Post by
MrPresidentQ45 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/mrpresidentq45-u81868.html
Thu Nov 29, 2007 8:04 pm
I'm trying to sort out a suspension setup for my 240, and from every thread I've looked in so far (here and on other forums) it seems to be that:1. If you spend less than $1,000 on a coilover setup (K-sport, etc.) , you might as well have taken your money, thrown it on the ground and lit it on fire. And then P***** on it.2. If you want to build any sort of track car (weekend), either man up and spend at least $1,500 or more on a high-line model set-up from a known brand (Tein, Cusco, etc.), or run some sort of shock/sleve top mount combo that costs as much or more.3. (and this is me) While personal preference with regards to ride quality is a given, there doesn't seem to be an answer to the basic everyman question, which (reading between the lines and bad english) seems to be "I want my car to sit lower and handle better than stock. Will coilovers (by brand, or in general) accomplish this, or is there a better suggestion (upgrade struts and springs)?"
I'm not talking about shock dyno testing (saw that on zylvia) or even "what does the seat of YOUR pants say?" but has anyone run a track car in a controlled environment (say, a road course) and then improved the suspension, resulting in a reduction in lap time or some other measureable event?
From personal experience on other vehicles basic things like bigger swaybars, stiffer springs and "performance" shocks (anything other than stock is performance when you're dealing with 60's suspension) reduce body roll (and increase ride harshness) and generally allow the vehicle to handle better up to the limits of the tires. I would imagine the same applies here. What results have others had and with what setups? Sorry about the run-on Kerouac sentences, I'd just like to avoid wasting my cash on a setup that does nothing.