Positive Crankcase Evacuation Explained

Your premier source for information on the Turbo KA: KA24E-T and KA24DE-T (KA with aftermarket turbo kit)!
User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 23925
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

This is an excellent article that explains the PCV system and the valve itself.

Postive Crankcase Evacuation

Start by reading through that, so you will better understand my opinions on PCV Modification do's and don'ts.



The article mentions that increased mileage on the motor will lead to increased piston blowby. It doesn't mention that increased cylinder pressures also lead to increased blowby. Which means in the best case scenario, you've got at least one factor that leads to increased blowby and two if your motor isn't freshly rebuilt.

Why is that so important?

Because blowby gases contain a bunch of nasty stuff, from unburnt fuel to hydro carbons from the combustion process itself. At best, the combustion process has burnt all of the fuel and you only end up with nasty soot mixing with your oil...that's OK right? No.

Blowby is the #1 reason your oil is black when you change it. So even with the motor running naturally aspirated and the stock PCV System working at 100% you STILL get lots of blowby mixing with the oil. So much so that it turns totally black long before you are scheduled for a change. The oil cleanliness factor determines how fast your bearings wear as well as ALL the other lubricated surfaces in the entire motor. Sounds important when you think of like that huh? It is. Oil isn't changed because it's worn out...it's changed because it's contaminated.

Remember that we:1) Just increased the cylinder pressures across the board by adding a turbo.2) If your motor isn't fresh then you're already venting blowby into the oil. 3) If the tune isn't perfect you're adding increased blowby, in this case it's in the form of unburnt fuel. Adding boost requires the tune to be rich in order to not suffer from knock. Most consider this the "safety margin". It isn't bad in itself because it's necessary for most daily drivers. However, if the tune isn't perfect, you're pumping fuel into the oil.4)Cranked up the load / temperature of the entire motor causing further oil breakdown.

Knowing that, do you still want to take the stock system and weaken it? By that I mean any system or modification to the system that removes vacuum from the crankcase. Obviously we don't like the blowby gases being fed back into the intake manifold. It coats everything with carbon sludge and reduces the effective octane ratio of whatever fuel you'rein using. The next few things are idea's that don't work as well as the stock system. Yes they bypass the recirculation back into the motor, but at the cost of ruining your oil.

Having the valve covers vented to the atmosphere doesn't PULL blowby gases from the sump, it allows them to vent. The venting takes place when the sump fills up with vapor or the heat causes the vapor to rise on it's own. Doesn't sound very effective huh? That's because it isn't.

Having the PCV valve connected to the intake pipe pre-turbo doesn't PULL blowby from the motor. There is NO VACUUM before the turbo. When the turbo is spooled up it does pull quite a bit of air, however, when you're on boost you're also creating the most blowby. You also have to run an air / oil separator in-line so as not to have oil and carbon coat your entire intake tract. But wait, doesn't that just let the gases go back into the intake anyway? Hmm...

Those are the two most common setups that don't work. There are many other options that people have tried, but the fact remains. If you remove vacuum from the sump, you add crap to the oil.

What are our options then?

How about anything the mind can come up with, so long as the sump sees some type of vacuum related evacuation.

I like to keep things simple. So I choose to improve the factory system. I mean why not, it works and it's already in place. What parts can be improved? Well the PCV valve isn't designed for boost, so lets start by either adding an extra check valve that doesn't allow boost to creep past or swapping the stock PCV valve for one that's designed for boost.

The stock air / oil separator isn't ever changed. So lets add a air / oil separator in-line. One that allows us to monitor how much blowby we're actually removing and has changeable filters. I recommend the filters from Home Depot that they use for air compressors. Cheap and easy to install = win. In two simple steps we just increased the effectiveness of the stock system.

Another thing I do is swap oil filters in between oil changes, to cheap and to easy not to do.

Not enough? Want to remove the gas from going to the intake entirely?

You can run a vacuum pump. They can be had in the junkyard for about $40 from any older GM V8. They can be installed where ever because the pump is electric. Simply run an air / oil separator between the PCV valve and the pump and your done. Now you have vacuum even under boosted conditions. You can also buy aftermarket systems that go all the way to $550.

The other thing you can do is run a header mounted evacuation system. They are under $100 but only pull blowby when you're under a load. When idling there won't be enough exhaust flow to create the venturi required to pull the blowby. I also can't say without speculation what rpm and load would be enough to start the venturi effect. I'd use this method combined with the vacuum pump if I wanted the best of both worlds.

Questions?

WD


User avatar
GODCHSR
Posts: 840
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:45 am
Car: 1996 Nissan 240sx

Post

WDRacing wrote:
The other thing you can do is run a header mounted evacuation system. They are under $100 but only pull blowby when you're under a load. When idling there won't be enough exhaust flow to create the venturi required to pull the blowby. I also can't say without speculation what rpm and load would be enough to start the venturi effect. I'd use this method combined with the vacuum pump if I wanted the best of both worlds.

WD
This is what I am familiar with.Your Constructive Criticism of it could also be applied to the factory system though. Without higher RPMs or WOT you don't have a ton of vaccum either... so I think the Exhaust pulling method is best because it creates vacuum and also still has to travel through the Catalytic Convertor for those who are environmentally conscience.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 23925
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

I've read some really good things about header systems, however they are usually placed near or at the collector where the exhaust gas velocity is extremely high. In our case they'd be mounted after the O2 sensor which is already at least a foot away from the turbine outlet. So I don't know how much exhaust energy will available or at what rpm range. This method also won't work for those that need to pass the sniffer. Since it dumps a crap load hydrocarbons right onto the cat...lol. But there are ways around it etc...just something to bare in mind.

I'm probably going with the GM Vacuum pump. I've read that if done correctly it actually put enough vacuum on the sump that it stopped a rear main seal leak. That's impressive for a $40 pump and some heater hose...lol.

Combine the 2 and you'd be golden

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 71063
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 S13, 92 SE-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

B, I want some specifics on that.

I'm just running a breather, and you KNOW how much work I put into my motor... Plus the fact that I kept stock compression (actually probably HIGHER, since it's built to closer tolerances)... I could probably use this.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 23925
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

Not a problem brosef.

Here's the Summit Racing Header Mounted Kit, $39 for the whole kit, minus 5/8's hose.



Let me dig up the part numbers for the Electric Pump stuff.

WD

User avatar
GODCHSR
Posts: 840
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:45 am
Car: 1996 Nissan 240sx

Post

GM part number 12554580



Pretty basic setup

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 23925
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

With that particular pump I believe you have to take it apart and remove a filter from the inside to maximize the suction of the pump. Also, a separator is a must for the GM pumps if you want long life. If oil gets inside they die fairly quickly by everyhting I've read.

That is the pump I'll probably use though. I'm hunting for a few alternatives right now.

Got a link that sells those pumps new?

WD

kouki_hmongster
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:22 am
Car: Want 97 kouki

Post

well explained....now lets hope this clears up all those mix ups. i've been reading other peoples info and most of them are misleading, even on the Ka-t.org.

here's the way i did mine to improve my stock PCV system.zer...06595

i like the exhaust gas set-up since it would have vacuum during boost when the PCV closes. Vacuum pump would be really nice too.

I've been really busy but i will take pictures of my setup collecting blowby gas to prove that this really works.

supra33202
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:49 am

Post

Is there any how-to-install guide for header mounted evacuation system?

http://www.summitracing.com/pa...large

Thanks!

User avatar
ace0073
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:48 pm
Car: 1969 datsun 510

Post

similar pump i think:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors....m245

also here is a site that I read on the subject. It has some good info, some not applicable to our setups but good none-the-less:

http://www.dragstuff.com/techa....html
Modified by ace0073 at 6:30 PM 8/26/2009

User avatar
GODCHSR
Posts: 840
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:45 am
Car: 1996 Nissan 240sx

Post

That Ebay link actually looks like it was designed for this purpose. Sweet!

User avatar
D-UNIT
Posts: 787
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 10:37 pm
Car: a 91' S13 (15.014 @ 94.56mph NA) KA-T

Post

So what do you do about tuning. You are releasing metered air out of the system. Blow by or not the pcv system is after the MAF so it is accounted for by the ecu.

kouki_hmongster
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:22 am
Car: Want 97 kouki

Post

supra33202 wrote:Is there any how-to-install guide for header mounted evacuation system?

http://www.summitracing.com/pa...large

Thanks!
You seem to have done a lot of research on this but the good thing is i think you finally understand the how the PCV system works. I remember giving you info about my set-up and i guess you ignored it so i didnt care to help...but i guess now you KNOW!

User avatar
GODCHSR
Posts: 840
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:45 am
Car: 1996 Nissan 240sx

Post

...
Modified by GODCHSR at 3:33 PM 8/27/2009

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 23925
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

D-UNIT wrote:So what do you do about tuning. You are releasing metered air out of the system. Blow by or not the pcv system is after the MAF so it is accounted for by the ecu.
Don't mistake what I'm saying. The system will work fine if you add a air / oil separator and a new check valve to the stock setup.

The people that are adding an exhaust mounted evac system and wiring up vacuum pumps should be quite able to tune the car themselves. Or at least they are aware that when you change things on the motor you need to verify the timing and AFR's.

If you're wondering how much of a change this will cause simply unhook the vac line coming from the PCV valve and plug it. Check you AFR's and base timing. Tune accordingly.

WD

User avatar
trackslut240
Posts: 312
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:24 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX
Contact:

Post

WD thats an awesome explanation of the whole PCV mystery. thanksany links to getting the check valve coz i looked one up on mcmaster carr, which seems to do the job well. http://www.mcmaster.com/#about...e3ue8the valve i thought of is 7775K61 for $11.971/8" cracking pressure .3 psi, also the lowest Cv(Cv factor (coefficient of volume) is the amount of water (in gpm) that will pass through a fully open valve at 1 psi with 1 specific gravity (60° F).)just need you inputs, thanks

now with the vacuum pump, would it be long lasting on a daily driver? i was thinking of making it run with the check vavle, so it would kick on at idle and WOT(tied in to the TPS). the rest of the time just use the check valve method. maybe i am wringing my brain too much? this pcv is no joke, the tuner shop i went to for some welding told me to vent it atmosphere...

User avatar
koukiKA240
Posts: 566
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 5:18 am
Car: 1991 240sx KA-T

Post

what about a system that sources a vacuum before the turbo after the MAF, to a oil seperator, to the engine?

If running the vacuum pump would a catch tank with baffles and packing be enough to protect the pump?
Modified by koukiKA240 at 3:24 AM 8/29/2009

User avatar
GODCHSR
Posts: 840
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:45 am
Car: 1996 Nissan 240sx

Post

trackslut240 wrote:this pcv is no joke, the tuner shop i went to for some welding told me to vent it atmosphere...
To be fair though, that will prevent the RMS from blowing out... because the 'mini' filter becomes the path of least resistance.

It just won't increase oil life.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 23925
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

koukiKA240 wrote:what about a system that sources a vacuum before the turbo after the MAF, to a oil seperator, to the engine?

If running the vacuum pump would a catch tank with baffles and packing be enough to protect the pump?

Modified by koukiKA240 at 3:24 AM 8/29/2009
Did you read the part that said THERE IS NO VACUUM BEFORE THE TURBO? You can't source something that isn't there. Vacuum is created by a force pulling air against a restriction. You have air being pulled through the turbo but there is no restriction on the other end to cause the vacuum.

Does that help?
trackslut240 wrote:WD thats an awesome explanation of the whole PCV mystery. thanksany links to getting the check valve coz i looked one up on mcmaster carr, which seems to do the job well. http://www.mcmaster.com/#about...e3ue8the valve i thought of is 7775K61 for $11.971/8" cracking pressure .3 psi, also the lowest Cv(Cv factor (coefficient of volume) is the amount of water (in gpm) that will pass through a fully open valve at 1 psi with 1 specific gravity (60° F).)just need you inputs, thanks

now with the vacuum pump, would it be long lasting on a daily driver? i was thinking of making it run with the check vavle, so it would kick on at idle and WOT(tied in to the TPS). the rest of the time just use the check valve method. maybe i am wringing my brain too much? this pcv is no joke, the tuner shop i went to for some welding told me to vent it atmosphere...
I don't know if I'd use the valve in your link.

I know for a fact that the PCV from the 87 Buick GNX will work very well and it's only $3 and available at any Autozone

Buick GNX PCV Valve



You can either ADD that one inline or replace the stock one with it. I'd add it in

WD

User avatar
trackslut240
Posts: 312
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:24 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX
Contact:

Post

thanks WD, that should make my oil life more than 1500 miles, now to get back to work and get that motor running.

+1 for Sticky!!

Daily Driven 240
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:05 pm
Car: s-13

Post

thanks WD for the buick pcv valve alternative, i was looking for one way check valves for air compressors but it seems that around were i live it isnt easy to find. The 87 buick gnx pcv valve it is then.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 23925
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

You guys have Autozone up in Canada?

User avatar
Chris28
Posts: 3159
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:18 am
Car: 92 s13 KA-T
Location: 757/919
Contact:

Post

Hmmmm maybe this is why I can't get my oil pan to seal. It's warped, but I figured enough RTV would seal it.

When my engine is out in a few weeks I'm planning on installing a check valve and a home depot filter.

User avatar
shimizu_17
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:21 am

Post

Good thread thanks WD

Daily Driven 240
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:05 pm
Car: s-13

Post

we have alot of auto parts stores just their not called autozone, but im sure i wont have a hard time finding the buick gnx pcv valve, it was the one way check valves for air compressors i was having a hard time finding.

so thanks for the alternative makes my life easier.

User avatar
Chris28
Posts: 3159
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:18 am
Car: 92 s13 KA-T
Location: 757/919
Contact:

Post

Wait, so that Buick PCV valve is a check valve?

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 23925
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

Daily Driven 240 wrote:we have alot of auto parts stores just their not called autozone, but im sure i wont have a hard time finding the buick gnx pcv valve, it was the one way check valves for air compressors i was having a hard time finding.

so thanks for the alternative makes my life easier.
I was just messing with you, I like to give all our Northern members a hard time The staff guys we have up your way catch hell in the Mod forum
Chris28 wrote:Wait, so that Buick PCV valve is a check valve?
A PCV valve IS a check valve. All it does is allow liquid or gas to move in one direction. Any reverse flow closes the valve.

WD

Daily Driven 240
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:05 pm
Car: s-13

Post

thanks for the warm welcome WD lol.

supra33202
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:49 am

Post

kouki_hmongster wrote:well explained....now lets hope this clears up all those mix ups. i've been reading other peoples info and most of them are misleading, even on the Ka-t.org.

here's the way i did mine to improve my stock PCV system.zer...06595

i like the exhaust gas set-up since it would have vacuum during boost when the PCV closes. Vacuum pump would be really nice too.

I've been really busy but i will take pictures of my setup collecting blowby gas to prove that this really works.
Looking forward for your pictures.

redhb240SXS13
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 12:10 pm
Car: 1992 240sx Coupe and 1995 240sx

Post

So WD, what your suggesting is to run the stock PCV valve to a check valve, out of the check valve to a catch can/ oil separator, and back into the four ports on the bottom of the upper intake mani? I heard people plug those holes because they are a common boost leak nuiscense. If thats the case where would you suggest returning the air back into the system at?

I may be completely off on this, still getting a grip on this PCV business.


Return to “KA24ET / KA24DET Forum”