying to drive your car like this in traffic or from light to light.

User avatar
Dattebayo
Posts: 33288
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 10:04 am
Car: 2004 Nissan Frontier Desert Runner
Location: NE DC

Post

Couldnt you fein rotational mass by simply using a dense material as a ring with spokes design flywheel instead of just a solid design?

Nismo_Freak
Posts: 10314
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 10:42 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX

Post

2BN_S13 wrote:Couldnt you fein rotational mass by simply using a dense material as a ring with spokes design flywheel instead of just a solid design?
You would negate the benefit of the lighter wheel by doing that.

User avatar
skydragoness
Posts: 9394
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 6:49 am
Car: 03' 350z Touring 6spd
92' 240sx 60k survivor :)
Location: North DFW, TEJAS
Contact:

Post

Whoa.This is interesting to me, I bought a Fidanza a year and a half ago. I do some autoxing, but the car is also a daily-driver. Should i sell my Fidanza then? I don't want my car to suck more than it already does, and i was thinking of going with a RPS or ACT clutch to go with the Fidanza. Argh.

colies97~240sx
Posts: 958
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2002 2:11 pm
Car: 1997 Nissan 240SX - Black

Post

sky, i wouldnt go selling it, unless you are wanting to make it a drag car... of if you race people off the line at stop lights all the time i am completely happy with mine as a daily and have no regrets about getting the fidenza. and as i understand a lightend flywheel is good in track events like autox ect.

nab911
Posts: 2438
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 9:33 am
Car: 93 Nissan 240SX SE

Post

The only reason why a lightwheel fw wouldnt be good is when you are shifting. If you get up to 6500 in one gear and you dont shift fast enough the revs could drop below what they should be matched to in the next gear, thus the car would slight slow down to match the motor. If you shift fast enough, you can let it out with the revs higher than the transmission speed, thus giving the car a quick boost while it tries to catch the motors revs. Its all in the wrist... and the hips


Return to “General Chat”