PICTURE! 225/50/15 on 240SX 6" wide alloy!

Forum for Nissan wheel fitment, tire selection, suspension setup and brake discussions.
User avatar
grip_racer
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 5:34 am
Car: 1997 Audi A4 1.8TM

Post

chet, smith, sky, is the contact patch distortion really going to be all that bad?

im not an expert. does this look okay to you? or should i really stick to the 205/55/15?



crzycav86
Posts: 3836
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 1:28 pm
Car: 93 Nissan 240SX KAT

Post

grip_racer wrote:chet, smith, sky, is the contact patch distortion really going to be all that bad?

im not an expert. does this look okay to you? or should i really stick to the 205/55/15?
I can't say that that was a wise move, but since they're on, I guess you've gotta keep them... Yes, you should have kept the stock size.

User avatar
grip_racer
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 5:34 am
Car: 1997 Audi A4 1.8TM

Post

no no, thats not on my car. haha i did google search

Onizuka
Posts: 8450
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 5:24 pm
Car: 91 Nissan S13 coupe SR20DET
89 Nissan S14 hatch SR20DE

Post

After experimenting with wide tires on some-what narrow rims, I can say its totally not worth it. All you add is extra latteral slop, not grip.

User avatar
Exar-Kun
Posts: 4131
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 1:33 pm
Car: 2005 350Z
Contact:

Post

J-Spec Tuner wrote:After experimenting with wide tires on some-what narrow rims, I can say its totally not worth it. All you add is extra latteral slop, not grip.
Your eyes cant see what's happening to the bead stabilizer and sidewall inserts of a tire thats pinched like that. and Yes, you should stick to a 205-55-15 or the stock 195/205-60-15

and that picture proves that somewhere, some guy read that "wider is better" (wait..a pontiac commercial...too bad their 'wide track' GP was 10mm shorter in track than the rpevios gen, and handled like crap) and thusly decided he MUST fit something where it should not go...

Morons abound, sometimes they're hard to point out and ignore.

-Chet

User avatar
skydragoness
Posts: 9394
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 6:49 am
Car: 03' 350z Touring 6spd
92' 240sx 60k survivor :)
Location: North DFW, TEJAS
Contact:

Post

What everybody else said ^^




User avatar
SmithSR
Posts: 5021
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 3:16 pm
Car: 240sx

Post


User avatar
SmithSR
Posts: 5021
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 3:16 pm
Car: 240sx

Post

^^On the ground lie a 205/55-15 on 7"225/50-15 on 7"

This picture isn't as detailed, but in the hi res version one can easily see the difference in sidewall angles.

Both sit well. the 205 looks like it has the most minute stretch. The 225 looks like it has a bit of hot rod style squish. The book recommends 7" as optimal for the 225/50-15.

User avatar
sil80drifter
Posts: 1313
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 5:53 am
Car: 1990 240SX Hatch

Post

If you had a 17" x 7" rim, 225 would sit pretty good on it, right? Since the sidewall would be even smaller, and would not flex as much on a decent radial tire.

sil80

User avatar
Jookmasta
Posts: 5172
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 3:26 pm

Post

i run 215/45/17 for my 17 x 7 rims. 225 made no real difference for contact patch.........

User avatar
sil80drifter
Posts: 1313
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 5:53 am
Car: 1990 240SX Hatch

Post

10mm difference?

sil80

turtl631
Posts: 790
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 7:30 am
Car: S14

Post

I like the tire in the foreground smithSR

User avatar
Exar-Kun
Posts: 4131
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 1:33 pm
Car: 2005 350Z
Contact:

Post

no, contact patch area remains the same, just because the section width gets wider does not necessarilly mean the tire contact patch gets the identical ammount wider, especially when put on a thinner-than-measured wheel...

-Chet

User avatar
nsrZ32
Posts: 20795
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 8:27 am
Car: 90 Nissan 300ZX TT
78 Datsun 280Z
71 Datsun 521 Pickup
98 Nissan Sentra 2.0 SE
02 Nissan Altima 3.5 SE
01 Ford Focus S2
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post

Not smart or effective to run a 225 on a 6" rim, simple as that.

User avatar
sil80drifter
Posts: 1313
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 5:53 am
Car: 1990 240SX Hatch

Post

I was referring to my 17x7 setup above. The sidewall would be smaller than on a 15" rim, and flex les, added to the fact that a good Z rate radial tire sidewall will probably be very close to making that contact patch what it should be on a 225, on a 7" wide rim.

sil80

User avatar
Exar-Kun
Posts: 4131
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 1:33 pm
Car: 2005 350Z
Contact:

Post

actually, the lower the aspect ratio, the more the squeazing of the bead on a smaller-than-ideal rim.

THink about it, the point of a lower aspect ratio sidewall tires is to keep contact aptch distortion down by lower sidewall flex, and increaseing the effective tread width (crown)....by squeazing it, you'd actually be distorting it more than a higher sidewlal tire.

That's why a 225-60-16 works just fine on a 6" or 6.5" wheel (the sidewall has more play, and thusly bows out, then in, as intended )..but a 225-50-16 wouldn't work well at all...the beads are actually further apart; and thusly pinched too much on the narrow wheel.

Something to chew on.

-Chet

User avatar
sil80drifter
Posts: 1313
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 5:53 am
Car: 1990 240SX Hatch

Post

I get it now.. so i'll stick with 215s on my 7" rim. 215/45-17 seems to be almost perfect.

sil80

User avatar
DrifterXRPS13
Posts: 12391
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 4:14 am
Car: 1993 Acura Integra LS, 1998 Nissan 240SX SE 5sp. KA-T,2004 Honda CBR 600RR, 2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600, 2013 Harley Davidson Iron 883, 2014 BMW S1000RR
Location: Vernon Hills, IL
Contact:

Post

not to thread hijack, but smithsr, what kind of wheels are those and what's the sizing on it...i'm looking into buying similar wheels, but the ones i'm looking at are 16x7, and the tires on their are 205/50/16, btw, urs look like 4 lug, the ones i'm getting are 4 lug universals...what size usually, comes in 4 lug universals?....again sorr for thread hijacking...good luck with those tires sil80drifter

User avatar
Exar-Kun
Posts: 4131
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 1:33 pm
Car: 2005 350Z
Contact:

Post

Sil80- you'd be correct. TIre sizingon a accepted rim width depend on a desired result. I prefer to stick to the max grip with minimal distortion sizing reccomendations.




User avatar
SmithSR
Posts: 5021
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 3:16 pm
Car: 240sx

Post

DrifterXRPS13 wrote:not to thread hijack, but smithsr, what kind of wheels are those and what's the sizing on it...i'm looking into buying similar wheels, but the ones i'm looking at are 16x7, and the tires on their are 205/50/16, btw, urs look like 4 lug, the ones i'm getting are 4 lug universals...what size usually, comes in 4 lug universals?....again sorr for thread hijacking...good luck with those tires sil80drifter
The ones on the ground?They are 15x7 +35 4lug!

When people say 4lug universal, they usually refer to a multifit 4lug which usually has the 4-100 and 4-4.5(114.3)


Return to “Nissan Tires, Wheels, Brakes and Suspension”