Post by
deviousKA »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/deviouska-u9381.html
Fri Feb 04, 2005 6:41 pm
Cams being so important to a decent NA build, the sohc ka24e has a flat out advantage. Cams are cheap, wide variety of grinds available, and easily installed and adjusted for. A sohc with even a very mild performance grind will easily outperform a dohc with stock cams at higher rpms.
The sohc also has an advantage in the weight department, not only in overall weight but in reciprocating valvetrain mass. The dohc has 2 timing chains (one being dual), and 4 timing chain gears vs. one chain and 2 gears of the sohc. Also the sohc obviously has only 1 cam that weighs just about equal to each of the dohc cams. The sohc does have rocker arms that add some weight above the valves (roughly 65% of total rocker weight), although the dohc has buckets and shims that sit on top of its valves (100% of total bucket/shim weight). The sohc has valvesprings with stiffer spring rate and can handle more lift/duration with oem springs.
The 3 valve arrangement of the sohc ka only has a disadvantage in flow in the exhaust (about 30cfm difference, on a flow bench) in stock form. This is somewhat marginal and can be worked to flow equally due to some of the factors ive have listed above as well as others.
What im trying to point out here is that the sohc should not be discounted so easily. Both cylinder heads have their advantages, neither could be called "better" than the other overall. One large advantage of the dohc in NA form is the combustion chamber volume and chamber design. In basic terms, high compression setup is easier to accomplish.
And remember, the fastest KA in existence is a SOHC. That is, unless, there is a dohc ka24de pushing over 700hp running under 8 seconds in the quarter mile and pulling wheel stand in the process.