No need to spray the headbolts.nismo_chk wrote:ok great.. thanks alot guys.. looks like as soon as i get the head checked out.. ill be spraying the gasket.. are you guys saying to spray the head bolts as well or not?
Dee
No need to spray the headbolts.nismo_chk wrote:ok great.. thanks alot guys.. looks like as soon as i get the head checked out.. ill be spraying the gasket.. are you guys saying to spray the head bolts as well or not?
Most people want immediate response from their engines and feel that they can possibly get a better kick out of the CA18DET by raising cylinder pressure via a change of pistons. Ryan or float_6969 knows 1st hand that this is a tricky ordeal. Timing in this case is key and will make or break this high compression and turbo combination. No matter what we do, the CA18DET is a turd under 3000rpm, so I took advantage of that 1000-3000rpm laziness and added a turbo that doesn't start kicking butt till around 3500rpm till redline. But for autoXers, they see the turbo/high compression thing as assistant in achieving their goals.CA19DET wrote:i believe on the copper spray thing for re-used metal gaskets, on my first assembly, my HKS 1.6 (3 piece metal) had a coating, but when i re-used it you can see it was gone in places, we cleaned teh surfaces and sprayed it with copperspray.. its sealing perfect, seen 20psi, T3/T4E stock slugs and rods
slightly off topic: why do all the high comp, cams, intake, exhaust end use a tiny turbo?? get a bigger GT25/28 (GT2871R ) sized turbo or T3/T4 hybrid and get the better response from the high comp and better numbers/power..
I am curious why you say that.float_6969 wrote:Knightrider, from experience, don't go with the 10:1 unless this is going to run race gas only.
with 9.5:1 on my CA, I can't run safely run more than about 20* of total timing @ 7psi on 91 octane fuel. It doesn't detonate all the time, but will occasionally. Granted this is a rough tune, and I still need to get to the dyno, but I would think 10:1 would be considerablally worse.Coldspawn wrote:
I am curious why you say that.
With bolding that, how do you know you are not adding too much timing? When I say that, I mean. There is a point where you not making power and it is before the knock threshold.float_6969 wrote:with 9.5:1 on my CA, I can't run safely run more than about 20* of total timing @ 7psi on 91 octane fuel. It doesn't detonate all the time, but will occasionally. Granted this is a rough tune, and I still need to get to the dyno, but I would think 10:1 would be considerablally worse.
The thing about timing is this. Most people do not understand what timing actually is. They say "more boost, less timing" or "more compression, less timing". That is true, but they do not understand why that is so.float_6969 wrote:I'm not saying that you CAN'T run 10:1 w/boost on pump gas, you'll just have to pull a lot of timing out of it. The 10:1 would make for a nice low end on the CA though. I know that it's a night and day difference with the 9.5:1, but the CA is still kinda gutless down low, it's just tolerable now...
Better fuel curve? Fuel should be only used as a "coolant". The richer the mixture, the colder the cylinder temp. That is saying the ignition timing is tuned correctly.float_6969 wrote:PS-I've currently got it tuned to run about 15* of timing @ about 7psi, but this is a VERY conservative number, and I think with a better fuel curve, I could run 17/18* on pump gas.
Be sure and call me personally when you're done and don't pop the motorfloat_6969 wrote:I'm ready for it. I can't wait to get full power out of this thing. I'll do my best to get some video, and definatly pics and dyno sheets.