93HATCH240
Offline
629 posts
1993 NISSAN 240SX HATCH
SHIRLEY NEW YORK
5-17-2006
|
| « Re: Turbo or supercharger? (rroderiques77) | 11:06 AM 12/7/2007 |
|
idk much about turbo or supercharger 5.5 gens. Id check out maxima.org. They have alot i mean alot of info there. Just register and search. Sorry mods for linking to another forum but its been a week and no1 answered this person. Thats the best I could do for you.
1993 240sx-Super hicas-SOLD 10-4-07
Currently- 2002 Nissan Maxima
|
kzoosho
Offline
322 posts
Turboed 1997 Nissan Maxima SE
Grand Rapids michigan
12-26-2007
|
| « Re: Turbo or supercharger? (rroderiques77) | 1:43 PM 12/31/2007 |
|
If you go the the org its 20 bucks to search as a donation. And also with you being a 5.5 gen and a 3.5 it makes it a lil harder. I would deff check the org.
1997 Maxima Turbonetics 60-1 550cc injectors q45 maf safcII and running great.
1999 Maxima V1 Vortech 370cc injectors Z32 maf and SafcII auto with modded VB
|
maxlineGTR
Offline
2 posts
A32/ S14
W Covina ca
12-26-2007
|
| « Re: Turbo or supercharger? (rroderiques77) | 11:57 AM 3/17/2008 |
|
If you Supercharge or Turbocharge....tuning the ECU would be last...you would need proper fuel management and what not to get it running properly...I am from the org. check out: http://forums.maxima.org/forum...&f=38 check the the FAQs before anything.
|
Bill Budych
Offline
3 posts
2002 nissan maxima gle
Eldorado Wi
4-7-2008
|
I was wondering if a vq30de turbo kit would fit on a vq35de engine???
|
zZ_NiTTo
Offline
0 posts
Nissan 240sx s13 hatch
waukesha WI
4-13-2008
|
supercharge it
|
97A32
Offline
14 posts
97 Maxima SE
Carrollton Tx
4-20-2008
|
| « Re: (zZ_NiTTo) | 1:44 PM 4/20/2008 |
|
i would say supercharger seeing as it would be easier to package.. just my .02
|
rmezz13
350Z Moderator
Offline
1491 posts
2004.5 Nissan 350z Performance
Columbus OH
11-27-2007
|
| « Re: Turbo or supercharger? (rroderiques77) | 3:07 AM 4/28/2008 |
|
turbo would be awesome with more options down the road, but with low boost, and the fact you don't want to tune it often, a SC would benefit you, plus with SC you have no lag..... All the power is there when you start the car. So for what you seem to want, try to find an SC which would be harder then just fabricating a turbo kit i would imagine.... i don't know though, maybe talk to some manufacturers of 350z superchargers and see what they say about slapping one on the Maxima..... Good luck and let us know what you find out!
350z Forum
350zClub.org
NICO Home
| Quote, originally posted by R350Zz33 » | | i was just lookin to fill the third hole?. |
|
kzoosho
Offline
322 posts
Turboed 1997 Nissan Maxima SE
Grand Rapids michigan
12-26-2007
|
| « Re: Turbo or supercharger? (rmezz13) | 11:26 AM 5/4/2008 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by rmezz13 » | | turbo would be awesome with more options down the road, but with low boost, and the fact you don't want to tune it often, a SC would benefit you, plus with SC you have no lag..... All the power is there when you start the car. So for what you seem to want, try to find an SC which would be harder then just fabricating a turbo kit i would imagine.... i don't know though, maybe talk to some manufacturers of 350z superchargers and see what they say about slapping one on the Maxima..... Good luck and let us know what you find out! |
Well unless its a positive displacement blower there is still lag so the whole s/c having no lag is not true . They still lag. Turbo;s do take more to fabricate but in the end have more power per psi. Also the turbo doesnt take power to make power the s/c does. In the end its completely up to the owner on what route to go. I have one of each but to be honest i will have 2 turbo cars by then end of next year.
|
| |
