It's easy to see why they quite making the J and why you don't see many 96 and 97s.Victor wrote:Found this info in the "Standard Catalog of Imported Cars".
1993 - 214981994 - 227771995 - 178991996 - 75641997 - 4594
For most years that the Q45 and J30 were both sold in the U.S., The J30 outsold the Q45.
There is a difference in a typo and not really knowing.yodawill2000 wrote:LMAO Had that coming Scott ole' boy !!! hehe
-- Ouch. Have to take it take it either way though, because you sure can dish it out. I feel you though, just last night, my VP used 'dominate' when he meant 'dominant', and it was on a slide! I seriously have issues with being told what to do by someone with sub par usage and grammar, but I somehow refrained myself from correcting his error. Biting my tongue was tough, but not having made a fool of my superior probably helped my career, albeit passively.gr8scott72 wrote:There is a difference in a typo and not really knowing.
Scott met 200,000 miles at 99.8 mph, replaced an injector and topped 1,000 posts and has left the building, or is now at least taking a very well-deserved break?SilverJ30t93 wrote:Okay,
So I think I may have upset Scott with my above post. It was just a joke and I wouldn't have posted it if I hadn't seen where he'd done the same to others. That said, I apologize.
I'm here, quietly lurking as always until I see something to speak up about.GerryO wrote:
Scott met 200,000 miles at 99.8 mph, replaced an injector and topped 1,000 posts and has left the building, or is now at least taking a very well-deserved break?
It takes much more than that to upset me. I've learned to be able to take it as much as I dish it out. No apology needed.SilverJ30t93 wrote:Okay,
So I think I may have upset Scott with my above post. It was just a joke and I wouldn't have posted it if I hadn't seen where he'd done the same to others. That said, I apologize.
Just becuase I don't post all the time doesn't mean that I am not here.yodawill2000 wrote:Glad to see you back Scott Ole boy.I too was worried about your absence.
This board is usually pretty slow and VERY slow without your input, wit and observations, but that's a good sign too that we all have lives apart from the forum.gr8scott72 wrote:
Besides, this board has been SLOW the last week or so.
On a side note, my Durango now out pulls my truck even tho the truck has 100 ci (7.5L vs. 5.9L) MORE than the Durango. I just got the rear gears swapped from 3.55:1 to 4.56:1, had a leaf spring added, and have a rebuilt transmission with beefy guts and a shift kit. It now barks 2nd HARD. It's a towing machine and it sure is nice to be back in a vehicle with A/C.
I'd say it was a combination of many factors; J30s were comparitively expensive to make and buy new, were expensive to maintain after the warranty period expired, didn't exactly fit the needs/body size of many people, the styling didn't appeal to everyone, they aren't great on gas, they are rear-wheel drive. And word probably got out/they may have announced that the model would be discontinued in late '95 or '96. The later years don't have the HICAS system either, but that could also be just one less thing that can eventually fail.Al Dave wrote:Can some one please give some hint on why it dropped on 95 and then took a big slump in 96 97. What is the difference....any best kept secrets ?
Full size sedan with NO truck room, NO rear seat head room, NO rear seat leg room, and TERRIBLE gas mileage to name a few.Al Dave wrote:Can some one please give some hint on why it dropped on 95 and then took a big slump in 96 97. What is the difference....any best kept secrets ?
How would they have made it bigger? By reducing the size of the fuel tank? If anything had to be sacrificed, I'm glad it was trunk space.naladude911 wrote:ya seriously, i cant go to costco without putting stuff in my rear seats lol. Why the hell did Nissan make the trunk so small?
By not designing a car with the tank between the seat and trunk?GerryO wrote:
How would they have made it bigger?
But then it would be more like every other car, and probably longer, wider, higher in the rear and heavier too, or front wheel drive and not as crash-worthy.gr8scott72 wrote:
By not designing a car with the tank between the seat and trunk?
(Like every one else does and does just fine too.)
There are certain shoes that I have that I actually have to take off to be able to fit my foot between the brake pedal and the transmission tunnel. lol (size 13)yodawill2000 wrote:Guess I'm glad I'm a short dude Spacious for me !! Nuk Nuk
I'm 5' 11", 195 on a good day with shoe size about 10 1/2. I ONCE gave my boss a lift (he asked for it) in my J30. He's about 6' 5" and 340 lbs, and has ridden in smaller cars, but...gr8scott72 wrote:
There are certain shoes that I have that I actually have to take off to be able to fit my foot between the brake pedal and the transmission tunnel. lol (size 13)