Chaotic_Warlord wrote:So with a full counterweighted crank would this increase or decrease you displacement? since IIRC the reason you dont want to get the kit that IPP has is because the crank and rod arm throw are to long to begin with so to go say a 2.6L setup in the KA would further decrease the top RPMs. or do I have that all wrong? I'm a tad bit confused on how a fully counterweighted would benefit the KA, and would it draw more of an interest from the NA guys or those running FI? Not that I have the money to spend on such a thing since I'm pretty much flat broke but one day hopefully soon I would like to get me a spare KA block and build it up to be fully bulletproof.
When speaking with Paul (nismo) the KA still maintains it's 2.4 litre displacement. Redline is at about 9200RPM, when there is no friction, or resistance on the engine, it is noted that the core series KA's rev to 11,000RPM in the air, without blowing the valve train or a rod.The first production fully counterweighed used stock rods and pistons, didn't achieve as high of numbers. Nismo has made several different cranks (along with new and redesigned internals) to achieve higher, smoother harmonic redlines, nismo bearings (cap, and rods) were applied changing the dynamic of the engine for low friction, to obtain a higher redline. The specs of the rod and piston are changed to use less angle creating less friction for piston bore and stroke, (also one of the main contributors to the changes in the bearing sizes).To answer your question, if it would accomplish anything, I would say so. Fully counterweighed cranks are STRONGER, and much more durable. Half weighted cranks deal with much more flexing and torsional stresses as RPM's increase, basically decreaing power in the power band as RPM's increase (bad harmonics). Since a fully counter weighed crank also achieves better harmonics at higher revving, there is ultimately less stress applied to the valve train as well as the rods, (Less chance of bending a rod at higher rpm). In the process of achieving smoother harmonics HP and torque both increase thropugh out the entire power band. More lowend torque @ lower RPM's, as HP increases @ higher RPM's.The only disadvantage would be the turbulence created from oil flinging and raised pressure, which can be corrected with knife edging. I wouldn't really find knife edging to be a major concern either.Those are the advantages for FI, and NA.Tomorrow is the 3rd and the NISMO shop will be open, I will call Paul back to see if he has an email address that I can hand out so that he can answer the majority of everyones questions.Ultimately I am seeking a fully counterweighed crank that will allow me to use all OEM rods and pistons. Looking to keep the car streetable and affordable to build. Those GT and core engines have extremely high advanced timing, and get horrible gas mileage. I don't mind the friction that happens with OEM applicable parts, and there is just more abundance of the stock OEM.