...at which point, you completely defeated the purpose.elwesso wrote:Ive thought about that... You could also take the new rotors and ask them to shave them down a little.....
Agreed, and I'd be worried about the "thinness" of the remaining rotor mass. They're not solid.Falkdesigns wrote:...at which point, you completely defeated the purpose.
I think the second guess is pretty close, actually. I decided to do the z32 upgrade because I could get rotors, calipers (used) with pads included, and the spacers I needed all for about the same price I was going to pay for new rotors/pads on my G50.Falkdesigns wrote:How much cheaper? ...unless first gen rotors are like $60 each vs. $30 each for Z rotors, it seems completely pointless to me.
Q45tech wrote:
As you will note the Q front rotor at 17.5 pounds unfortunately many replacement rotors [same size] can be as low as 16.0 pounds. Studying BMW M cars indicates 56 pounds of rotors for 3500 pound cars therefore one could assume [that a 4300 pound Q would need [4300/3500= 1.228 x or 68-69 pounds of rotors........something like a 22 pound front rotor with thicker/heavier rears [10>12 pounds] ............too achieve the same brake mass as a 1988 M5 BMW. The newer LS430 has 20.1 pound front rotors vs 18.8 lbs in the 1998 LS400 vs 16.8 pound in the orginal LS400 [1990]. "One brake manufacturer showed us a cutaway of an offshore "economy" rotor for a particular vehicle that had 32 ribs. The OEM rotor, by comparison, had 37 ribs and provided up to eight percent better cooling than the economy rotor when tested in the laboratory. And because the OEM rib design ran cooler, pad life was 28 percent longer than the economy rotor. Another aftermarket brake manufacturer showed us test results that proved their rib design improves cooling and makes their rotor three times quieter than a competitive rotor. The recorded sound levels showed noise as high as 85 decibels screaming out of the Brand X economy rotor compared to only 40 to 50 decibels from their own "premium" quality rotor. " <http://www.babcox.com/editorial/bf/bf10312.htm> web.umr.edu/~enggrweb/seminars/PresentationSlides/ws2003/Bhat031703.ppt
Yeah, I remember Joe wighed them and they were more than stock.squeefoo wrote:I had to go to the post office and use their scale...
17.8125 LBS. Both the same !
Brembo's spec claims 17.93 LBS.