just got back from dyno

[1SlowCA18DET]

3in turbo back, 11lbs of boost, hard pipes and a front mount, So what you guys think 197.9hp and 194.7tq(don't know how to post pictures)
Modified by 1SlowCA18DET at 6:43 PM 9/16/2005

[float_6969]

If that's on a stock CA turbo, you're not doing bad at all! Congrats!

[1SlowCA18DET]

yup stock ca turbo

[8ggalant]

nice numbers congrats

[fanta]

8) What type of dyno? Corrected numbers?

[1SlowCA18DET]

the type of dyno that is in ground, don't know correct name.It was at a mustang shop

[rexhunta]

the type of dyno that is in ground, don't know correct name.It was at a mustang shop

Yeah, i wouldn't mind knowing what dyno, and what boost controller your running.. have you been remapped ? cause that sounds a bit too high too me with just the mods you have said..

Pete

[themadscientist]

CAs have no torque

[1SlowCA18DET]

i using a homemade mbc and a safc

[rexhunta]

i using a homemade mbc and a safc

Hmm.. My only reasoning is, i have the same mods and only done 171rwhp.. same as all my friends, i've never seen a CA go higher 11 pound then the 170/180 rwhp range.. usually with an sr t25 they get up around 200 but thats with around 13 pound screwed in..

good on you though, you sure it's stock innards ?

[1SlowCA18DET]

complety stock that i know of

[rexhunta]

complety stock that i know of

Wow,musta been a sort of freak thing, as i have never heard of them flowing that much from the little turbos.. congrats

[boost_boy]

3in turbo back, 11lbs of boost, hard pipes and a front mount, What so you guy think 197.9hp and 194.7tq(don't know how to post pictures)

I think that's pretty good considering the mods you have. Congrats................

Dee

[cortina-mk1]

it hasnt been asked ..yet butis that rear wheel power?

majority quoted in the UK is always estimated flywheel power...so i just had to ask

[c-rad]

If it was a "Mustang" dyno, then those numbers aren't quite accurate as they tend to read about 10% higher than the Dynojets.

[rico05]

Damn. I need a MBC and SAFC now. My goal for stage 1 is 200rwhp. I'm very impressed and jealous!!

Just wondering, how much did you need to increase the duty cycle to keep your AFRs clean at 11psi? I wonder if I would need to go even more at 10psi seeing as I have an SR T25G...?

[NeedCAforS13]

If it was a "Mustang" dyno, then those numbers aren't quite accurate as they tend to read about 10% higher than the Dynojets.

which would put him at 178hp and 175ft/lb. more similar to my dynojet reading.

[Ca_laurier]

nice numbers, i wish I could have gotten my car dyno'd this year but i never got around to it.

but it was a wee bit faster than a ca powered silvia boosting 13 pounds

[knightrider]

CAs have no torque

when i dynoed my car, right before i seized it i got 190 rwhp and 218 ft/lb of torque at 15 psi on a SR t25, fmic, and stock exhaust. just gotta mess with timing and fuel. you can get torque. btw this was on a dynapack, which is supposedly the most accurate, it doesnt have the flywheel affect of roller dynos.

[NeedCAforS13]

stock exhaust

that probably helped out with torque figures too

Sean

[Nowhere]

e-mail the picture to me, I'll post it.bik3r (a)(t) yahoo (dot) com

[1SlowCA18DET]

you got mail

Yes rear wheel hp

[Nowhere]

Wholy crap AFR!!Nice run!

Open for all to comment!

[rexhunta]

Whats with all the dips ?? The AFRs are pretty much like my dyno reading, except on the lower revs i was around 13, and dip up to about 10.8, this was on a dyno dynamics.

Can anyone tell what sort of dyno that is?

[1SlowCA18DET]

its a dynojet

[rexhunta]

its a dynojet

Awesome, so all you have to do is wrinkle out the little bumps, and it'd be a good tune ! excellent work

[1SlowCA18DET]

the dips are from a leak in the intercooler pipes which have ben fixed(a very small leak

[rexhunta]

the dips are from a leak in the intercooler pipes which have ben fixed(a very small leak

good good good, thats good to hear

[float_6969]

the dips are from a leak in the intercooler pipes which have ben fixed(a very small leak

Damn MAFS systems....

[boost_boy]

Wholy crap AFR!!Nice run!

Open for all to comment!

This dyno run was done on 12psi of boost with a couple of leaks in the intake manifold and even one before the T-body and at no time did I see such a wicked graph. However, I'm not going to question anyone's hypothesis, but when you see squiggly lines like that, it's more from ignition woes (ie plug gap, too much timing) unless you have a major leak and that would seriously affect power and the graph. It seems as if your plug gaps are too wide for the amount of fuel and boost you were flowing and ultimately be wasting your time and money on the rollers session.

When i tried to sneak in some extra timing, the lines got a bit squiggly like yours. But nonetheless, I'm impressed with what you got out of what you got. Thanks for posting your info and we look forward to seeing you put up even better #s in the near future.

Dee