An attractive new GM that's not a Cadillac?!

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Cliff notes at the bottom for you lazy folk.

Volkswagen makes ugly cars. It's a fact. To some, it's part of their charm. To the rest of us, it's yet another reason not to buy one.Still, the Passat has always squeezed by just this side of tolerable. It's a decent looking car with some blemishes. The Phaeton, VW's paradoxical Little Engine that Shouldn't, looks like a Passat in a nice tux and wearing a bit of makeup to hide it's acne. And one of the most attractive features of that tuxedo is the roofline.

So it comes as little surprise that someone would eventually copy this work of art. And considering VW's track record, it is equally unsurprising that the copycat would do VW one better by using it to make a great looking car. There is a bit of surprise in there, though: in this case the copycat was General Motors. And the car is a mid size family front-driver -- the Camry-fighting Malibu.

Chevy's fifth-generation Malibu (which debuted in 2004) was an awkward looking beast. With bulging headlights, odd lines, and a strange combination of soft curves and sharp creases, it looked about like a mental disorder might if it were forced to take on a physical form.Even if the car had been a spectacular machine, it offered such an uncompelling blend of boring and unattractive that no one would have bought one anyway. What would the neighbors think, after all, when they parked their gold-package Camry next to it?So the Malibu's battle with Camry and Accord wasn't so much fought as forfeited. The ugly duckling soldiered on for 4 years.

Apparently, someone at GM recently found a brain rolling around under their bed, because the new Malibu couldn't have taken a bigger step away from it's predecessor. The '08 model is clean, elegant, tasteful, and yes, it incorporates that wonderful Phaeton roofline. And oh, the things that roof does for the car. When you see it drive past, you don't see another box on wheels. There are no coldly efficient door and window shapes haphazardly bringing together one of the most inherently awkward areas of a car. Intead, you see an attractive, thoughtful design that makes you wonder if this is really a Chevy or if someone is about to reveal a hidden camera and scream "gotcha!"

What exactly is it that makes the stolen roofline so special? It's the C-pillar, and the deck lid. Rather than the usual cacophony of lines, arcs, and glass that most cars wear in this area, the Malibu has artfully drawn rear door lines and a distinctive triangular C-pillar.But unlike Honda's failed attempts (The Accord bore the same scar for 9 years and two generations), the Malibu's roof doesn't cut sharply down at the rear. Instead, it continues the graceful arc back to the decklid, where barely noticeable buttresses help transition into the trunk lid without a hint of a crease. The pillar behind the rear doors bears no glass, and adds a tremendous amount of character to the car for such a small amount of space. The car's uniform, singular beltline helps bring the ensemble together. There's no clashing, no single point to snatch the eyes' attention away from the whole.

The front fascia is another area that finds all it's elements working together. There are no pointlessly scalloped headlights to be found on this Malibu. A horizontally split grille showcases the Bowtie badge proudly and is flanked by headlights that still manage to look modern and demonstrate the car's Chevy DNA without looking contrived or cliché--something the rest of the automotive world might take notes on.Doors are sleek and blemish-free, with no econocar moulding or senseless bulging to be found. There's a tasteful blending of the subtle wheel arches with the lower door and rocker panels, and the minimalism is bliss in today's world of attention-desperate bumps, bulges, and creases.The sides do bear one of the car's stylistic sins, though: fender-mounted side-repeaters. Another play stolen from the VW/Audi handbook, except this one has the distinct disadvantage of being a horrible idea from the start. Still, GM's interpretation is at least rectangular and stylized rather than a generic oval found in a hardware store clearance bin.

The Japanese and Koreans might want to take note of what GM has done here: they've taken successful cues from successful cars and combined them in their own work. But the difference is that the Malibu is no impersonator. It doesn't come across as a gaudy charicature. Instead, it may very well be the most successful melding of "the right stuff" in it's corner of the family hauler segment in years.

Pics:



Cliff notes:GM steals styling cues from VW's best looking, worst-selling car and makes an Accord/Camry fighter that's not just better looking than both Accord and Camry combined, but actually genuinely attractive.


User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

The big greenhouse, shape of the rear deck, and broad shoulders remind me very much of the 90-96 Q45, in a very good way.

The tasteful wheel arches are a nice touch. Not obscene like the 2007 S-class, but still big enough to give a somewhat muscular look.

The tail lights could use some life, but otherwise its a sharp car that casts a nice shadow. From what I've read, the only gripe is the absence of navigation.

I heard it drives nicely too. I'm starting to not recognize GM -- thats a very good thing.

User avatar
sbird1
Posts: 6211
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:47 am
Car: 2006 BMW 325i
Location: Savannah, GA

Post

NEED CLIFF NOTES!!!

Looks good, but it's still lacking style.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

sbird1 wrote:Looks good, but it's still lacking style.
Valid point (although I personally disagree that it's lacking style) but I would much rather have a car that looks good and lacks style than one that tries to hard or one that's so afraid of offending anyone that it's entirely anonymous and dull.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:
Valid point (although I personally disagree that it's lacking style) but I would much rather have a car that looks good and lacks style than one that tries to hard or one that's so afraid of offending anyone that it's entirely anonymous and dull.
The big grill look with a dark horizontal stripe reminds me of the current Audi styling. That and the taillights don't excite me. But overall not a bad looking car IMHO. The new 'Bu is getting a lot of hype from the automags where GM invests a lot of advertising dollars, so I'm going to reserve judgement until I test drive one. I do think it's very encouraging to see positive discussion about a GM model for a change.

User avatar
blindsnyper
Posts: 3016
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:33 am
Car: 2007 versa
Location: oregon

Post

look like it got rear-ended

NSR_s30
Posts: 15113
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 5:10 pm
Car: '99 Ford F250 7.3L Diesel
'71 Datsun 240Z
Contact:

Post

I think it looks ugly...

User avatar
Dittoz7
Posts: 17694
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 4:08 pm
Car: 1997 2f0WtY SE!
Location: Miami, FL

Post

Yup Back Need A Little Bit More Shape...

User avatar
thoroughbred3.0
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:56 am
Car: 1990 nissan z32 n/a

Post

ugly. and it reminds me of a camry which makes it that much worse.

User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

I absolutely love this car....and the high/short rear decklid looks sweet, IMO.

I think that the new Malibu will make a real marked impact on Accord/Camry.

For awhile, I honestly entertained buying one, but now I'm no longer really looking for any new car.

User avatar
DevilMB3017
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 7:25 am

Post

This is offical, I'm jumping on the GM bandwagon.

I test drove my Saturn Ion and bought it on the spot. If it's drivability is anything like other GMs, I'm truly going to like these cars...

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19003
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

I might like it if GM didn't bombard me with gay advertisements all the time.

But alas, they did, and I hate the car.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:I might like it if GM didn't bombard me with gay advertisements all the time.

But alas, they did, and I hate the car.
BUT ITS THE CAR YOU CANT IGNORE!!!

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

I think it's awesome that they make fun of their own car in the new Malibu ads (it's usually a late-90's Malibu or Cutlass being "ignored")

User avatar
JustinStrife
Posts: 5120
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 10:13 pm
Car: '99 FRC. 402, Vortech T-Trim @ 12psi = 706rwhp/621rwtq
Contact:

Post

NSR_s30 wrote:I think it looks ugly...
If somebody else wasn't going to say it, I was. I wouldn't buy one.

User avatar
gniknave
Posts: 4761
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 10:25 pm
Car: 2000 Audi A6 2.8 Quattro
2008 Honda Civic EX (Sedan)
Location: Newport, Kentucky

Post

That picture doesn't do the new Malibu justice. In person [especially in white] it's gorgeous. But even though I'm not a Passat fan, I still think the Passat looks better [in sport trim] and has more potential in the aftermarket world, especially if you do something about that awful chrome grille.

sport:




User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

it looks like a Fusion and a new Accord got down with each other.

I do like it that Chevy's making strides in improving their product.

User avatar
chitownguy
Posts: 1450
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 2:09 pm
Car: 74 260z and 85 325e

Post

The only thing that bothers me about the new Malibu is the massive front fascia and the plain flat taillights. Other than that it's a lot more bearable to look at than the new Camry's or the new Accords which try to look to much as the luxury car it isn't.

User avatar
Urabus GodofTraction
Posts: 6178
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:36 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX Wagon
2004 Suzuki SV650
1988 Toyota Land Cruiser
1994 Honda XR600R

Post

A recent car without a super-high beltline? FINALLY.

Note to soccer moms: Just because it's got the windows from a tank doesn't mean it's safe.

BOOMSHAKALAKA
Posts: 5609
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 5:18 am

Post

Yeah it's not the most attractive car out there but it certainly looks better than it did before.

User avatar
otterman
Posts: 3380
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:43 pm

Post

I didn't read the long post but I looked at the pics. I'm not a big fan.

Passat's look good though.

User avatar
blindsnyper
Posts: 3016
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:33 am
Car: 2007 versa
Location: oregon

Post

lolmudkipslol

User avatar
otterman
Posts: 3380
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:43 pm

Post

blind_snyper wrote:lolmudkipslol

User avatar
blindsnyper
Posts: 3016
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:33 am
Car: 2007 versa
Location: oregon

Post

otterman wrote:
your mom should have swollowed you

User avatar
otterman
Posts: 3380
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:43 pm

Post

blind_snyper wrote:
your mom should have swollowed you
Sorry, I'm not going to have a 1990's joke off with you.

User avatar
blindsnyper
Posts: 3016
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:33 am
Car: 2007 versa
Location: oregon

Post

otterman wrote:
Sorry, I'm not going to have a 1990's joke off with you.
go f*** yourself you little b itch.

User avatar
otterman
Posts: 3380
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:43 pm

Post

blind_snyper wrote:
go f*** yourself you little b itch.
Damn dog, I didn't know you're so hardcore. I'm gonna back off you before you trip.

(...that's sarcasm for: I can't believe i just got e-thugged...)

User avatar
blindsnyper
Posts: 3016
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:33 am
Car: 2007 versa
Location: oregon

Post

otterman wrote:
Damn dog, I didn't know you're so hardcore. I'm gonna back off you before you trip.

(...that's sarcasm for: I can't believe i just got e-thugged...)
rrriiiggghhhttt

stick to your fvckin 240 forums

notslow
Posts: 2762
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:40 am
Car: Nissan Sileighty
Contact:

Post

Huge step up for chevy for sure. As previously mentioned there are some adjustments that could be made but I still see this being a big seller.

User avatar
otterman
Posts: 3380
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:43 pm

Post

blind_snyper wrote:
rrriiiggghhhttt

stick to your fvckin 240 forums
How was that not being an e-thug? Whatever, General forums is a lot funner then the 240 forums cause I gotta be half way serious in there. Usually General doesn't have noobs trying to play forum nazi like you.

Anyways, I'm done with this thread, I didn't mean to get it off topic (I actually don't even see how it got off topic other then douchey mcgee came in with an attitude).

I actually like MinisterofDOOM so I'll leave his thread alone.


Return to “General Chat”