To be clear, any spring and shock/strut arrangement where the coil spring is located on the shock/strut itself is technically a coilover whether it allows for height adjustment or not. The term has become used incorrectly and has become widely accepted as such. Not that I'm trying to a stickler for this, but given the Z's rear suspension set-up where there is not an actual coilover of anykind.
ldstang50 wrote:Hey man, I don't run coils, but the factory strut had to bolt somewhere. Shouldn't the coilvers just bolt in there and the factory spring perch is left open
The Z doesn't use struts either. Struts are locating members of the suspension, where as shocks are not. Basically, if you removed a strut from a car equipped with it, the spindle will simply hang by the lower control arm. With a shock, you can remove the shock and the suspension will still travel according to the intended geometry.
I haven't really paid much attention to what is out there now, but what I have seen is just essentially the threaded collar portion used with an adjustable perch with a spring on top in place of the original spring. They keep the shock separate.
Such a setup you describe might be dangerous (coil-over shock in the rear). The shock's mounting points will likely have been tested and perhaps built to handle the loads seen by a shock. As a shock in such an arrangement is not going to see nearly the load a spring will, it may not be able to handle it. Even if it could hold the weight, however, its possible the chassis may flex more than it should.