Z32 NA Auto ring gear is the smallest.T45 wrote:It's not the bellhousing that's the limiting factor, it's the flywheel you will use that lines up differently on the Q starter because it's designed for the auto ring gear. There are people that have popped off the ring gear and transferred it over to the manual flywheel and I believe it worked. There are a few threads on this if you look through old posts.
Also bare(sp?) in mind that the 350z/G35 6-speed has no speedo sending unit built into the transmission.Ford Falcon wrote:I'd like to use the 350Z/G35 6-speed transmission with my VH45.
hydralic throwout explained below, just have a gander.http://www.weirhotrodproducts.com/id2.h ... ec...s.htmEMK wrote: If you go in between the trans and the bell housing aren't there some drawbacks? If not why have people been wasting so much money on the adapters at the bell housing engine interface. Not flaming here just kinda wondering why nobody seems to mention it because I'm sure we've all thought about it.
And can you explain this in further detail I'm not quite sure I understand what you're saying about the clutch, throwout bearing, and slave cylinder.
Thats what i want to do to this next project I am starting, but the big problem is mating them flush in line to have no vibrations, balance issues.Ford Falcon wrote:I'd like to use the 350Z/G35 6-speed transmission with my VH45. Has anyone done this, and if not, can this be done without much modification (besides the adapter plate)?
My intention is to chop the first 3 or so inches from Q45 bellhousing, and weld it to the G35 bellhousing (with 3 or so inches taken off that). I've only seen the transmission once, and don't have easy access to photos and dimensions, so I've not checked how the starter motor will fit.
Any ideas?
NOT with a tremec with 2 od'sBorg Warner 6sp T-56 Gear Ratios 1st 2.66:1 2nd 1.78:1 3rd 1.30:1 4th 1.00:1 5th 0.74:1 6th 0.50:1so really same gear changes to 5th, then an extra one for low rev'n cruising, why is that worse, no one can explain why except when they talk in comparison to a 350z 6 spd........the t56 looks like the simplest option especially when you have tight space constraints when you can use the hyd throwout as shown in links above.they are plentiful here in aus and i dare say the USA too, put your hard earned cash into one of these with less headache????use the 300zx na flywhel, flip the ring gear and the vh jdm starter meshes, how hard is that? the grab a 300zx NA clutch (aftermarket heavier if you please) use a Gm / tremec type spline on the clutch driven disc, with the right OD for the pressure plate used, use the hyd throwout with appropriate size throwout bearing installed and spaced to operate effectivly and thats pretty much the swap bar the tailshaft and hydraulic master cyl & mounting crossmember.Carl H wrote:6spd = more shifts for the same speed.
You know, I think it's more of a crowd mentality. Someone did the Z32 so many just go for what they know works. I actually was wondering if the T-56 thing might work a while ago. After seeing your post, I'm gonna try to grab one (or at least get all the dim's on it) and see how tough it'd be. The nice thing is, T-56's are in abundance; probably more than Z32's and there is a bigger aftermarket for beefing up the T-56. Gotta check the weights, however. Anyways, I will try to work with someone to get a proper spacer plate designed and post the print for it. Easy enough to print it out and take it to a machine shop to have them cut one out. That way there is no freight for machining a bellhousing and/or no risk with some of the current VG<->VH spacers.nat0Z wrote:NOT with a tremec with 2 od'sBorg Warner 6sp T-56 Gear Ratios 1st 2.66:1 2nd 1.78:1 3rd 1.30:1 4th 1.00:1 5th 0.74:1 6th 0.50:1so really same gear changes to 5th, then an extra one for low rev'n cruising, why is that worse, no one can explain why except when they talk in comparison to a 350z 6 spd........the t56 looks like the simplest option especially when you have tight space constraints when you can use the hyd throwout as shown in links above.they are plentiful here in aus and i dare say the USA too, put your hard earned cash into one of these with less headache????use the 300zx na flywhel, flip the ring gear and the vh jdm starter meshes, how hard is that? the grab a 300zx NA clutch (aftermarket heavier if you please) use a Gm / tremec type spline on the clutch driven disc, with the right OD for the pressure plate used, use the hyd throwout with appropriate size throwout bearing installed and spaced to operate effectivly and thats pretty much the swap bar the tailshaft and hydraulic master cyl & mounting crossmember.
I dont know if im stupid or everyone being cheap is?? what worth more???
cheers nat0not venting, but i need to get accross to people that are being bum steered into a 300zx / rb box swap with heaps of headache.