LOL, everything you said here is nearly verbatim from the Acura's marketing handbook on the Acura's VTM-4 AWD system. Toyota says similar things about there's (based on sensor inputs, etc.). The Toyota system is actually quite nice; I hope the Rogues is as well.Eikon wrote:Brian, I would say that the Rogue is for you!
The Rogue's new intelligent all wheel drive system is really cool. I'm not aware of any other vehicle on the market that has the same technology.
Many of these car-based SUV's have very similar tech. They are FWD biased with multiple differentials that transfer power if any slippage occurs to other wheels. This was of course a great improvement in technology over the old all or nothing 4wd systems. The Rogue has exactly the same FWD biased system with Torson center and VLSD front and rear diffs that all the other competitors have. The Rogue will adapt to loss of traction in exactly the same way as the others. But, the Rogue has the scoop on the others by having a little extra technology...
The improvement in tech. that the Rogue has made is by implementing intelligence into the system. The Rogue is set up to predict loss of traction based on driver inputs and adjust traction ahead of time, based on the potential for slippage.
When are you most likely to lose traction?1.) Accelerating from a stop. If accelerating from a stop the system will automatically go to a 50-50 bias until cruising speed is attained. 2.) Cornering. Based on speed and angle of cornering, the system will transfer power to as much as a 70-30 split as you enter a corner.
In either situation, the system is designed to "be ready" before you actually lose traction. By implementing some intelligence into the system they hope to save people from accidents by improving a "reactive" AWD system into a "predictive" AWD system.
That only works at low speeds. It turns itself off if you go too fast. It's only intended for situations if you're stuck in snow or mud or something similar.Lightforce18 wrote:if u dont want to wait for the AWD to kick in itself. There is a AWD lock button that will keep AWD on always. But wastes more gas im sure.
I agree 100%. I remember when the first Benz ML320 came out, it had all this fancy 4wd technology and it got absolutely trumped off-road by every other vehicle with "inferior technology". I recall the 4Runner one the off-road part of the review and it employed absolutely 0 special/intelligent technologies. Just a straight 50/50 torque converter down the middle and a locking rear for when you got stuck. I had a 98 4Runner Limited and the thing was an absolute swiss-army knife off-road.exeunt wrote:Actually, instead of "predictive" I would almost say "preventative". Instead on relying on sensors to detect slippage, I'm pretty sure they have the AWD kick in as he mentioned during acceleration from a stop and cornering. In my mind this is less "predictive" and more preventative, because everyone knows that these are the times when your car is most likely to need the traction. In my mind, this might be a little less "intelligent", but that just means that it doesn't rely on magic numbers to try to determine when slippage might occur, but applies AWD when it knows you might need it.
I always get nervous when I hear about "intelligent" systems, and we start throwing around words like "predictive", because these things are very easy to claim and very hard to disprove in the marketing sense.
Yeah our MDX has that but it also locks the rear and front differentials which makes turning REALLY bad for the car. There are warning signs everywhere that says ONLY use the lock when you're stuck and turn it off immediately after you're stuck.Lightforce18 wrote:if u dont want to wait for the AWD to kick in itself. There is a AWD lock button that will keep AWD on always. But wastes more gas im sure.