BREAKING NEWS! Nissan GTR Engine Revealed

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 71063
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 S13, 92 SE-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

JustinStrife wrote:
Don't get butt-hurt Greg.
No butt-hurt involved, brotha.

We all know you own a 'vette. We hear about it a lot.

Incidentally, I spent some time on the track with a C6 2 weekends ago. Not impressed. Neither was the owner, who couldn't shake me (relative amateur) through the twisties.

But this isn't a thread about GTR (which will be here sooner than you think) vs Vette (which is still plagued with QC issues).

If it was, I'd have mentioned the disparity in build quality, power-to-weight ratio, F/R balance, antiquated leaf spring suspension, and the superiority of AWD.

But we're buds, and I'd never do such a thing...



User avatar
Gold Digger
Posts: 7345
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:48 pm
Car: Current:
2011 Infiniti G25X

Former:
1995 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec Midnight Purple
1990 Nissan Laurel Club S Turbo Two Tone Pearl

Post

MattB wrote:Awesome engine specs. I still don't understand why it's being badged as a Nissan though.
Why would it not be? I don't see any Infiniti Skyline GT-R's in Japan, so I think it's only fitting that the GT-R carry the Nissan badge. The only other franchise name to have a Skyline was Prince Motor Company, and guess who bought them out? Nissan.

The GT-R, since the first Hakosuka 4 door in 1969, has always been a Nissan.

What I don't understand is, why drop the Skyline name from the GT-R. From it's inception, it has always been a Nissan Skyline GT-R. But, I guess this is ol' Carlos' bag of tater chips, so it's his call.

And Justin, man, dude, seriously, stop with all the "the Corvette is the most superior car ever built" routine. Yeah, for the price, the Vette is pretty bad ***, but it's not the end all/be all of the sports cars. I hear that this other car called a Viper is pretty shibby, too.

I mean, hey, aren't we here to praise cars in general? I understand that everyone is opinionated, but you don't have to shove yours down our throats. Ease up a tad man.

User avatar
DJButton
Moderator
Posts: 5605
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 6:38 pm
Car: 2010 Nissan 240sx
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Post

Hopefully these will actually sell in the US though, I can't wait to meet an unsuspecting owner armed with more knowledge about his car then he has!

Well I honestly have more fun driving my RB then the C6 stockers, I think mainly because hp is not considered when driving the dang vette just plain sucked to me, akward as heck. Anyway, the new Z06's are indeed a blast and def very fast, but I prefer some higher revs, and again, a very akward car to drive, i.e. backing up etc. I love the ls combined with the CTS-V though, freakin blast to cruise in, yet not the fastest thing ever even with that amazing 400 freakin hp <---Sarcasm! Yes I have driven LS1/2/3/7 cars, immpresive but certainly beatable, and my contribution to this thread has been made worthless by clogging it with GM jargon... I feel ashamed... GTR's rule!

User avatar
fourLUG_hero
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:14 pm
Car: NJ, the place where people know
Contact:

Post

Twin turbo 3.8 V6 pushing nearly 500 horsepower with a redline of nearly 8000 and a torque curve of a train. Oh wow, I think I need a new pair of pants.

I would let these guys PIIMB for this car.

User avatar
Urabus GodofTraction
Posts: 6178
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:36 pm
Car: 2002 WRX Wagon, 2004 SV650, 1988 Land Cruiser, 1994 XR600R

Post

ishkabibble wrote:Looking forward to a Top Gear episode about the GT-R.
It will be interesting, seeing how Clarkson loathed the 350Z, and generally has nothing good to say about the rest of Nissan's lineup (and rightfully so).

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 29308
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

Vette eh, yawn, don't need it, my pen15 is impressive enough. GT-R, meh, it's fugly, I don't care what it has or what it can do. Kind of like Jenna Jameson with Rodney Dangerfield face.

BOOMSHAKALAKA
Posts: 5611
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 5:18 am

Post

C33LaurelRacer wrote:I hear that this other car called a Viper is pretty shibby, too.
Vipers are teh sechs.

ka24destructor
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:53 pm
Car: pignose hatch

Post

Loki wrote:That'd be a lot of modifications, and absurdly expensive. I just don't think it's worth it on a 240. Maybe a Z32, but JUST barely. Vette engines seem to be comparable, so it's like, why not just go with that?
yea i see what yall mean i realize it would be too much work/time/money than its worth, and unpractical when the money could be put into a different swap or modification that would yield just as good if not better numbers. the idea behind what i was tring to say is that it would be nice to enjoy such a nice powerband in a 240.

User avatar
bone_stock_240
Posts: 3467
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:50 am
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45

Post

Where is this info from? Sounds positively sweet!

User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14966
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: 95 S14, 08 CL9, 08 NPS50, 03 Ninja 250, '60 Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

SEV6 wrote:Does anyone know what the sticker on that badass is gonna be?
I've heard $58k for the base model, which would be a serious bargain for what is essentially a bonafide 997 911TT competitor, if not an outright superior vehicle.

In regards to bashing the base C6, it lapped VIR faster than the R8 and 997TT in Car & Driver's recent test, and so it is undeniably a very fast car on twisty roads, any fault is the driver's.

That does NOT mean that it is somehow superior to a car that isn't even on the market yet. The GTR is a very different animal from a Corvette, and it's impossibly silly to try and compare them and declare one or the other the victor.

Some people have a definite preference for AWD vs RWD or NA vs FI, etc... It's like comparing a Ford GT to a 997TT. You know you're either going to buy one or the other, few people who actually intend to DRIVE the car hard are going to cross-shop very intently.

Both cars will represent the two greatest performance bargains on the market, if not EVER.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 71063
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 S13, 92 SE-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

^ Well-said.

User avatar
JustinStrife
Posts: 5120
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 10:13 pm
Car: '99 FRC. 402, Vortech T-Trim @ 12psi = 706rwhp/621rwtq
Contact:

Post

AZhitman wrote:Incidentally, I spent some time on the track with a C6 2 weekends ago. Not impressed. Neither was the owner, who couldn't shake me (relative amateur) through the twisties.
Many questions I've been pondering today. What year and model C6 did the owner have? Auto or Manual? What suspension package did he have? What mods? What mods do you have on your G35? If he had a base suspension setup, I could see you hanging with him, but if he had the Z51 package, then your driving abilities were superior to his. What tires were you both running? Lots of info missing here.
AZhitman wrote:If it was, I'd have mentioned the disparity in build quality, power-to-weight ratio, F/R balance, antiquated leaf spring suspension, and the superiority of AWD.
Power to weight Ratio, the Corvette wins. At least the 08+, or Z06. F/R Balance, I'm sure both cars are close, as C5 and C6's have the transmission mounted in the back to keep weight relatively balanced. Antiquated leaf spring suspension? That's up for debate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corvette_leaf_springs

I see 'modern' suspensions, and the suspension used in newer corvettes as both having their strengths and weaknesses.

I really like what Nissan is doing with this engine. When I say competition, what I really meant was, competition between the big guns that are out there, for my next project(which I am building to beat up on GT-R's, Z06's, Vipers, and Porsches, while looking good and being a Street Car in the process). It won't be a Corvette either. My C5 has been assigned Daily Driver duty, and I have another car lined up that will become my Frankenstein/experiment.

I love the performance wars that are going on right now, as it will cause all of the car companies that are involved, to be competitive and get better with their designs and the technology used. I can't wait for the GT-R, the Blue Devil, the new Hyndai Tiburon RWD, a possible return of the S-Chassis, and AE86 model, and others that will be joining the fray. It is a good time to be a car enthusiast again.

Keep me updated Greg.

To the guy bashing me about my opinion on Corvettes, you obviously don't know me that well. I've never said the Corvette is the best car ever made end of story. I'm saying, it's very comparable, and has set some baselines this decade, for other cars to follow. It's a great platform to work on, and has one of the best engine systems ever made(that you can't argue with). You have to have a baseline, to compare other cars to, or where do you stand?

And if I was going to build the most badass Street/Track car ever, it wouldn't be a Corvette. Too big and heavy. I want something that's less than 3,000lbs, and a bit smaller in width and length. And no, it's not a 240sx either.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 71063
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 S13, 92 SE-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

JustinStrife wrote:
Many questions I've been pondering today. What year and model C6 did the owner have? Auto or Manual? What suspension package did he have? WhatPower to weight Ratio, the Corvette wins. At least the 08+, or Z06. F/R Balance, mods? What mods do you have on your G35? If he had a base suspension setup, I could see you hanging with him, but if he had the Z51 package, then your driving abilities were superior to his. What tires were you both running? Lots of info missing here.
A year old, manual, Toyo T1-R's and no mods on the vette.... Supposedly has OEM adjustable shocks? (pics in the thread) He's not a "great" driver, nor am I - G35C 6MT, some suspension bracing, Toyo Proxes RA-1, headers / catback.

I was just really surprised I could hang with him in the twisties and he really didn't pull much on the straights - He said later that he was surprised as well, thought I was running FI. I kept a straight face and went "WOO HOO" after I walked away.
JustinStrife wrote:I love the performance wars that are going on right now, as it will cause all of the car companies that are involved, to be competitive and get better with their designs and the technology used. I can't wait for the GT-R, the Blue Devil, the new Hyndai Tiburon RWD, a possible return of the S-Chassis, and AE86 model, and others that will be joining the fray. It is a good time to be a car enthusiast again.
Damn straight!!!!

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 71063
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 S13, 92 SE-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

p.s. You're 100% on another point - The 'vette is kinda the "yardstick" that most measure against. If the powerplant wasn't amazing, we wouldn't be scarfing them up to put in an S-chassis.

User avatar
JustinStrife
Posts: 5120
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 10:13 pm
Car: '99 FRC. 402, Vortech T-Trim @ 12psi = 706rwhp/621rwtq
Contact:

Post

AZhitman wrote:p.s. You're 100% on another point - The 'vette is kinda the "yardstick" that most measure against. If the powerplant wasn't amazing, we wouldn't be scarfing them up to put in an S-chassis.
One of these days I'll drop by your house and show off my project once I get it going. I think you'll like it.

I'm having a brain-dead moment Greg. Is the GT-R coming out in 09'? The Blue Devil is 'rumored' for an 09' release. Though you know how that can be with car manufacturers. It's almost depressing how fast these factory cars are getting. Need more mods!!!

User avatar
Loki
Posts: 7653
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:27 am
Car: 1994 Nissan 240SX Convertible
2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser
2001 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning
Location: Detroit, MI
Contact:

Post

JustinStrife wrote:One of these days I'll drop by your house and show off my project once I get it going. I think you'll like it.

I'm having a brain-dead moment Greg. Is the GT-R coming out in 09'? The Blue Devil is 'rumored' for an 09' release. Though you know how that can be with car manufacturers. It's almost depressing how fast these factory cars are getting. Need more mods!!!
If I remember right, Japan is getting theirs by the end of this year and we get ours by spring or summer of next. Wouldn't be much of an 08 GTR if it was released right near/during 09 would it?

a_ahmed
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 2:09 pm
Car: 1991 240sx fastback

Post

My dream cars: z06, 911 turbo, skyline gtr.

I can't wait to test drive this.. but man itll make me dream of it every night and of course i cant afford it just as i cant afford a z06 vette lol.

Such an amazing car...

User avatar
MX-Ham
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 am
Car: 1991 Mazda Miata A-package / 1981 Dastun 210 Base

Post

I wonder what the specs/equipment is going to be like on a Nismo GT-R. *drool*

User avatar
f1seb
Posts: 1300
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2002 5:15 am

Post

Why does that Blue Devil look soooo very little updated? Why don't they just completely redesign the vette, change the look completely? Those original owners surely are going to be dead very soon and they wont be in the market for another vette. So why keep running with that same styling so long, best thing they ever did was to rid the car of the pop up lights but that is still too little of a change. For a car that hits 2009 it's too toned down on the cosmetic changes, I was hoping for something more. That rear end is still soooo damn huge.

MattB
Posts: 1298
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 3:07 am
Car: 2001 Infiniti I30A
Contact:

Post

C33LaurelRacer wrote:
Why would it not be? I don't see any Infiniti Skyline GT-R's in Japan, so I think it's only fitting that the GT-R carry the Nissan badge. The only other franchise name to have a Skyline was Prince Motor Company, and guess who bought them out? Nissan.

The GT-R, since the first Hakosuka 4 door in 1969, has always been a Nissan.

What I don't understand is, why drop the Skyline name from the GT-R. From it's inception, it has always been a Nissan Skyline GT-R. But, I guess this is ol' Carlos' bag of tater chips, so it's his call.
The Skyline name was dropped because it is now used on the overseas equivalent of the Infiniti G35.

As for why it shouldn't be badged as a Nissan, tradition or history shouldn't come in to play for the US market. There's never been a Nissan Skyline GT-R officially sold here, and apart from the enthusiast community most Americans have never heard of it. I don't see how Nissan thinks people considering a Porsche 911 or Corvette are going to walk into a Nissan dealership. Yes, Corvette owners go to Chevy dealers but "Corvette" is an established nameplate. "GT-R" is not. And like it or not a lot of Americans care about badge status. The level of service provided to Nissan dealers is also not intended for >$50K cars. The Infiniti nameplate is more prestigious, and its dealers provide better service.

User avatar
f1seb
Posts: 1300
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2002 5:15 am

Post

Not to mention that 95% of the American public has no clue about the true origins of Acura, Infinity and Lexus.

User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16326
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

thekage wrote:Why would it possibly not be badged Nissan?
I dunno why the hell they said that but it confuses the hell out of me. It better not be badged as an Infiniti, that's for certain (which we already know it's not). Infiniti builds luxury cars, not sports cars. Anyways the Z06 is a hard car to beat for it's price and to a certain point I feel FR > AWD. But at 500whp I'd rather have to fight with understeer than over in the rain

User avatar
Gold Digger
Posts: 7345
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:48 pm
Car: Current:
2011 Infiniti G25X

Former:
1995 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec Midnight Purple
1990 Nissan Laurel Club S Turbo Two Tone Pearl

Post

MattB wrote:
The Skyline name was dropped because it is now used on the overseas equivalent of the Infiniti G35.

As for why it shouldn't be badged as a Nissan, tradition or history shouldn't come in to play for the US market. There's never been a Nissan Skyline GT-R officially sold here, and apart from the enthusiast community most Americans have never heard of it. I don't see how Nissan thinks people considering a Porsche 911 or Corvette are going to walk into a Nissan dealership. Yes, Corvette owners go to Chevy dealers but "Corvette" is an established nameplate. "GT-R" is not. And like it or not a lot of Americans care about badge status. The level of service provided to Nissan dealers is also not intended for >$50K cars. The Infiniti nameplate is more prestigious, and its dealers provide better service.
OK...I see your point....to an extent. Yes, the GT-R was never marketed for a non-Japanese sale, but that's what makes this so good. You take the GT-R and market it for Nissan, and put Nissan USA into the sports car market full on. Infiniti sells luxury cars and the G35 (U.S. version of the Skyline coupe and sedan) but the GT-R is not a luxury car. It's a sports car with a history of being brutal. Nissan builds real world sports cars, Infiniti builds luxury sedans and luxury sports cars.

You are going to have your Nissan and Infiniti pureists slamming each other both ways over this, but in my opinion, the GT-R should stay with the Nissan badge.

User avatar
usdm_180sx
Posts: 744
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2003 5:50 am
Car: 1993 base model 240sx (s13)
Contact:

Post

The Skyline GT-R is a cult car. 99% of car enthusiasts here in the states know what it is. As a matter of fact, R32's R33's and especially R34 GT-R's are just as desireable because they were never sold here.

As far as having the general public consider the GT-R against the 911 turbo or Corvette, it's called GOOD MARKETING.

The GT-R has a rich heritage like the vette and 911. That would be a good place to start.

User avatar
DriftReadyS13
Posts: 823
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:52 am
Car: 92 s13 w/ sr20

Post

who do i have to sleep with to get one of these. rosie o donnell? roseanne barr? i could care less

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 71063
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 S13, 92 SE-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

The 'vette guys can ignore it...

They can keep going to the Chevy dealership....

...and then they can get pwned by one at the track or on the street.

All of a sudden, the styling and "cachet" of the 'vette will look dated and tired. Just watch....

User avatar
JustinStrife
Posts: 5120
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 10:13 pm
Car: '99 FRC. 402, Vortech T-Trim @ 12psi = 706rwhp/621rwtq
Contact:

Post

AZhitman wrote:The 'vette guys can ignore it...

They can keep going to the Chevy dealership....

...and then they can get pwned by one at the track or on the street.

All of a sudden, the styling and "cachet" of the 'vette will look dated and tired. Just watch....
Who's ignoring it?

Hell it's not even out yet.

User avatar
Onizuka
Posts: 8907
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 5:24 pm
Car: 91 coupe w/s13 SR20DET 89 hatch w/s14 SR20DE

Post

MattB wrote:The level of service provided to Nissan dealers is also not intended for >$50K cars. The Infiniti nameplate is more prestigious, and its dealers provide better service.
Actually, new nissans like all-options 350z roadsters, Titans and Armadas can easily top $50,000. I also wouldn't be surprised to see a gt-r based Infiniti in the future. Maybe not a strait up re-badge, but something based on the same drive train and architecture (like the relationship between the 350z and G35).

User avatar
usdm_180sx
Posts: 744
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2003 5:50 am
Car: 1993 base model 240sx (s13)
Contact:

Post

AZhitman wrote:The 'vette guys can ignore it...

They can keep going to the Chevy dealership....

...and then they can get pwned by one at the track or on the street.

All of a sudden, the styling and "cachet" of the 'vette will look dated and tired. Just watch....
If that were true then it would have happened when the 911 turbo or e46 m3 came out but people are still buying vettes

User avatar
JustinStrife
Posts: 5120
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 10:13 pm
Car: '99 FRC. 402, Vortech T-Trim @ 12psi = 706rwhp/621rwtq
Contact:

Post

S14SRPilot wrote:
If that were true then it would have happened when the 911 turbo or e46 m3 came out but people are still buying vettes
Also on the corvetteforum in the off-topic section the GTR IS being talked about. There's all sorts of opinions on it, some love it, some hate it, some are neutral. It's not being ignored. You'd be stupid to ignore a 480hp AWD TT system.

Every car has it's niche/cult following, and respectable markets.


Return to “General Chat”