szhosain wrote:Lots of actual drive tests (and a chart!) here: http://www.tomshardware.com/ch....html
Z
Your specs are for a very old computer and processor (and memory size of 128 MByte is very low too). I am surprised that you are able to do any video editing with any reasonable speeds ... or is this more of a "want to do" rather than a "doing currently"?Chaotic_Warlord wrote:I currently have a Dell Optiplex GX150, here are the specs...
Processor Intel Pentium III 933 MHzChipset Intel 815EInstalled Memory 128 MB (SDRAM)Processor Intel Pentium IIIProcessor Speed 933 MHzProcessor Manufacturer IntelProcessor Upgradability UpgradableInstalled Qty 1Max Processors Qty. 1MotherboardBus Speed 133 MHzVideo Output Interface Direct AGPMemoryRAM Technology SDRAMInstalled RAM 128 MBMax Supported RAM 512 MBNumber of Memory Slots 2 x DIMMsSupported RAM Speeds 133 MHzInstalled Cache Memory 256 KBTechnical FeaturesIntegrated Input/Output Ports USB 1.1 x 2 • Serial Port x 2 • RJ45 Lan Port x 1 • PS/2 Mouse x 1 • PS/2 Keyboard x 1 • Parallel Port (ECP/EPP/SPP) x 1 • Floppy Port x 1Security Features Slot For Cable Lock • Setup Password • Administrator PasswordHard Drive 20 GBController Type EIDE
The Video Card is a Nvidia 64MB video card from 2001 and the sound card is a SoundBlaster Audigy. I have replaced the CDRW drive with a DVD R/W drive, besides that nothing is different than how it came from the factory.
I'd go with a Desktop drive if it's going to be stationary. You can get 1TB drives for $100C-Kwik wrote:FYI, Costco is selling a 500GB WD Passport Elite for $100.00. AS far as I can tell, the price will be that until the end of the month, but its a while supplies last offer. It may also require a coupon but they usually have the coupon books available at the door. If you don't have a membership, find a friend who does and offer to buy them a costco hot dog for taking you. Or you could get them to order it for you online.
http://www.costco.com/Browse/P...en-US
Agreed. They will be faster (usually 7200 rpm) and larger for less money than a "portable" USB drive.PoorManQ45 wrote:I'd go with a Desktop drive if it's going to be stationary.
PoorManQ45 wrote:I'd go with a Desktop drive if it's going to be stationary. You can get 1TB drives for $100
No disagreements from me that a desktop stationary would be faster. But, I have to wonder what people are buying these desktop drives for? Most people have space in their computer cases to fit another HDD. While, they can be portable, most require separate power which can make it cumbersome to use. Perhaps someone can shed some light for me on why people prefer this over an internal drive as the only real application I see for it is when the cases are too small (HP slimlines as an example) or hooked up to a laptop/docking station. Perhaps even in cases where someone already filled their PC with HDDs and still need more space.szhosain wrote:Agreed. They will be faster (usually 7200 rpm) and larger for less money than a "portable" USB drive.
Mostly I agree with you. Internal drives are definitely faster in most ways (usually SATA nowadays). However, external eSATA drives work just as fast too.C-Kwik wrote:No disagreements from me that a desktop stationary would be faster. But, I have to wonder what people are buying these desktop drives for? Most people have space in their computer cases to fit another HDD. While, they can be portable, most require separate power which can make it cumbersome to use. Perhaps someone can shed some light for me on why people prefer this over an internal drive as the only real application I see for it is when the cases are too small (HP slimlines as an example) or hooked up to a laptop/docking station. Perhaps even in cases where someone already filled their PC with HDDs and still need more space.
And outside of the above cases, the only types of external storage I see as logically useful are NAS and portable drives. Perhaps its limited by what I consider useful, so feel free to enlighten me.
Agreed...but I don't think most people who bought such a drive would have used that kind of reasoning. Hell, I've never seen or heard of such a problem occurring so I doubt many would ever consider it.PoorManQ45 wrote:From a pure backup standpoint if the internal power supply were to fail and direct current and voltage improperly all devices inside the computer would fail.
More then likely the external drive with it's seperate power supply would be spared.
Other then that, I personally prefer internal drives for the reasons you mentioned.
I can buy #1. Probably doesn't to most of us in here though.szhosain wrote:Mostly I agree with you. Internal drives are definitely faster in most ways (usually SATA nowadays). However, external eSATA drives work just as fast too.
Think of an external drive as a convenience:
1. You don't have to open the case to put it in. No concerns about power supplies being too small, etc. Easier for people who feel computer challenged.
2. The drive can be moved to a different computer pretty easily. At home, I tend to cart a small drive around from computer to computer backing them up (don't have a NAS yet ... will do that someday soon).
3. My primary computer is now a laptop (I use a docking station at home and work and take the computer back and forth every day), so getting more storage for it is only possible with an add-on drive. I use an external Firewire unit for backups - it is a 7200 rpm unit from Seagate and works well for this purpose.
Z
True, but not all!C-Kwik wrote:I can buy #1. Probably doesn't to most of us in here though.
Ah. I use a USB-powered drive to cart around the house and do backups, so no power cable is needed for that. It is a slower drive at 5400 rpm, but good enough to do unattended backups. A small Western Digital model ... I forget the size.C-Kwik wrote:2. I guess that's subjective and perhaps dependent one one's usage. We have a 320GB USB drive. It uses a full sized HDD so its a bit bulky, but aside from that, like most stationary drives, it requires its own power supply. That alone has been exceptionally frustrating. The GF actually got it years ago while she was still in school as she had to keep a very large amount of her data on it and transport it between school and home. Home was not as big of a deal, but at school, she had to crawl under the desk every day to plug it in.
C-Kwik wrote:3. I provided that exception already, but we totally agree here.
We ended up picking up that WD Passport model I linked to. Uses USB Bus power as well. Except it doesn't appear to be working with a retractable cable. Either the cable is bad or just not thick enough to carry power (however small the power requirements are).szhosain wrote:Ah. I use a USB-powered drive to cart around the house and do backups, so no power cable is needed for that. It is a slower drive at 5400 rpm, but good enough to do unattended backups. A small Western Digital model ... I forget the size.
Well at the time, she would not necessarily get the same workstation twice (at school).We have it set up pretty handily at home, but its still a bit combersom compared with just plugging in a single USB connection. We would have opted for a single USB connection back then, but they were much more expensive with the size that she needed (300 GB).szhosain wrote:Inre the crawling under the desk, why not use a small power strip with the drive so the switch in a handy location? Albeit not as interesting a sight, I suppose!
I likely have a similar model - mines a Passport Elite, and yes they are all 5200rpm.C-Kwik wrote:We ended up picking up that WD Passport model I linked to. Uses USB Bus power as well. Except it doesn't appear to be working with a retractable cable. Either the cable is bad or just not thick enough to carry power (however small the power requirements are).