On a local forum, we were discussing 300zx brakes and master cylinder sizing relating to brake bias. One member used a program and made a nice visual representation from it...... Here's what he concluded:
Matt93SE from houston-imports.com wrote:Also.. took a few minutes to do some calculations on you guys' brake bias assumptions based on which master cylinder you're using...
For this chart, I assumed the cars in question were an S14 and a Z32, which is where the brake specs came from- rotor and pad sizes, master cylinder size and split point for pressures, caliper piston sizes, etc...
I also assumed front wheels would lock at 2600ft-lb of brake torque, which is 1000psi hydraulic pressure with stock front calipers... These are just ballpark assumptions, but are close enough for theoretical work..
As you can see, the stock rears with with Z32 fronts are a BAD idea.
Otherwise, the stock brakes and stock MC have the most front bias, with the full Z32 setup at the most rear-biased.For initial braking, the 1.5% difference in bias is no big deal...At the limit of brakingbefore your front wheels lock up, there is still only about 4.5% difference.
The part that is going to thow people off is when you're braking at about 50% going into a corner. At that point, you're 10% farther to the rear using the Z brakes than you are using the stock S14 brakes.
for you drifters, this is good- you can tap the brakes to get the back end loose easier, then power through it to maintain the slide. for most road course people, this is bad because you DON'T want the back end to come around on you when trail braking. Of course, that can be overridden to a point by keeping your foot in the gas and breathing on the brakes with your left foot.
So take it as you may, but there's the numbers.I didn't take into account anything about pedal feel or pedal travel here. personal preferences will vary on those issues, but the 240 MC running Z32 brakes will be more spongy.
I just thought this was really interesting. What are your thoughts?