240SX or 300ZX (Z32)

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
Janky240
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:57 am
Car: 1992 240SX

Post

Hi, Im new to the forum and I am deciding on whether I should buy a 1990 300ZX for $6,500 ( they might take $6,000) or should I go with a $4000 Nissan 240SX. I currently drive my dads 04' GTO and I like the power that it puts out. I just dont want to get my car and be highly dissapointed. So should I go with the 300ZX with 126k miles, or should I go for the 92' 240SX and have 2k leftover to drop into it engine/performance wise etc. Thanks a lot.


User avatar
JesusLikesKFC
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 9:16 pm
Car: 91 240sx, geo prizm

Post

you will be disapointed, serverely

One_Love
Posts: 8921
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 1:56 pm
Car: 1995 nissan 240sx

Post

is the z32 TT. BTW you can buy a swapped 240sx for 6k. It might have some good power.

User avatar
JesusLikesKFC
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 9:16 pm
Car: 91 240sx, geo prizm

Post

btw how does a 17yr old guy have 6500 bucks to spend? 2 n a half years ago i was lucky to bust my *** for 2k.

User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

I guess that it depends on what you're looking for.

I think that the NA Z32 gets largely ignored, even though it's a very very nice car, for what it is.

For a track/all-out performance car, I'd go with the 240, as you will get more bang for your buck than you would with an NA Z32.

You will be VERY disappointed with the power in either car, stock, coming from a GTO. Honestly, even with substantial mods and an SR swap on the 240, the GTO might continue to embarass it.

I mean, a modified twin-turbo Z32 would be comprable to the GTO, but even then the GTO would have more low-end grunt.

VH45DE into Z32 maybe? Or just buy a Q45, lol.


whiterps13
Posts: 4217
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 9:45 am
Car: white LE hatch

Post

Hmmm, I can can say for sure I would go with the Z32. If you can afford to keep it running well, it will turn out to be a much better car. Faster, more precise handling, etc. But, they are expensive to work on and parts dont come cheap. Look at the prices of aftermarket parts as well, a good cat back exhaust on a Z32 is damn near $1,000.

Bottom line, if your budget allows, the 300zx is far superior to the 240sx.

User avatar
JesusLikesKFC
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 9:16 pm
Car: 91 240sx, geo prizm

Post

it looks sexier too. but a n/a probly wont exite u. drove one with pullys, i/e/h and i wasnt thrilled. then again my dd is 230whp so i guess that statement rules me out.

User avatar
9240sx
Posts: 2676
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 4:06 am
Car: What i believe to be the cleanest s13 in the world.

SR20DET + RS*R-Apexi-Nismo-Trust-HKS= 100% pure love
Location: New Mexico

Post

SR20'ed 240..Best bang for ya buck..Easy to work on,Easy to get power out of the sr20.. You cant go wrong..You can make the sr20 240sx as fast or faster then the GTO easy..And without braking the bank.

User avatar
AmoebAssassin
Posts: 2424
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 7:11 am
Car: 1991 Base fastback 5spd, black

Post

9240sx wrote:SR20'ed 240..Best bang for ya buck..Easy to work on,Easy to get power out of the sr20.. You cant go wrong..You can make the sr20 240sx as fast or faster then the GTO easy..And without braking the bank.
+1

My buddy has a stock motor with GT2871R, fuel support mods, bolt ons, and a tune. He makes 351whp. That's enough to embarrass a GTO in a 240. Fact of the matter is, it's pretty simple to make power from an SR20.

User avatar
Black95s14
Posts: 915
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 3:33 pm
Car: 1995 Nissan 240sx

Post

If you get that 92 240sx for 4 grand you got ripped off!!!!!!!!!! i see s14's go for 4000 not 92 s13's. it better be imaaculate, probably has over 120k miles

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

You'll likely wreck whatever you get so whatever's cheaper.

LiteraryCannon
Posts: 227
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 5:43 pm

Post

Get the 240sx, it's a better tuner friendly car and has a great chassis and suspension base, you can modify it however you like and it will always reward you, it is a responsive car that is fun to drive, it is nimble and exilerating.

Yes, you will be dissapointed, but that's because 240's are slow compared to modern day standards, but that can be changed with mods, motor swaps, etc.

I've had both a z32 and 240sx, and the z32 wasn't that awesome, the best thing about it was the amount of attention it got.. but i'm not even sure if that's a good thing, considering theft, etc. Ladies love to wave to you in a z32.. in a 240sx.. not so much, haha. The z32 is heavy, not so good with handling, and extremely difficult to work on yoursef. There is almost no space to wrench.

Hope that helps. either car will be a dissapointment, so get that thought grounded in your mind.

User avatar
nvrplzd240
Posts: 4531
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:54 pm
Car: 04 G35, 02 CBR600 f4i, 90 Sentra
Location: WAFB, MO

Post

240 fo sho!

i lol'd at you asking this in the 240 forum.. what answers do you expect to get

User avatar
JesusLikesKFC
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 9:16 pm
Car: 91 240sx, geo prizm

Post

SeVa-S13 wrote:You'll likely wreck whatever you get so whatever's cheaper.
TOLD

RB20DETodd
Posts: 3763
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:30 pm
Car: 92 Nissan S13 coupe SE RB20DET

Post

SeVa-S13 wrote:You'll likely wreck whatever you get so whatever's cheaper.

User avatar
nsrZ32
Posts: 20795
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 8:27 am
Car: 90 Nissan 300ZX TT
78 Datsun 280Z
71 Datsun 521 Pickup
98 Nissan Sentra 2.0 SE
02 Nissan Altima 3.5 SE
01 Ford Focus S2
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post

I'd get the Z32.

I've driven and worked on a lot of swapped s13's and have a ton of z32 experience.

I realize this won't go over well with many here, but the Z32 is a sports car. The 240sx is a sporty car. Very different cars with different intentions out of the factory. If you want a sports car with the potential for more power than you could ever want, buy the Z. If you want a fun sporty car that can be stupid fast, buy a 240.

lrb_2000
Posts: 2854
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 6:41 pm
Car: '91 Nissan KA-T hatch
Contact:

Post

nsrZ32 wrote:I'd get the Z32.

I've driven and worked on a lot of swapped s13's and have a ton of z32 experience.

I realize this won't go over well with many here, but the Z32 is a sports car. The 240sx is a sporty car. Very different cars with different intentions out of the factory. If you want a sports car with the potential for more power than you could ever want, buy the Z. If you want a fun sporty car that can be stupid fast, buy a 240.
I agree.

User avatar
JimmyMethod
Posts: 6450
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 12:18 pm
Car: 97' 240SX SE
Contact:

Post

Seventeen year olds don't need fast cars.You'll end up doing something stupid like street racing or trying to 'drift' on a public road and end up with either a reckless driving ticket, or a crashed car or both.Get whatever's cheap and save the rest for college. If your college is already paid for, save the rest for alcohol you're bound to buy in college.

User avatar
mrzabala
Posts: 2469
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:34 pm
Car: 93 Nissan 240SX SE Hatch

Post

His dad may be well off so? Cause having 6000+ to spend at 17 is crazy. If you think about it he would have to work at age 15 1/2 all the way to now as many hours as he can and you have to consider school, hw, studying, projects, and maybe sports/ladies. Anyways go for the 240sx. Its not comparable to a 04 gto but hey the gto is a 04... not an 80's 90's car.

User avatar
240TweakerNewbee
Posts: 534
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:41 pm
Car: 1989 Nissan 240SX

Post

SeVa-S13 wrote:You'll likely wreck whatever you get so whatever's cheaper.
Awww, the place that sold me my SR20 clip said the same thing. I found out they actually had bets going on how long before I drive it off a cliff or wrap it around something. That was a year ago and Ive nearly doubled the HP since then from little mods here and there.

Whatever you decide to go with, just take time to learn it at each step of modification. And never think that boost is the only way to get more power.

I would also like to point out that the reason you can make a 240 fast with a smaller motor has much to do with weight; they are 2700(+ or -) vs the 300zx 3600lb (+ or -) ... 900lbs can make a real difference.

wickedpelf
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 11:08 am
Car: 1991 240sx with super hicas

Post

Janky240 wrote:Hi, Im new to the forum and I am deciding on whether I should buy a 1990 300ZX for $6,500 ( they might take $6,000) or should I go with a $4000 Nissan 240SX. I currently drive my dads 04' GTO and I like the power that it puts out. I just dont want to get my car and be highly dissapointed. So should I go with the 300ZX with 126k miles, or should I go for the 92' 240SX and have 2k leftover to drop into it engine/performance wise etc. Thanks a lot.
where does it say hes 17? both cars are going to be slower than the gto...but id say get the one you want more...which one do u like better...its ur money spend it how u want

One_Love
Posts: 8921
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 1:56 pm
Car: 1995 nissan 240sx

Post

check his profile playa

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

Jerry, stock for stock, the Z32 is leagues ahead of the 240. But I'd argue the 240 has more potential. Its only lacking power, as is the Z32TT compared to a GTO. And the 240 already has the Z's suspension. Put the Z motor in a S chassis, and its a completely different story. Its easier to add power to the S than shed pounds from the Z...

User avatar
nsrZ32
Posts: 20795
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 8:27 am
Car: 90 Nissan 300ZX TT
78 Datsun 280Z
71 Datsun 521 Pickup
98 Nissan Sentra 2.0 SE
02 Nissan Altima 3.5 SE
01 Ford Focus S2
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post

you'd be surprised. Its actually not to hard to drop a few hundred pounds from the Z32 and still retain a livable interior

User avatar
slydin'240
Posts: 880
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 6:19 pm
Car: 1993 240sx Coupe, 2003 Maxima SE
Contact:

Post



I say go with whatever you like more. They are both very nice cars.

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

slydin’240 wrote:

I say go with whatever you like more. They are both very nice cars.

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

600lbs is a big head start...

One place the Z will always win is styling. I would have never looked at a 240 if I hadnt loved the Z32 as a kid.

User avatar
k6kicker
Posts: 461
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 10:28 am
Car: 90 300zx(tt) 95 240sx

Post

I own both so i can speak firsthand.....Z32's own man.....reliable as hell but when something breaks its a pain to work on and parts cost as if they were made out of rhino tusks but it is totally worth it when its running

Janky240
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:57 am
Car: 1992 240SX

Post

SeVa-S13 wrote:You'll likely wreck whatever you get so whatever's cheaper.


Just because a kid like me wants to get his sort of "lower end dream car" doesnt mean that he's going to go be irresponsible, but I know what your saying. Im just saying, I want a car that will satisy me lol. My dad offered to buy me a brand new Cobalt LT and I was like " no thanks dad "
Modified by Janky240 at 12:39 AM 7/3/2006

User avatar
redline19
Posts: 132
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 12:08 pm
Car: 1997 240SX SE

Post

I owned a 90 z32 tt and currently have a 97 S14 SR and it all depends on what you want to do, they're both great cars.

The z32tt i bought @ 6,700 with about hte same miles that you're looking at, but don't be decieved, those cars are extremely high maintainence and parts costs triple or more the amount of 240 or normal sport compact vehicles. THe upside is the straigh line power is great and practically no turbo lag, and riding with the t tops down in the summer time. But that car is heavy as hell and is 16 years old, and you'll be spending thousands repairing parts over time.

The 240 is a very good handling car as everyone already knows. Stock, it takes corners like a champ and in comparison to the z32 its no contest, as the z32 is just to heavy the way it is. But as for the 240, you can always put off the swap until you've learned how to drive it properly or replace parts for it to be ready to be swapped and such - as in brakes, suspension, possibly 5 speed conversion if you're getting an automatic at a cheap price. But as far as power goes, stock is nothing compared to the gto you've been driving or even a z32 tt. and even with the SR installed stock, the straight line power is nothing compared to a tt or gto. I have my s14 sr at around 13lbs with fmic, tub. ex. manifold, full exhaust w/ split dp etc etc and its nothing compared to when i had my Z32 tt boosted at 12lbs stock or 19lbs when i had everything built.

either way you're going to spend a lot of the 240 with the swap and correlating parts to make it run decently fast, but with all that money spent it won't be as fast stock for stock with a gto or z32 tt. So ontop of the swap you'll be adding at least another 3k+ to make it the speed that you're looking for.

hope this helps in your decision


Return to “240sx General Discussion”