2011 Trans Am revealed

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
maddslow
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 3:10 pm

Post









User avatar
iwantans13
Posts: 3116
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:31 am
Car: Lamborghini Diablo VT

Post

OMFG, the camaro is ugly as **** but the T/A looks gorgeous! I may not hate pontiac as much as I used to!

User avatar
superDorifto
Posts: 1306
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 1:13 pm
Car: 1997 Eclipse Spyder - AWD/5spd swap in progress
1995 Q45 - 5spd swap in progress
1984 200sx hatch(KA-t swap) - 355WHP
1991/1993/1995/1997 240s - Dead
1982 200sx hatch - fixed/scrapped
Location: CT

Post

i demand a Knight Rider movie featuring that car right now!!!

User avatar
maddslow
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 3:10 pm

Post

superDorifto wrote:i demand a Knight Rider movie featuring that car right now!!!
they are

Rumor is pontiac is bringing it back for the new movie and to bank on it.

User avatar
bt2s14
Posts: 1997
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:10 pm
Car: 96 s14 VG30E swap on the way

Post

Cool the TA looks like a Corvette except really ugly, with photochopd hood scoop

things. Both too bulky and angular IMO

NSRsheets
Posts: 2000
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:07 am
Car: 2009 Nismo 370Z #85,1993 Nissan 240sx RB25DET coupe, 2013 focus

Post

Looks really good. I wouldn't mind driving one.

User avatar
Solar_Runner
Posts: 916
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:27 pm
Location: Rio Rancho, NM

Post

Don't like the grill of the Camaro... and if they're gonna do a T/A with the screaming chicken on the hood - it needs to be bigger... don't care for the twin scoops either - liked the shakers I had on mine.

Still, I can't wait to see what a production one looks like and to drive one. May consider a purchase during the SECOND model year!

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 34350
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

I'm usually not a Firebird fan (2nd gens were extremely hot, though) but I like that one. The fastback and tall haunches are SEX.Get rid of the hood scoops (Does Pontiac pay ANY attention to feedback about their styling? At all? Ever?) and the stupid hole/gouge/crease/whatthecrapisthat on the fender/door tops and it's pretty much perfect.

I love the quad lamp headlights.

Now, the question is:Is this really what it'll look like? Or an "artists conception"?

User avatar
Sabot
Posts: 1044
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 1:45 pm

Post

I think they in desperate need for car designers. They going in the right direction with trucks but cars they lacking something.

User avatar
Morph
Posts: 2521
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 9:02 pm
Car: 91 Sr Powered Coupe

Post

iwantans13 wrote:OMFG, the camaro is ugly as **** but the T/A looks gorgeous! I may not hate pontiac as much as I used to!
Uh... It's the same car but with a different front and rear bumper.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 34350
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Morph wrote:
Uh... It's the same car but with a different front and rear bumper.
Uh...No it isn't. Not one body panel looks the same.Totally different roofline.Different b-pillars.One's fastback, the other's not.Doors are completely different.NOT the same car with different bumpers.Try "same platform with different bodies."

User avatar
superDorifto
Posts: 1306
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 1:13 pm
Car: 1997 Eclipse Spyder - AWD/5spd swap in progress
1995 Q45 - 5spd swap in progress
1984 200sx hatch(KA-t swap) - 355WHP
1991/1993/1995/1997 240s - Dead
1982 200sx hatch - fixed/scrapped
Location: CT

Post

pfffft....same platform but with a different body...

User avatar
maddslow
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 3:10 pm

Post

if you right click and open the pics in a different window they are a little bigger and more clear.

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9683
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

I like 'em.

The T/A looks like a photshopped Vette...

User avatar
Bumnah
Posts: 2042
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:50 am
Car: 1992 240SX, black. Bone stock.
Contact:

Post




User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 71063
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 S13, 92 SE-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Still GM garbage.

How much you wanna bet they come out with the same interior switchgear they've been using since 1984?

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 34350
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

AZhitman wrote:Still GM garbage.

How much you wanna bet they come out with the same interior switchgear they've been using since 1984?
That'd be okay. If it's from 1984, it'll be knobs and levers. If it's from the 90's it'll be buttons for everything.

Early 90's Silverado "climate controls" FTFML.

User avatar
underground57
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 4:01 pm
Car: '93 240sx fastback, '04 Frontier

Post

While neither are my style, I think they could've done much worse. The overall design would work should they be coming out this year, but if they're projecting 2011, then they really need to up their game. They will be hopelessly outdated four years from now. And I agree, the TA definitely stole a few styling queues from the Corvette.

As an aside, I wonder if XAT will try to graft that front end onto their 240.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39664
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Except for that stupid golden bird and the hood scoops, it looks great. And if GM's current vehicles are any evidence, it'll be well built enough and reasonably decent inside, if not luxurious.

YAY FOR LS2.

User avatar
brisknfade
Posts: 1705
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 5:23 pm
Car: NB8C FTW

Post

Why is Burt Reynolds in the background of the first picture? At least I think it's Burt Reynolds.

That T/A does look a hell of alot like a 'Vette though. Sweet.

User avatar
otterman
Posts: 3380
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:43 pm

Post

omfg ewwww

nzmoman
Posts: 2302
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 2:27 pm
Car: 240sx 2 of em' and always lookin for more

Post

that black on in the first post looks like a glorified sunfire.

User avatar
audtatious
Moderator
Posts: 37008
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 5:31 pm
Car: 2017 Q60 Red Sport. Gone: 2014 Q50s, 2008 G37s coupe, 2007 G35s Sedan, 2002 Maxima SE, 2000 Villager Estate (Quest), 1998 Quest, 1996 Sentra GXE
Location: Stalking You
Contact:

Post

Looks like ricer crap to me. Too much going on and the lines do not look clean.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 18355
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2008 Acura TSX
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

audtatious wrote:Looks like ricer crap to me. Too much going on and the lines do not look clean.
I actually don't mind it, though IMHO they need to clean up the goofy fake rear diffusers. Too busy. I find it ironic Burt Reynolds is pictured. If you compare Burt now to how he looked in the original movie, and then compare this concept to the original Bandit car, they both look like their faces have been stretched and pulled back too much...

I think if they dump the vomitting chicken hood decal, 'da car aint bad. Of course, if GM builds them as crappy as the last ones, they won't last long.

User avatar
574-240sx
Posts: 9432
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 6:27 pm
Car: Nissans, Toyotas, Subaru

Post

I would rock a T/A if it looked like that.

User avatar
nsrZ32
Posts: 22244
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 8:27 am
Car: 90 300ZX TT, 78 280Z, 71 521 Pickup, 98 Sentra 2.0 SE, 02 Altima 3.5 SE, 01 Focus s2
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post

Looks better than the camaro

User avatar
Morph
Posts: 2521
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 9:02 pm
Car: 91 Sr Powered Coupe

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:
Uh...No it isn't. Not one body panel looks the same.Totally different roofline.Different b-pillars.One's fastback, the other's not.Doors are completely different.NOT the same car with different bumpers.Try "same platform with different bodies."
Can you split that hair any further.

User avatar
hsckris
Posts: 1623
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 12:02 pm
Car: 07 V8 4runner

Post

bt2s14 wrote: Both too bulky and angular IMO

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 34350
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Morph wrote:
Can you split that hair any further.
Who's splitting hairs?
iwantans13 wrote:OMFG, the camaro is ugly as **** but the T/A looks gorgeous! I may not hate pontiac as much as I used to!
Morph wrote:Uh... It's the same car but with a different front and rear bumper.
Maybe the next time you want to be arrogant you might try being right?

User avatar
9095240SXDUCK
Posts: 2673
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 5:49 pm
Car: 240SXs

Post

Damn I hate the look of the camaro but I am in love with the T/A its gorgeous!

If the next Nissan S car would look like that I will be first in line, even if they put a QR25DE in it.


Return to “General Chat”