themadscientist wrote:Obama can communicate effectively but he is lying the whole time..
What, precisely, are we guessing that Obama is lying about? I'm not insinuating that there isn't anything, but I'd like to know specifically.
AZhitman wrote:I'm disappointed in BO for "taking a knee" and letting the clock run out while so many questions remain unanswered.
The MSM sure as hell won't get any answers for us.
I've heard this from a number of conservatives, both publicly and personally, in recent months. What "answers", specifically, are you looking for?
On Ayers, the details are fairly easy to look up. They served on a board together, and it *does* appear that Ayers hosted some kind of event in his home for Obama. I wish they didn't have an association, but he appears to be a tough guy to avoid for any Democratic Chicago Politician ("citizen of the year" in Chicago in 1997). It seems that numerous Democrats and Republicans have had passing associations with the guy as he's apparently a fairly prominent Chicago figure, but no one's accusing any of these people of being bombers. Barack condemned the acts in question, and IMO this is really all he can do.
On Wright, Obama is quite plainly indifferent in regards to religion. In his books, it is obvious to all but the most oblivious readers that his religious affiliations are purely political in motivation, much like John McCain's. Neither man is ardently religious but both know that religious indifference is not electable in these United States. Obama's association with Wright is also quite plainly not for religious reasons but rather political ones. Black politics is still largely centralized in churches, and Wrights church was apparently the place to be in Chicago. Obama, with his lack of any ties to the once-enslaved US black population, was in danger of being "not black enough" unless he allied himself with a few traditional bastions of black political power. Wright is indisputably a nut, but so is Rod Parsley. People keep strange allies to get themselves elected, that's the American way. I can't think of one successful politician who doesn't do this. I'm not going to rate politicians on their associations unless there's credible evidence that they've personally said or done something objectionable.
Both of these answers, as you can see, are just guesses at Obama's motivation and circumstances. They do not present any new facts. This is because, at this stage, all we can do is guess at motivations. There are no new facts and there will be no new facts. If you are waiting for some kind of incriminating bombshell you will be disappointed, as if there were any the McCain campaign would have surely unearthed them by now.
We're not going to hear that Obama wrote some secret letter to Wright condemning the United States or that Obama was a regular golf buddy of Ayers. The information is already out there, don't hold your breath for anything else.