Post by
biosehnsucht »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/biosehnsucht-u13953.html
Fri Sep 02, 2005 4:25 pm
heheh
CA oil pans are better jacking points than the subframe..
they flex less
unless you want extra capacity, its not really going to be an issue. and you can always do like sideways danny
so you think the CA is inferior in some ways, feel free to name them.
timing belt vs timing chain, so much easier to deal with
most spare/replacement parts are domestically available
brute force oil pan
iron block!
direct acting hydralic lifters (none of that silly rocker arm one lobe actuating two valves BS), good for 8000+ rpm daily driving (altho to breathe up there and actually make power you'll need afermarket cams), and easily upgraded to solid lifters (Tomei makes kits)
easy injector and MAF upgrades and rom tuning thanks to top feed injectors (RX7 and DSM upgrades are usable) and simple ECU w/o need for daughterboards that can be retuned for many size injectors and other nissan MAFs easily
if you want to see what the CA is capable head over to SXOC.com and see what them crazies in Europe are up to.
now, what does the SR have over the CA? its more cheaply built? oops, sorry, thats in the CA's favor.. oh, it has almost 200cc's more displacement ! OH NO!! bigger stock, still crappy turbo? OH NO!!