Thanks, my Rogue's last few #s are 000655 so mine was produced within the first 1000 Rogues! Hopefully this is not a bad thing.MHmidhudson wrote:It's a matter of picking apart the VIN. Every position has meaning.
Here's a Nissan Frontier:1N6AD07W66C400112 1=USA N=Nissan 6=truck AD=Frontier V6 07=short-bed crew cab W=4.0L V-6 engine 6=check digit 6=2006 model year C=Smyrna, TN plant 400112=sequence number. The last six are assigned at the plant, and tell an experienced reader of VINs pretty much the day the vehicle was built. At the Smyrna plant, Nissan builds Altimas, Pathfinders, Frontiers and X-Terras. Pathfinder "last sixes" begin with 500---, Frontiers 400---, XTerras (I think) 600---, and Altimas (also a guess) 100---. A number like "100112" means it was the 112th Frontier built for the 2006 model year, probably a first-or-second day vehicle. The plant in Japan that produces Muranos also produces Rogues, and the Rogue got the "100---" sequence. Mine is "100246", thus is the 246th production Rogue.
Hope this helps.Mark
Congratulations! I agreethe Rogue is fun to drive, it will be interesting to get your thoughts on the Murano and Rogue.mag318 wrote:I bought my Rogue on Monday and got the SL AWD package, the color is black with a grey leather interior. The neatest option is the Bluetooth phone system, it was easy to set up and now I never have to touch my phone while driving. I think all vehicles should have this option. I've been driving a 2005 Murano SL which while more powerful I think the Rogue is more fun to drive. The paddle shifters really compliment the CVT transmission. I think that Nissan really hit a home run with this SUV. I'll post some photos when I figure out how to do it.
Take one for a test drive. I think you will be suprised with the pep of the Rogue and the smoothness of the CVT. I traded a 4cyl RAV for the Rogue for the interior, quietness, handling/comfort, legroom superiority of the Rogue. Now the RAV 6 cyl is a fine MPG/powerfull combination no doubt. But the 4cyl Rogue has plenty of power for my needs.Bob C wrote:You looked at all the same cars that I did. That said, I found the 4 cylinder Honda CRV did not perform well. I was thinking of getting the 6 cylinder RAV4. Are you happy with the 4 cylinder ROGUE? Presently I am driving a 6 cylinder HIGHLANDER and very happy with that. The CX7 4 cylinder at least offers the peppy Turbo BUT my wife does not like the ZOOM ZOOM noise from the muffler.I do not want to get the ROGUE(Not tested it yet) and feel it is under powered. Any thoughts?Bob
Addtional info for you from another review, link to the full review follows.Bob C wrote:You looked at all the same cars that I did. That said, I found the 4 cylinder Honda CRV did not perform well. I was thinking of getting the 6 cylinder RAV4. Are you happy with the 4 cylinder ROGUE? Presently I am driving a 6 cylinder HIGHLANDER and very happy with that. The CX7 4 cylinder at least offers the peppy Turbo BUT my wife does not like the ZOOM ZOOM noise from the muffler.I do not want to get the ROGUE(Not tested it yet) and feel it is under powered. Any thoughts?Bob