Nissan Forums | Infiniti Forums NICOclub staff, History and Advertising eMail NICOclub Webmaster Advertising on NICOclub Nissan forums
 
          
Active Topics

Quick Reply  Print  Email  Subscribe RSS  Help
 Positive Crankcase Evacuation ExplainedFirst  1 2 3 >  Last
Author Post
WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Online

17585 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

  Positive Crankcase Evacuation Explained


This is an excellent article that explains the PCV system and the valve itself.

Postive Crankcase Evacuation

Start by reading through that, so you will better understand my opinions on PCV Modification do's and don'ts.

The article mentions that increased mileage on the motor will lead to increased piston blowby. It doesn't mention that increased cylinder pressures also lead to increased blowby. Which means in the best case scenario, you've got at least one factor that leads to increased blowby and two if your motor isn't freshly rebuilt.

Why is that so important?

Because blowby gases contain a bunch of nasty stuff, from unburnt fuel to hydro carbons from the combustion process itself. At best, the combustion process has burnt all of the fuel and you only end up with nasty soot mixing with your oil...that's OK right? No.

Blowby is the #1 reason your oil is black when you change it. So even with the motor running naturally aspirated and the stock PCV System working at 100% you STILL get lots of blowby mixing with the oil. So much so that it turns totally black long before you are scheduled for a change. The oil cleanliness factor determines how fast your bearings wear as well as ALL the other lubricated surfaces in the entire motor. Sounds important when you think of like that huh? It is. Oil isn't changed because it's worn out...it's changed because it's contaminated.

Remember that we:
1) Just increased the cylinder pressures across the board by adding a turbo.
2) If your motor isn't fresh then you're already venting blowby into the oil.
3) If the tune isn't perfect you're adding increased blowby, in this case it's in the form of unburnt fuel. Adding boost requires the tune to be rich in order to not suffer from knock. Most consider this the "safety margin". It isn't bad in itself because it's necessary for most daily drivers. However, if the tune isn't perfect, you're pumping fuel into the oil.
4)Cranked up the load / temperature of the entire motor causing further oil breakdown.

Knowing that, do you still want to take the stock system and weaken it? By that I mean any system or modification to the system that removes vacuum from the crankcase. Obviously we don't like the blowby gases being fed back into the intake manifold. It coats everything with carbon sludge and reduces the effective octane ratio of whatever fuel you'rein using. The next few things are idea's that don't work as well as the stock system. Yes they bypass the recirculation back into the motor, but at the cost of ruining your oil.

Having the valve covers vented to the atmosphere doesn't PULL blowby gases from the sump, it allows them to vent. The venting takes place when the sump fills up with vapor or the heat causes the vapor to rise on it's own. Doesn't sound very effective huh? That's because it isn't.

Having the PCV valve connected to the intake pipe pre-turbo doesn't PULL blowby from the motor. There is NO VACUUM before the turbo. When the turbo is spooled up it does pull quite a bit of air, however, when you're on boost you're also creating the most blowby. You also have to run an air / oil separator in-line so as not to have oil and carbon coat your entire intake tract. But wait, doesn't that just let the gases go back into the intake anyway? Hmm...

Those are the two most common setups that don't work. There are many other options that people have tried, but the fact remains. If you remove vacuum from the sump, you add crap to the oil.

What are our options then?

How about anything the mind can come up with, so long as the sump sees some type of vacuum related evacuation.

I like to keep things simple. So I choose to improve the factory system. I mean why not, it works and it's already in place. What parts can be improved? Well the PCV valve isn't designed for boost, so lets start by either adding an extra check valve that doesn't allow boost to creep past or swapping the stock PCV valve for one that's designed for boost.

The stock air / oil separator isn't ever changed. So lets add a air / oil separator in-line. One that allows us to monitor how much blowby we're actually removing and has changeable filters. I recommend the filters from Home Depot that they use for air compressors. Cheap and easy to install = win. In two simple steps we just increased the effectiveness of the stock system.

Another thing I do is swap oil filters in between oil changes, to cheap and to easy not to do.

Not enough? Want to remove the gas from going to the intake entirely?

You can run a vacuum pump. They can be had in the junkyard for about $40 from any older GM V8. They can be installed where ever because the pump is electric. Simply run an air / oil separator between the PCV valve and the pump and your done. Now you have vacuum even under boosted conditions. You can also buy aftermarket systems that go all the way to $550.

The other thing you can do is run a header mounted evacuation system. They are under $100 but only pull blowby when you're under a load. When idling there won't be enough exhaust flow to create the venturi required to pull the blowby. I also can't say without speculation what rpm and load would be enough to start the venturi effect. I'd use this method combined with the vacuum pump if I wanted the best of both worlds.

Questions?

WD




GODCHSR
Slow Poke



Online

749 posts
1996 Nissan 240sx
Kansas City Mo
10-28-2006

 « Re: Positive Crankcase Evacuation Explained (WDRacing)


Quote, originally posted by WDRacing »

The other thing you can do is run a header mounted evacuation system. They are under $100 but only pull blowby when you're under a load. When idling there won't be enough exhaust flow to create the venturi required to pull the blowby. I also can't say without speculation what rpm and load would be enough to start the venturi effect. I'd use this method combined with the vacuum pump if I wanted the best of both worlds.

WD

This is what I am familiar with.
Your Constructive Criticism of it could also be applied to the factory system though. Without higher RPMs or WOT you don't have a ton of vaccum either... so I think the Exhaust pulling method is best because it creates vacuum and also still has to travel through the Catalytic Convertor for those who are environmentally conscience.




WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Online

17585 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « Re: Positive Crankcase Evacuation Explained (GODCHSR)


I've read some really good things about header systems, however they are usually placed near or at the collector where the exhaust gas velocity is extremely high. In our case they'd be mounted after the O2 sensor which is already at least a foot away from the turbine outlet. So I don't know how much exhaust energy will available or at what rpm range. This method also won't work for those that need to pass the sniffer. Since it dumps a crap load hydrocarbons right onto the cat...lol. But there are ways around it etc...just something to bare in mind.

I'm probably going with the GM Vacuum pump. I've read that if done correctly it actually put enough vacuum on the sump that it stopped a rear main seal leak. That's impressive for a $40 pump and some heater hose...lol.

Combine the 2 and you'd be golden

AZhitman
CEO



Offline

51847 posts
03 G35C s/c, 93 S13 Vert KA-T, 09 Cube, 72 240Z RB25, 63 NL320, 67 WRL411, 67.5 SPL311, 68 510
Phx, AZ
4-29-2002

 « 


B, I want some specifics on that.

I'm just running a breather, and you KNOW how much work I put into my motor... Plus the fact that I kept stock compression (actually probably HIGHER, since it's built to closer tolerances)... I could probably use this.



TEAM NICO: 146,000 Nissan enthusiasts strong.


REGISTER NOW!!!!

NICOclub on Facebook

This site dedicated to the memory of Stacey Lynn Childs 1970-2007

WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Online

17585 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « Re: (AZhitman)


Not a problem brosef.

Here's the Summit Racing Header Mounted Kit, $39 for the whole kit, minus 5/8's hose.

Let me dig up the part numbers for the Electric Pump stuff.

WD

GODCHSR
Slow Poke



Online

749 posts
1996 Nissan 240sx
Kansas City Mo
10-28-2006

 « Re: (WDRacing)


GM part number 12554580

Pretty basic setup

WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Online

17585 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « Re: (GODCHSR)


With that particular pump I believe you have to take it apart and remove a filter from the inside to maximize the suction of the pump. Also, a separator is a must for the GM pumps if you want long life. If oil gets inside they die fairly quickly by everyhting I've read.

That is the pump I'll probably use though. I'm hunting for a few alternatives right now.

Got a link that sells those pumps new?

WD

kouki_hmongster

Offline

249 posts
Want 97 kouki
Pomona ca
6-21-2008

 « Re: (WDRacing)


well explained....now lets hope this clears up all those mix ups. i've been reading other peoples info and most of them are misleading, even on the Ka-t.org.

here's the way i did mine to improve my stock PCV system.
http://forums.nicoclub.com/zer...06595


i like the exhaust gas set-up since it would have vacuum during boost when the PCV closes. Vacuum pump would be really nice too.

I've been really busy but i will take pictures of my setup collecting blowby gas to prove that this really works.

supra33202

Offline

161 posts

San Francisco CA
10-17-2007

 « Re: (WDRacing)


Is there any how-to-install guide for header mounted evacuation system?

http://www.summitracing.com/pa...large

Thanks!

ace0073



Offline

134 posts
1969 datsun 510
huntington beach ca
11-9-2006

 « Re: (supra33202)


similar pump i think:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors....m245

also here is a site that I read on the subject. It has some good info, some not applicable to our setups but good none-the-less:

http://www.dragstuff.com/techa....html

Modified by ace0073 at 6:30 PM 8/26/2009




GODCHSR
Slow Poke



Online

749 posts
1996 Nissan 240sx
Kansas City Mo
10-28-2006

 « Re: (ace0073)


That Ebay link actually looks like it was designed for this purpose. Sweet!
D-UNIT



Offline

672 posts
from a 91' S13 (15.014 @ 94.56mph)
Kaneohe , HI hi
6-24-2003

 « 


So what do you do about tuning. You are releasing metered air out of the system. Blow by or not the pcv system is after the MAF so it is accounted for by the ecu.




154hp and 158ft-lb of torque -- bone stock top and bottom end! <--- @ 176,890 miles - booya!
kouki_hmongster

Offline

249 posts
Want 97 kouki
Pomona ca
6-21-2008

 « Re: (supra33202)


Quote, originally posted by supra33202 »
Is there any how-to-install guide for header mounted evacuation system?

http://www.summitracing.com/pa...large

Thanks!

You seem to have done a lot of research on this but the good thing is i think you finally understand the how the PCV system works. I remember giving you info about my set-up and i guess you ignored it so i didnt care to help...but i guess now you KNOW!

GODCHSR
Slow Poke



Online

749 posts
1996 Nissan 240sx
Kansas City Mo
10-28-2006

 « Re: (D-UNIT)


...

Modified by GODCHSR at 3:33 PM 8/27/2009
WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Online

17585 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « Re: (D-UNIT)


Quote, originally posted by D-UNIT »
So what do you do about tuning. You are releasing metered air out of the system. Blow by or not the pcv system is after the MAF so it is accounted for by the ecu.

Don't mistake what I'm saying. The system will work fine if you add a air / oil separator and a new check valve to the stock setup.

The people that are adding an exhaust mounted evac system and wiring up vacuum pumps should be quite able to tune the car themselves. Or at least they are aware that when you change things on the motor you need to verify the timing and AFR's.

If you're wondering how much of a change this will cause simply unhook the vac line coming from the PCV valve and plug it. Check you AFR's and base timing. Tune accordingly.

WD

trackslut240



Offline

265 posts
1993 Nissan 240SX
chicago IL
8-28-2004

 « Re: (WDRacing)


WD thats an awesome explanation of the whole PCV mystery. thanks
any links to getting the check valve coz i looked one up on mcmaster carr, which seems to do the job well.
http://www.mcmaster.com/#about...e3ue8
the valve i thought of is 7775K61 for $11.97
1/8" cracking pressure .3 psi, also the lowest Cv(Cv factor (coefficient of volume) is the amount of water (in gpm) that will pass through a fully open valve at 1 psi with 1 specific gravity (60° F).)
just need you inputs, thanks

now with the vacuum pump, would it be long lasting on a daily driver? i was thinking of making it run with the check vavle, so it would kick on at idle and WOT(tied in to the TPS). the rest of the time just use the check valve method. maybe i am wringing my brain too much?
this pcv is no joke, the tuner shop i went to for some welding told me to vent it atmosphere...

koukiKA240
Track Feind



Offline

566 posts
1991 240sx KA-T
Houston Texas
5-25-2004

 « 


what about a system that sources a vacuum before the turbo after the MAF, to a oil seperator, to the engine?

If running the vacuum pump would a catch tank with baffles and packing be enough to protect the pump?

Modified by koukiKA240 at 3:24 AM 8/29/2009

GODCHSR
Slow Poke



Online

749 posts
1996 Nissan 240sx
Kansas City Mo
10-28-2006

 « Re: (trackslut240)


Quote, originally posted by trackslut240 »

this pcv is no joke, the tuner shop i went to for some welding told me to vent it atmosphere...

To be fair though, that will prevent the RMS from blowing out... because the 'mini' filter becomes the path of least resistance.

It just won't increase oil life.

WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Online

17585 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « Re: (koukiKA240)


Quote, originally posted by koukiKA240 »
what about a system that sources a vacuum before the turbo after the MAF, to a oil seperator, to the engine?

If running the vacuum pump would a catch tank with baffles and packing be enough to protect the pump?


Modified by koukiKA240 at 3:24 AM 8/29/2009

Did you read the part that said THERE IS NO VACUUM BEFORE THE TURBO? You can't source something that isn't there. Vacuum is created by a force pulling air against a restriction. You have air being pulled through the turbo but there is no restriction on the other end to cause the vacuum.

Does that help?

Quote, originally posted by trackslut240 »
WD thats an awesome explanation of the whole PCV mystery. thanks
any links to getting the check valve coz i looked one up on mcmaster carr, which seems to do the job well.
http://www.mcmaster.com/#about...e3ue8
the valve i thought of is 7775K61 for $11.97
1/8" cracking pressure .3 psi, also the lowest Cv(Cv factor (coefficient of volume) is the amount of water (in gpm) that will pass through a fully open valve at 1 psi with 1 specific gravity (60° F).)
just need you inputs, thanks

now with the vacuum pump, would it be long lasting on a daily driver? i was thinking of making it run with the check vavle, so it would kick on at idle and WOT(tied in to the TPS). the rest of the time just use the check valve method. maybe i am wringing my brain too much?
this pcv is no joke, the tuner shop i went to for some welding told me to vent it atmosphere...

I don't know if I'd use the valve in your link.

I know for a fact that the PCV from the 87 Buick GNX will work very well and it's only $3 and available at any Autozone

Buick GNX PCV Valve

You can either ADD that one inline or replace the stock one with it. I'd add it in

WD

trackslut240



Offline

265 posts
1993 Nissan 240SX
chicago IL
8-28-2004

 « Re: (WDRacing)


thanks WD, that should make my oil life more than 1500 miles, now to get back to work and get that motor running.

+1 for Sticky!!

Daily Driven 240

Offline

60 posts
s-13
montreal qc
3-27-2007

 « Re: (trackslut240)


thanks WD for the buick pcv valve alternative, i was looking for one way check valves for air compressors but it seems that around were i live it isnt easy to find. The 87 buick gnx pcv valve it is then.
WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Online

17585 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « Re: (Daily Driven 240)


You guys have Autozone up in Canada?
Chris28



Offline

2132 posts
92 s13 KA-T
757 VA
7-14-2007

 « Re: (WDRacing)


Hmmmm maybe this is why I can't get my oil pan to seal. It's warped, but I figured enough RTV would seal it.

When my engine is out in a few weeks I'm planning on installing a check valve and a home depot filter.




http://ignitesoul.blogspot.com/
shimizu_17



Offline

300 posts

Yuba City ca
2-23-2004

 « Re: (Chris28)


Good thread thanks WD




Daily Driven 240

Offline

60 posts
s-13
montreal qc
3-27-2007

 « Re: (WDRacing)


we have alot of auto parts stores just their not called autozone, but im sure i wont have a hard time finding the buick gnx pcv valve, it was the one way check valves for air compressors i was having a hard time finding.

so thanks for the alternative makes my life easier.

Chris28



Offline

2132 posts
92 s13 KA-T
757 VA
7-14-2007

 « Re: (Daily Driven 240)


Wait, so that Buick PCV valve is a check valve?
WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Online

17585 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « Re: (Daily Driven 240)


Quote, originally posted by Daily Driven 240 »
we have alot of auto parts stores just their not called autozone, but im sure i wont have a hard time finding the buick gnx pcv valve, it was the one way check valves for air compressors i was having a hard time finding.

so thanks for the alternative makes my life easier.

I was just messing with you, I like to give all our Northern members a hard time The staff guys we have up your way catch hell in the Mod forum

Quote, originally posted by Chris28 »
Wait, so that Buick PCV valve is a check valve?

A PCV valve IS a check valve. All it does is allow liquid or gas to move in one direction. Any reverse flow closes the valve.

WD

Daily Driven 240

Offline

60 posts
s-13
montreal qc
3-27-2007

 « Re: (WDRacing)


thanks for the warm welcome WD lol.
supra33202

Offline

161 posts

San Francisco CA
10-17-2007

 « Re: (kouki_hmongster)


Quote, originally posted by kouki_hmongster »
well explained....now lets hope this clears up all those mix ups. i've been reading other peoples info and most of them are misleading, even on the Ka-t.org.

here's the way i did mine to improve my stock PCV system.
http://forums.nicoclub.com/zer...06595


i like the exhaust gas set-up since it would have vacuum during boost when the PCV closes. Vacuum pump would be really nice too.

I've been really busy but i will take pictures of my setup collecting blowby gas to prove that this really works.

Looking forward for your pictures.

redhb240SXS13

Offline

380 posts
1992 240sx Coupe and 1995 240sx
Greenwood IN
11-17-2006

 « Re: (supra33202)


So WD, what your suggesting is to run the stock PCV valve to a check valve, out of the check valve to a catch can/ oil separator, and back into the four ports on the bottom of the upper intake mani? I heard people plug those holes because they are a common boost leak nuiscense. If thats the case where would you suggest returning the air back into the system at?

I may be completely off on this, still getting a grip on this PCV business.



WTB S13 Hatch Shell in or around IN. E-mail is in profile.


supra33202

Offline

161 posts

San Francisco CA
10-17-2007

 « Re: (redhb240SXS13)


Quote, originally posted by redhb240SXS13 »
So WD, what your suggesting is to run the stock PCV valve to a check valve, out of the check valve to a catch can/ oil separator, and back into the four ports on the bottom of the upper intake mani? I heard people plug those holes because they are a common boost leak nuiscense. If thats the case where would you suggest returning the air back into the system at?

I may be completely off on this, still getting a grip on this PCV business.

Actually, I have the same question.

So WD, what's your opinion on removing the PCV system and plug those holes in regards to the risk of boost leak?

http://www.ka-t.org/forums/vie...f5ca7

WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Online

17585 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « Re: (supra33202)


Every vacuum line is a potential boost leak. Just replace the lines and use tie straps or even a drop of super glue.

Or just lose the PCV system entirely like I described above. Worrying about a "possible" boost leak isn't worth not having crankcase evacuation. Don't believe anyone that says different, they simply don't understand.

WD

supra33202

Offline

161 posts

San Francisco CA
10-17-2007

 « Re: (WDRacing)


Hopefully, kouki_hmongster or other people can show us some pictures for their improved PCV system setup. It would clear alot of things.

WD, thanks for your input.

Ruff Ryder 6

Offline

120 posts
1990 240sx coupe, 1990 N/A 300zx
Maryville TN
4-15-2006

 « Re: (WDRacing)


So have you completed your setup yet? I am wanting to go hunt for a pump in the 'yard but wondered which one you went with.



Buy my engine and exhaust parts: http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread/335980

neverlift
Mad Thrasher



Offline

3288 posts
PIGNOSE #19 turbo piggy
sunshinestate
4-24-2006

 « Re: (Ruff Ryder 6)


this should be sticky as hell wd

I have pics somewhere of the last time I cleaned mine, it was a tar like substance that smelled like burnt fuel and oil nasty as f***.


I know it works better cause I had the line kinked due to a hasty engine install, my oil lasted only 1500ish miles before I felt the NEED to change it....
500 mile mark normally the oil has turned and it now stays that golden color longer.

Glad a thread with research and info has landed, dont let it fall off the front page maybe people will find it



PIGNOSE SQUAD MEMBER # 19

someone buy my wheels http://forums.nicoclub.com/zer...57581

----------------------------------
r.i.p. Dad I miss you
06/14/54~04/18/09
----------------------------------
r.i.p. Lee
09/01/89~09/28/06

WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Online

17585 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « Re: (neverlift)


It's already in the sticky homegirl I did contemplate sticking this thread all by itself. I think this topic slips 90% of most DIY guys minds during a project

WD

neverlift
Mad Thrasher



Offline

3288 posts
PIGNOSE #19 turbo piggy
sunshinestate
4-24-2006

 « Re: (WDRacing)


girlfriend you dont even know how long I went with my vc just ota as well as the pcv :barf
supra33202

Offline

161 posts

San Francisco CA
10-17-2007

 « 


Any pictures after the installation?


neverlift
Mad Thrasher



Offline

3288 posts
PIGNOSE #19 turbo piggy
sunshinestate
4-24-2006

 « Re: (supra33202)


its real simple actually, I just got some hose and an oil/air seporator from one of may favorite tuning shops(harbor freight ) then run one end of hose to the stock pcv and the other to the 4:1 tee coming off the manifold cut it where you want to place your separator, if you get the one like me use a small bolt and hose to keep it from being a vac leak.


It does have some flaws to it, but it gets the job done.
it has ups and downs.
The thing has no filter which was a plus when I cleaned it ,a little dawn in both sides ,rub a little and its sparkly clean again. But the design is to let the oil drip out of the bottom, fine and dandy on a air line for tools and what not but not so hot as its a vac leak, thats when you put the plug on.The leak is minute but there as you can hear a clear hiss unless its blocked..

I'll go snap a shot, I didnt clean it with my last oil change so it should be dirty still.

WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Online

17585 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « Re: (neverlift)


Dirty is good because it'll show how much oil/carbon would have ended up INSIDE the intake manifold otherwise. Put steel wool inside the seperator to assist in removing the oil from the air. I'd come up with a valve or something for the hole in the bottom. Any leak is a bad thing IMO.
 First  1 2 3 >  Last

» Return to KA24ET / KA24DET Forum
Forum Jump
Quick Reply

Powered by ZeroForum 2.4.0. ©2008 RelyNet, Inc.



< Contact Us - NICO >

Visit G37Driver.com for Infiniti G37 Information
NICOclub's Nissan forums and Infiniti forums and all affiliated sites are the property of HDS Holdings, Inc. They are independent publications and are not affiliated with or endorsed by Nissan Motor Company or Nissan North America.

Information © Copyright © 2000-2009 by NICOclub
All rights reserved. Material may not be copied or reprinted without written permission.
Visit 370zclub.org for Nissan 370z Information

Google
Web NICOclub.com



Nissan Sport Magazine Forums
Nissan Infiniti Events and Shows Nissan Infiniti Road Tests and Reviews
Nissan Infiniti Related Articles Nissan Infiniti Technical Information Articles
Nissan Financing Advice Nissan Infiniti News Archive
240sx performance modification articles and information Nissan performance and modification
Infiniti performance and modification Nissan Infiniti Car Owners Homepage
Nissan Infiniti Parts Marketplace


Nissan Infiniti Links


Do NOT copy content, plagiarism will be detected by Copyscape.

Home Photography Camera Information and Help

Racing maps and locations