What turbo for X horsepower? (chart inside)

Discuss the RB20, RB25 and RB26 series engines.
Joe
Posts: 6511
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 8:29 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Post

here is a chart one of our members(Bronze MFP) came across on an aussie skyline forum. its important to remember these are for ESTIMATED horsepower numbers dont take them very litterally. just use it for a general idea of what you are going for.

1st Manufacturer is HKS (duh)2nd is Greddy 3rd is APEXi4th is KKK5th is power enterprises

if any of those are incorrect please let me know.


User avatar
Dano
Posts: 11535
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 8:01 pm
Car: '05 Nissan Frontier Nismo CC
'95 Nissan 240SX base
Location: Kansas City, KS/ Phx, AZ
Contact:

Post

nice find Joe

-Dan

Joe
Posts: 6511
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 8:29 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Post

240sx2nr95 wrote:nice find Joe

-Dan
i did all the easy work dont thank me

User avatar
krayton
Posts: 1090
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 11:10 am

Post

Sort of on topic. Off the local boards a turbo expert did this research on HKS turbos: (all info is from him and his findings)

Well I decided to cross reference the HKS line of signiture turbos to show you how outragious thier prices are. Yes, I know everyone knows they are ultra expensive, but not everyone knows exactly whats involved here. This just makes me puke!

TO4S($2800) = 60-1/P-trim($800) Thats right. The TO4S is nothing more than your average 60-1, that can be purchased anywhere. I have seen them for as low as $550. But $800 gets you a nicely built unit. $2000 difference. Huh!

TO4R($2900) = T-67/P-trim($900) Yes, the mighty TO4R. Again, a very nice T67 can be had for the cheap price of $900, and will work the same as the legendary TO4R. All this while saving $2000.

TO4Z($3500) = T-67/P-trim with a fancy compressor cover($1000) OK, this is where HKS gets really rediculous. The TO4Z is a ball bearing TO4R with a fancy compressor cover that doesnt increase power in any way. So, get a T-67/P-trim and I'll polish the compressor for ya, for 100 bucks. That brings it to $1000 without the ball bearing option.(Innovative may be able to make something custom in Ball bearing for well under $3500) A $2500 difference!! This is the biggest rip off of the bunch. Simply astonishing what HKS can get away with...Astonishing!

T51R KAI($3200-$3900) = Smaller GT42R($1400-$2400) This is where things got a little tricky. Perhaps some of you already know, but I didnt, and had to figure it out myself with the specs. The almighty T51's that everyone gets a stiffy over is a GT42R. The difference in price is between the standard bearing and ball bearing options. This is the smaller GT42R measuring 94mm at the exducer. A $1500-$1800 difference. Hey Matt! Did you know you had a T51R KAI on your car?

T51R SPL($3400-$4100) = Bigger GT42R($1400-$2400) Same as above but the T51R SPL is the bigger GT42R with the 102mm exducer compressor wheel. Again, the difference is between standard bearing and ball bearing. The problem with this one, is that most places sell the small or bgi GT42R for the same price. HKS sells them for more. So the difference between the 2 goes up by $200 ($1700-$2000 difference) So if you go and buy the bad boy T51R SPL ball bearing turbo, you just wasted $2000....(and people actaully do)

So there you have it folks. What makes this so sad, is that HKS didnt come up with any of these turbos. They didnt put any R&D into them. They are Garrett turbos....some of them are off the shelf. And I cant imagin what they are paying for turbos. I know about what some shops are paying for turbos/parts. If HKS is the same, they have about a 600% markup on turbos. Friggen 600%??? I cant belive they arent in a lawsuit for price gouging. I dont know about anybody else, but HKS can suck a fatty D ...HARD!!

Sky240PWR
Posts: 1248
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:27 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240SX

Post

wow!!...I have a pt67, they say they put out 780hp on their sight(haven't put it on yet) so thats equal to the T51R right??.......they range from $1000-1200!!(pt67)
Modified by Sky240PWR at 5:33 AM 11/8/2005

bmadd2402
Posts: 341
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 12:01 pm
Car: Twin Turbo-shaft UH-60L, 1992 RB-240sx

Post

you know, the price is jacked up, but I can imagine why. HKS buys the turbos from garrett here in the states, then R&D's them in Japan in their cars, then packages them as HKS, while paying garrett to do so, as well as their racing programs and advertising. THEN we in the states buy them from a market where EVERYTHING is more expensive, and wonder why.

Bluefire
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 6:07 am

Post

Krayton, your post is very misleading. Those prices you posted for the garrett equivalents are not prices for ball bearing turbos. While ALL the HKS turbos are full ballbearing. You should have at least posted ballbearing prices. Also Although very similar, HKS turbos are different from there garrett equivalents. Like bmadd2402 said, the turbos are built by garrett to HKS's specs. Even garrett themselves cannot sell HKS spec'd turbos.

But you were right on the money with the fact that they are overpriced. But I guess some people are willing to pay extra for the added response...

-Bluefire

bmadd2402
Posts: 341
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 12:01 pm
Car: Twin Turbo-shaft UH-60L, 1992 RB-240sx

Post

disregard
Modified by bmadd2402 at 9:42 AM 10/30/2008

Sil240
Posts: 2973
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 5:26 pm
Car: Nissan S13 "The One Cam Wonder"

Post

where would a GT-30R fit in?Im probably just blind, but i didnt see it. Also does anyone know when it would hit full boost on a RB20 aprrox 15psi?

User avatar
DRIFTERx
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 12:54 pm
Car: DRIVING

Post

http://www.turboneticsinc.com/...x.pdf

this should answer most of the "what size turbo?" questions

User avatar
Chaos the Xile
Posts: 789
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 4:56 pm
Car: 1974 Datsun 260Z

Post

With HKS you are buying mostly the name with a purchase

Masterdebater
Posts: 523
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:02 am
Car: 1989 nissan 240sx coupe

Post

their real name is HK$. u pay for the name when u get hks parts.

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

Masterdebater wrote:their real name is HK$. u pay for the name when u get hks parts.
It's true, but I feel so much baller knowing that random jap newspaper is wrapped around a sweet HKS bit I paid too much for.

Edit: ^^^^ for shipping cost of HKS cast manifold

Nismo241
Posts: 207
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 8:51 am
Contact:

Post

HKS turbo's are WAAAYYYY different than a Garrett unit. It's not just the size of the turbine and compressor wheels that make a turbo. The way the housings are designed is what makes an HKS turbo and HKS turbo. I'd gladly pay for an HKS turbo if I could afford it, but for now, I'll stick with garrett.

Sky80
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 11:30 am
Car: '92 240sx Fastback
Contact:

Post

Lol, this thread is full of soo much "well i heard this about HKS turbos" it blows my mind... And krayton who is this master of all masters turbo expert? This is rediculous

Bluefire
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 6:07 am

Post

HOLY CRAP way to revive a thread from 2 YEARS AGO...

Joe
Posts: 6511
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 8:29 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Post

[QUOTE=Sky80]Lol, this thread is full of soo much "well i heard this about HKS turbos" it blows my mind... And krayton who is this master of all masters turbo expert? This is rediculous[/QUOTE

this "master" has forgotten more about turbos than ill ever know. he has the worlds quickest dodge stealth and has tuned some of our friends cars to ridiculous, and reliable numbers.

so you are ridiculous, i vouch trevor's knowledge and his "master" status 100%

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

Nismo241 wrote:HKS turbo's are WAAAYYYY different than a Garrett unit. It's not just the size of the turbine and compressor wheels that make a turbo. The way the housings are designed is what makes an HKS turbo and HKS turbo. I'd gladly pay for an HKS turbo if I could afford it, but for now, I'll stick with garrett.
Keep telling yourself that. My HKS turbo says garrett right on it. Keep beleiving that hype, Hosokawa needs a new mercedes.

User avatar
Dnight07
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:22 pm
Car: s14

Post

what do you guys think about turbonetics gtk's series any good ??, do you guys think they are worth it and crack up to be all that and a bag of chips? planning in buying a bad A turbo for my rb. please let me know what the best thing would be on the street and track hp goal 700whp

Sky80
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 11:30 am
Car: '92 240sx Fastback
Contact:

Post

Kamin wrote:
Sky80 wrote:Lol, this thread is full of soo much "well i heard this about HKS turbos" it blows my mind... And krayton who is this master of all masters turbo expert? This is rediculous[/QUOTE

this "master" has forgotten more about turbos than ill ever know. he has the worlds quickest dodge stealth and has tuned some of our friends cars to ridiculous, and reliable numbers.

so you are ridiculous, i vouch trevor's knowledge and his "master" status 100%
Trevor who? You act like i live next door

steaminhotryce
Posts: 456
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:17 am
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX Sedan
Contact:

Post

Thanks for the chart. This will come in handy for my friend. =)

User avatar
krayton
Posts: 1090
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 11:10 am

Post

Sky80 wrote:
Trevor who? You act like i live next door
Trevor is the one that I posted all the info from. Hes tuned and built some crazy cars. I'm just passing the info along. But whatever you wanna believe.

Kalypso
Posts: 8609
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:10 am

Post

this is sick

Booztd 3
Posts: 708
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:28 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT
Contact:

Post

Easy tip....no confusing turbo names, etc

Take the amount of air the compressor will flow in lb/min and multiply that by 10. That is an acceptable crank HP rating the engine/turbo will make together.

Take 85% of that number and you'll get a pretty close estimate of what WHP you'll get

Example

Turbo flows 66lb/min

66*10 = 660 Crank HP

66*.85 = 560rwhp

You may be able to create more HP, however you risk at running outside of the compressors efficiency range which at that point the air is useless

Cjmartz2k
Posts: 1845
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:39 pm
Car: Hunting for a '89 GTR now
Location: Okinawa, Japan

Post

That's the equation I use. That also, of course, is a ballpark estimate of the max of the turbo. Depending on motor/compressor design, you might have to run retarded high boost to get that.

Booztd 3
Posts: 708
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:28 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT
Contact:

Post

Cjmartz2k wrote:That's the equation I use. That also, of course, is a ballpark estimate of the max of the turbo. Depending on motor/compressor design, you might have to run retarded high boost to get that.
That equation is valid for any engine with a 90-95% VE which is most 'stock-ish' compression, overhead cam designs these days

The max HP is likely what you will see with the boost cranked, because the compressor is rated for the max that it will flow


Cjmartz2k
Posts: 1845
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:39 pm
Car: Hunting for a '89 GTR now
Location: Okinawa, Japan

Post

Interesting. I'd heard figures before on different engine's volumetric efficiency, but they were no where near that. They were like 60 or 70% on honda's, which are supposed to have awesome VE. All this was just second hand BS'ing while drinking over p0ker, so it's with a grain of salt. One thing my car guy points out is that is what the COMPRESSOR can make, not the whole turbo. If you have a really restrictive wheel or ex housing compared to the compressor, you might not get that either.

How accurate do you think that chart is? I've heard very different numbers for some of those turbo's. I didn't think the TO4s/r made that much?

bmadd2402
Posts: 341
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 12:01 pm
Car: Twin Turbo-shaft UH-60L, 1992 RB-240sx

Post

you know who prolly knows the VE for an RB25DET? HKS. You know who prolly doesn't? Garrett. You know who should if you are buying a garrett turbo? The end user. What you are paying for is an engineer to do the math of selecting a suitable turbine for an engine. IE, the GT3071. Bad a$$ turbo. For a honda. Websites say it is a 450 HP turbo, yes, but not on an RB. If you want to know before you buy your turbo how it is going to perform, either ask someone who has that turbo and emulate them, or go with a bolt on solution from a reputable company with a racing team, engineers and what not. and this is a free market.... of course there is a mark-up. thats why there is yahoo.com.jp. just my two pennies. BTW, way to raise the dead.

Cjmartz2k
Posts: 1845
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:39 pm
Car: Hunting for a '89 GTR now
Location: Okinawa, Japan

Post

If you think HKS is researching the VE of RB's and tailoring their turbo's to suit (even though they sell those turbo's for a wide range of motors) then you've watched 2 Fast 2 Furious one to many times. They make there money because (a) people don't know any better and (b) there are so many JDM tight drift spec nut swingers out there promoting there crap. They sell over priced, re-badged crap.

bades
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 1:24 am

Post

nic that helps me out alot


Return to “RB20DET / RB25DET / RB26DETT Forum”