Are you taking the speedo error into account in these calculations?mcrews wrote:I went from the stock 245/45/18 to a 255/45/18 on my F50 02 sport.I drive alot on the highway and saw an INCREASE in my fuel average from 24mpg to 26.2 mpg.
I ran this test over the same stretgh of road in similar weather.....geez, all the weather is the same in CA!!!!!
I also run a higher tire presure, close to 43 lbs.
I agree that much larger tires will hurt gas mileage.I went with the larger diameter because of the amount of time I am on the road
mark
Exactly.I imagine the guy going from stock 15" steelies with 195/70/15s to a set of aluminum 17s with some 225/50/17 on his Accord will see benefits rather than losses in the fuel economy.elwesso wrote:That article assumes that the consumer goes from a well designed OEM wheel to a boat anchor HUGE wheel with inadequate tires... Which, in all honesty, is the correct assumption to make based on what basically everyone chooses their wheels on..
i want to get a 20but it's not fesable in HK as the road condition is badthewaxynoodle wrote:ive got 20's on my q45theres a noticable decrease in fuel efficiency
bigdog76 wrote:Well I increased my stock tire size on the Q for the standard 215'S to 225 and there was no noticiable change at all. Rim size did not change.
One should also keep in mind all the other wear items the brakes, the suspension, all that is effected by thoses 20's and up.
I use to have 22" on my Cadillac EXT I took them off and was suprised how much better it could stop when I hit the break and much lighter.
Rims are a thing of the past with all the car manfuactures coming out with nice size good looking rims. Rim companies will have a hard time selling what they did in the late 99's and early 2000's.
If I may play Devil's Advocate here.Victor wrote:Article in today's LA Times says pimping your car with bigger rims and wider low profile tires decreases gas mileage. Says 20% of your fuel goes to overcoming rolling resistance from tires. The bigger and wider the tire, the more rolling resistance. Article says also to not use rain tires if you drive on mostly dry roads. Also, worn tires get better gas mileage than new tires since they have less tread on them, plus are smaller diameter. The larger the rim size, the worse the performance because of rotational inertia being much higher for a 17 or 20 inch rim than a 15 or 16 inch. The lighter the wheel the better, like the forged rims on a J30T being much better for performance than heavier cast rims. There can be as much as a 10% difference in gas mileage between using best and worst tire for your car. Generally one should stick with the tires that the car manufacturer supplied when new. Large tires are also less aerodynamic than smaller tires, adding extra air resistance to the rolling resistance. Article says the tire industry is fighting a proposed law to make them list the rolling resistance of their tires.
I have. It is a very astute observation.qship96 wrote:Strange thing is that the poor people tend to be the ones putting the big shiny wheels on their cars. I have noticed as I drive thru expensive neighborhoods most cars have stock wheels on them, yet when I drive thru inexpensive neighborhoods or the rundown parts of the city, almost all the cars have big shiny wheels- anyone else notice this in their area?
Well I own chrome wheels and I've never complained about the "white man" holding me back so please watch your statement because we "all" don't think like that idiot! I'm a little over a year out of college with my electrical engineering degree and I was blessed with a very nice salary. So I guess there some people in this world who would judge me as a thug or uneducated because I have chrome 20" wheels, but in reality I'm probably more intelligent than they. If people want rims on their car in their poor neighborhoods, then that ignorance is on them. I mean, I feel that people who drive ugly minivans are digusting. Why not just get a nice SUV. But that's their preference not mine.Haitian_King wrote:Ugh. It saddens me. Disgusts me as well. For all their complaining about the "White Man", they're doing a great job holding themselves down and setting themselves back.
Because there is nothing wrong with the term "homeboy". I have quite a few back home in Alabama. I just realize that people have different taste so I stopped arguing about it. I have 20" wheels and I love it. I do notice during the winter months that I save a small amount of gas because of the weight load taken off of my car. At the end of the day, it's all about different people preference (e.g. VIP styling)Haitian_King wrote:I'm not looking to have this thread locked, but I feel compelled to defend myself against allegations of ignorance.
References to homeboyz and 40 ounces and dub wheels are constantly made on the board, especially in regards to people that try to slap large wheels on Q's and other sedans.
I've never seen you up in arms about that.
True...Back home in the southern states especially Alabama, Mississippi, and some areas of Georgia, there are rural broke down areas they are constantly getting busted for the production meth. So do I go out on the limb and think that all of them in the area are "country bumpkin meth heads" because of the negative connotations of a few shown on tv? No; that's what I stated was ignorance thinking. Back to my previous post...if they decide to do stupid stuff like that then that's their choice. What I'm trying to get you to understand is that "all" don't curse "The White Man". I mean, they might be happy in that type of environment.Haitian_King wrote:My previous post was about people living in economically depressed areas (statistically a majority of the inhabitants are of African-American descent) spending thousands of dollars on big wheels, while their home, families, and communities are in terrible states of disrepair. After such ludicrous expenditures, they then turn around curse "The White Man". (I know, I've heard them do it.)
Has that gotten you in trouble with the law?Jeff Williams wrote:I have 285/40/18 rear tires and 245/45/18 front tires on my 1994 Q45t, and I still get 20 MPG on the highway. Of course, when my speedo says I am going 72, the car is really going about 80, so the reduction in RPM has helped offset the excessive width and weight of the rear tires.
My car came from the factory with the light weight BBS wheels, and I am running the light weight ASA (BBS) wheels.
Rex,maybe I'm making a false assumption.But a larger tire will roll farther than a smaller tire.Thus for the same rpm you get more distance?I realize that to start rolling there is probably more energy(rpm) used, but once you are on the way, the larger tire would give better mpg?Rex wrote:
Are you taking the speedo error into account in these calculations?
I was just inquiring about the "correction". Since those 2 tires have different diameters (thus different circumferences), the speed and distance traveled as shown on the speedo will not be accurate for both without "correction". It's not a significant error given the sizes you listed, but nonetheless there's an "error". If my mind is working correct today, your speedo will be over stating both speed and distance, thus your number may be even better than your calculations reflect by ~1.3%.mcrews wrote:Rex,maybe I'm making a false assumption.But a larger tire will roll farther than a smaller tire.Thus for the same rpm you get more distance?I realize that to start rolling there is probably more energy(rpm) used, but once you are on the way, the larger tire would give better mpg?
mark