There's been LOTS of great detailed oil discussions. I suggest you search for older (archived) threads about oil including posts made by the 2 quoted below.
PalmerWMD wrote:The following oils meet MB229.1 and MB229.3 specs.
Those are Mercedes benz oil specs that are very tight for volatilty, deposit control, lubricity, anti-foaming and are somewhat biased toward hard driving environment w/o being racing oils (which carry their own penalties).
1)Kendall GT-1 FullSynth 5W-402)Chevron Supreme Synthetic 5W-403)Valvoline Synpower 5W-404)Havoline Synthetic 5W-405)Pennzoil Synthetic Euro 5W-406)Mobil 1 0W-40 and 15W-507)Quaker State Synthetic Euro 5W-40 8)Castrol Syntec 10W-40 and 5W-50 (editdont use the 5w-50 in extended drain)
The majority of those oils listed are NOT group IV PAO oils anymore(which are becoming rarer by the month).
Redline and AMSOIL some excellent group IV+ V oils, are not listed, cuz they use additional anti wear additives that the auto industry doesn't like, for catalytic converter warranty reasons (tho many feels they protect engines at <least> as well as API oils).(This keeps them from API certification, which means they can't meet MB229.1,MB229.3 for this reason only)
But in all fairness it does show, that you can meet some pretty tough specs, using group III base stocks, despite what many group IV enthusiasts such as myself say.
PalmerWMD wrote:MOBIL1 is still PAO, even in the newer formulation.It seems the supersyn is for real and not a step back, like we had when MOBIL1 switched to trisyn, which was a step down in some PPL's opinion.Valvoline includes some PAO group IV, and some esters (group V but is now (recent change) mostly group III in its base oil.
Chevron Supreme synthetic it seems to be made in 2 places one of which uses PAO base stock and the other group II+.All others are group III now, (some were recently group IV).
PalmerWMD wrote:Group I: traditonal refined lube stockGroup II: well refined oil, tighter fractions achieved with some chemical functional goups modifed, invloving more refining steps originally came about as a method by which refineries could utilize less desirable fractions for lubrication oils.Better heat resistance than group I, but less inherent detergency than group I.They have much in common w/ group III except a lesser VIndex.Group III: hydroisomerized paraffinic base stocks, are excellent lubricants, approach many of the abiltiies of PAO, not considered a true synthetic (outside of marketing depts) because , parafinic fractions oils are taken/refined and with the action of a catalyst modified, so as to optimize their properties as lubricants as well as their uniformity.An easier ( and cheaper?) process than making tru synthetics like:GroupIV: PolyAlphaOlefins, created by taking ethylene gas and using addtion reactions to combine the ethylene gas molecules into a lubricant oil with purpose designed properties.famous for their cold flow abilieties and innate multiviscosity behaviour (meaning less VII's need to make a multi-vis oil)Group V: All other kinds of real synthetic oils, usually this means ester base oil formulations , performance smiliar to PAOs (or better)
texasoil wrote:I know there is a lot of confusion about Group III vs Group IV base oils. A group II base oil has a viscosity index as high as 120. Group III base oils are more than 120, as are Group IV's.
In lubrication aspect, there is no measurable diferences between good Group I, Group II, Group III, and Group IV. In fact, in very high loads like on camshaft lobes, plain Group I works better than plain Group IV.
What you get with Goup II is lower sulphur, lower unsaturated compounds, and better control of volatility. Low sulphur content is being pushed for 'protection of emission contol systems (catalysts)' Lower volatility is being pushed so Auto Mfg claimed fuel economy does not deteriorate of life of the recomended oil change interval (the Fed' are getting wise to all the 'tweaks, bat wings, pinch of skoal etc. the auto guys have been using). Lower unsaturated compounds tends to mean longer life in the crankcase before deposits and crud start forming and the oil thickens. ( less amounts of the detergent additives are needed, again reducing the risk to catalysts.)
Group IV base oils are well known for excellent flow properties at low temperatures. Group III base oils are not quite as good there, but are very good. In the engine, the 2 base oils (grp III and grp IV are identical in performance. Both are essentially isoparaffins (grp IV's have one double bond between the last 2 carbon atoms. They look the same physically, and behave the same almost completely. Grp III's are much more environmental friendly since they come from oil rather than being synthesized from natural gas (it is insane to take a clean fuel like nat gas and process it into a compound which is easire to extract from petroleum.
The REAL performance is mostly determined by the additive package in the finished blend. grp IV's have poor solubility, and the additive packages actually must contain some of the lower quality Grp I and Grp II diluents to keep the additives dissolved. Grp III base stocks are better that Grp IV, wors that Grp II. In my opinion, Grp II base oils are the all around best for engines in most conditions.
texasoil wrote:I personally run Valvoline semisynthetic. In my opinion its higher solvency is desirable in my higher mileage engines (92 Q45a, 113K, owned 3.5yrs since 90K, 94 Q45a 103K , owned 2 years since 90K), 94 MBZ sl600 (V12), owned 2 yrs, since 79K) All have Valvoline semisynthetic 10W 30 now, 20W50 summer (Houston Tx)
I used to run Mobil 1 exclusively, but discovered clear varnish laydown in my previous MBZ 560sel with 5000 mile changes! Cleaned right up with the Valvoline semisynthetic. Since I continue to use Chervon premium exclusively, it was not gasoline causing the problem, but the oil detergancy and my driving habits (too much short trip for the drain interval). Now 6 month or, 3500 miles max.
One must remember the PAO's are a mix of molecules, not exact copies of each other. They have nearly as much variation as good grp III stuff. People far more knowledgeable about the details of these molecular types have assurred me they are essentially identical. There is no such thing as 'pure component' in higher hydrocarbons. Entropy rules.
One interesting note-- when the PAO gets into the combustion chamber, it tends to 'burn' completely, making no 'oil smoke' and leaving no residue. Once it starts to oxidize, it goes completely.
I used to work in lubes with a major oil company, and every summer we ran test fleets in south Texas, 70 MPH 24/7, A/C on high, roof racks. Different oil formulations, different fuels, a host of test stuff. After 40K miles the vehicles were disassembled and inspected. (NO OIL OR FILTER CHANGEs mind you.) "old' Havoline 20w and 10W40 , running the Firechief and Skychief standard pump gasoline(the 'standards) routinely completed the tests with all parts within new manufacturing tolerances and no measurable wera. Even did radioactive tracer studies (irridate top piston ring.etc. ) Different fuels (no detergents) would often suffer engine failure before completing the test. Skychief engines were always cleaner though.
So, when I see/hear about 100,000 mile tests, (with regular oil and filter changes) run 24/7, I am not impressed.That's less than 2000 hours of operation. Give me a NYc taxi test for a full 12 months( winter and summer) with 25000 mile changes--then talk to me.
Me oil is cheap, hard parts expensive. Better to change more frequently than buy expensive advertizing and 'gee whiz magic' oil