qship96 wrote:Fred,I think you are making a huge assumption that the oil CANT be more robust,without actually testing it.I seriously doubt mobil would risk its excellent reputation with this new formulation,if they didnt believe it would test out to be better in actual use.
qship:
I am not saying its a bad oil, its probaly an excellent oil.Its just that there is no free lunch, every advantage has to be paid for, by a disadvanatge elsewhere in the formulation, if equal chemisties are used.
Since the normal Mobil1 is high end as it is, there is not much room for improvement in the chemistry, so trade-off will have to be made somwhere in the formulation.
The only room for improvement would be switching to an even better base oil ,which will enable saving VII's out of the formulation ,which will make more additives of everything else possible.
This is the model that synthetics have over non syns.
I suppose Mobil could go from a group 4 PAO, to a group V like redline, but improvements are likely to be incremental and in any case expensive for the consumer.
Plus ExxonMobil is the biggest producer of PAO's in the world ,wouldnt make sense for them to drop them in a major consumer oil.
For example in Europe you can get castrol SLX and castrol SLX longtec.very similiar synthetic oils, except the Longtec is optimized for long drain intervals.And it works as advertised, <but> the HT/HS an important value in performance applications, is noticably lower, than the regular SLX (which is repackaged and sold in USA as Castrol Syntec 0w-30 ACEA A3, btw)The longtec doesnt make ACEA A3, but ACEA A1 instead, a lesser spec in many ways.(Tho it <does> last longer)
Fred..