I disagree, but that's a matter of personal taste.powergrip wrote:I'm getting the Sedan. It just looks way better
There's a reason for that.powergrip wrote:and there are fewer on the road.
Check and mate. :P But you are right it is a matter of taste. One thing I noticed at the dealership is that they had about 100X more hatchbacks then they did sedans. Oh well. I'm going tonight to seal the deal and see if I can drive away my new SL! 3 hours to go for my first new car. WOOT!matt_a wrote: I disagree, but that's a matter of personal taste.
There's a reason for that.
Good luck with the dealership.powergrip wrote:Check and mate. :P But you are right it is a matter of taste. One thing I noticed at the dealership is that they had about 100X more hatchbacks then they did sedans. Oh well. I'm going tonight to seal the deal and see if I can drive away my new SL! 3 hours to go for my first new car. WOOT!
The hatch is cheaper, I just hate those back lights. The design itself isn't bad. Just the lights. Other then style is there any major difference between the 2 regarding performance? I know the sedan is about $500 more expensive.fastlyfe wrote:I am 6'2" I fit in the back of the hatch. Who drives amicro sedan? The mini,Honda fit,yaris and scion xa are all hatches. U won't be sorry. I go to homedepot and have put plants to furniture in my car. The delay is a sign to buy a hatch. LOL
overlays give the lights a different lookpowergrip wrote:
The hatch is cheaper, I just hate those back lights. The design itself isn't bad. Just the lights. Other then style is there any major difference between the 2 regarding performance? I know the sedan is about $500 more expensive.
You'll have to pardon my lack of knowledge on after market car parts. What exactly are "overlays" and how does one acquire and install them. (Well not so much acquire cuz I can probable google that) but are they hard to install on your own?bulld0g wrote:overlays give the lights a different look