More likely ADM and Conagra can be thanked for this bit of Green hoax.Ethanol at any concentration is corrosive to mild steel. Flex fuel cars have the fuel system in stainless steel.AZhitman wrote:Either way, blame the greenies for yet another absurd and patently useless money-waster, foisted on the populace through Chicken Little scare tactics.
In general, you'll get 10% less fuel economy as a molecule of ethanol has 6% less potential energy than a molecule of gasoline. Also, switching from blended to non-blended will kill your catalytic converter.jadeM45 wrote:I see them popping up all over the place in FLA. The crappy thing is that the gas is no cheaper than the non blended stuff. From what I have seen and read we are ok up to 10% without it affecting the engines. Anything over that it will cause issues.
I would love to see a comapro on gas wit and without on a dyno and mileage wise.
Unless the engine was designed to run on E85, it simply will not work. It's not isolated to German cars. I know that E85 won't work in my Rav4, Maxima or M45 because it's E85 and not regular fuel.auditech10 wrote:We have had maybe 20 cars come into my dealership, within the last two months, where the customer has put in E85 and it seems that German engines just will not run on this. We have to drain the fuel tank at the least and let me tell you, that will probably be the most expensive tank of gas you can find, after the job is all done.
Why do they use E85? I think the cost savings per gallon is erroded by poorer milage. Probably not much savings and it will eventually ruin their engine, if it was not designed for E85.auditech10 wrote:I know more than a dozen people that have older Chevys, mid 90s-mid 2000s, that use e85 and neither of them have complained about anything nor have they had any problems at all. I highly doubt that any of those cars/trucks were designed to use e85, but i dont know.