You must have missed this part...R350Zz33 wrote:those are #'s on a na motor the motor has been stroked but its na i believe
Keyword - spool. Regardless of missing that you should know better that you're not going to squeeze close to 600HP out of a 4.2InjectedPerformance wrote:The slight loss at 4500rpm can be attributed to the later spool on that pull.
R350Zz33 wrote:well ive seen companies de-stroke turbo motors has somthing to do with make them spool up quicker
R350Zz33 wrote:it makes no sense to me to stroke a motor for turbo they usually stroke them if they are doing a full na build sorry i did miss that word.
R350Zz33 wrote:well ive seen companies de-stroke turbo motors has somthing to do with make them spool up quicker
Great now i need to go change my pants
LOL. I agree it is a pretty sweet ride. 700whp on pump gas is pretty amazing.snwbrdr435 wrote:
Great now i need to go change my pants
Gains are heavily dependent on supporting modifications. It would be impossible to give a universal answer that it would provide X amount of a gain. However, FI engines do notice significant more gains than anything NA will. If you are considering this, shoot me an email with other modifications you have done and I will try to pull up a relevant dyno chart.orangeNblue wrote:so how much power did it yield on N/A motor?