Scientific notation is pretty common in any graph?Scandinavian Flick wrote:and also, who writes "Revolution ( X 10 squared RPM) why not just write X 100 RPM
Your logic is correct, which is good, as it means that the residual loses are <10%.mcheddadi wrote:That means that the max power we can get from bolt on mods is 15hp!
then you come up with a theory to explain the chart from nissanBoilermaker318 wrote:So the only restriction that our engine has is the Y-pipe section of the exhaust? It seems unlikely...
being sure about something doesn't make it true, it's like being sure Santa exists...marvin5087 wrote:15 hp?....negative im sure we can get more then 15 from bolt ons..
but... Santa DOES exist.....mcheddadi wrote:
being sure about something doesn't make it true, it's like being sure Santa exists...
Also have to consider the power lost to CVT transmission, my guess that would be anywhere in the range of 5-8 hp depending on heat and other factors. Yet another reason why I'm glad I waited for a 6 speed.mcheddadi wrote:engine floating in the air with fuel delivery makes 285hp, engine with intake headers ypipe, exhaust, radiator etc = 270hp. thats what it means
Another point we have is the fact that 3rd gens and maxima's are well over that for crank hp. There is no way nissan would produce higher rated engine being tuned almost to its full potential..rich2342 wrote:I believe this to be bunk..
If headers and y-pipe are ever produced along with a decent tune the vq should be close to 300hp...
Can I quote the forum? Is that credible?mcheddadi wrote:so unless someone find up something, max hp gain from intake/exhaust type bolt-ons is 15hp
From the 2.5S Turbo Interest thread (started by Stillen)adidas2go wrote:
From a manual dyno, - the 5% more loss from the CVT, and you will have a close to accurate hp readout. Speed Force Racing got 420hp outta there last Altima kit
blackteam02 wrote:. . . .SOoOoo, 1 or 2 mods are about all you really need right? cuz we max out bolt-on mods @ 285hp. vq35de's are garbage if thats true.
page 5Loop wrote:Do we have a link to where this chart came from?