Nissan Forums | Infiniti Forums NICOclub staff, History and Advertising eMail NICOclub Webmaster Advertising on NICOclub Nissan forums
 
          
Active Topics

Quick Reply  Print  Email  Subscribe RSS  Help
 Adding a Turbo to a Stock KA24 (Noobs Read)First  1 2 3 4 >  Last
Author Post
WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Offline

16864 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

  What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (Noobs Read)


Hi, allow me to welcome you to Nico and KAT. If you've been a member for awhile now, well its about time you're interested in going turbo.

There has been a rash of threads and questions related to how much boost or how much horsepower a stock motor can handle before things start to break. I'm going to do my best to explain how and why things happen the way they do.

The KA24E and KA24DE are both very fun motors when boosted. They can be used for high horsepower drag cars or low boost dependable daily drivers. The selection of parts and where money is invested will determine exactly how and why things are going to happen to your motor.

First, lets start off with making sure the current motor and car are in fairly good condition. By that I mean the motor runs perfectly fine as it sits right now and the car isn't going to fall apart. Trust me, if you have any problems, adding boost is only going to compound them greatly.

Aside from running well and being mechanically sound there are a few things that should be looked at closely. One is the compression on all 4 cylinders. If you don't have a compression tester, I suggest buying one. They are about $30 from Sears where I bought mine. But they can be found at most auto parts stores. You're going to want compression numbers over 155 on all 4 cylinders and they should be within 10 psi of each other for the best results. If they are lower, I'd suggest a full rebuild before going with a turbo kit.

The next key part is the oil system. Its hard to tell the exact pressure without a standalone aftermarket gauge. But you'll want want 15psi or more at idle and over 30psi once the rpms have gone past 3000. Those are for an engine that's already warmed up. If its cold, they will be ALOT higher. Don't use those numbers. However, if you have low oil pressure when cold, and the car has been running for more then 2 minutes, shut the car off and inspect the oil system. Hopefully its just low oil level.

The coolant system should also be working well. Adding a turbo creates more heat inside the motor and more heat under the hood. So a good cooling system is a must have. The factory system will work fine for a low boost setup. Just make sure you keep an eye on things. Overheating a turbo motor will lead to detonation and can wreak havoc on every system in the car. You'll never hear people say, "Man, what a waste of money he put into that cooling system". If you do, chances are they don't know what they're talking about.

The last main system that needs to be inspected is the ignition system. Adding a turbo will require you to use a different spark plug. One that is one or two heat ranges colder. You'll also use a shorter plug Gap then stock. Start with BKR7E from NGK and gap them to .038 and close the gap as you run into spark issues. But that's a whole story by itself. If you want to change the wires while you're swapping plugs, might as well. There is no such thing as having something work "To Well".

With all that said, lets move on to the actual point of this thread. The stock internals in a mechanically sound motor will take a good bit of power. We have members pushing close to 500WHP on a factory parts. But we've also had motors fail in the 300's and 400's. A lot of this is do to poor tuning and or not taking care of the motor.

If the engine oil is changed frequently, then there should be no issues with the bearings seizing up. Clean oil is always a good thing. I relate some of the problems people have had to lubrication issues.

As far as tuning goes, money is the only thing that will limit your options. You have to really consider your end goal. Will a simple piggy back SAFCII or Greddy Emanage be good enough? Or should I look into Rom tuning or Standalone Ecu's? Well both work well for what they are. Cheap piggy back setups are good for making a small but fun amount of power. But if your needs are over 300, then I'd start exploring other options. The whole point of tuning is that without a good safe Air/Fuel mixture and the proper timing retard on boost. You could have the motor built with titanium parts and it will still break.

Finally, once you've got everything working correctly and you've decided on what method you're going to use for tuning. You come to the most important choice of all in my mind and that's what parts to buy or what kit to use. Every part in a system will have a max output. If that max output is lower then what your goals, then don't buy it. Trust me, settling on something will always haunt you. If you have to save for a few extra months to get what you want, then so be it. There are a lot of good deals to be found and a lot of choices that will work very well. But there are just as many bad choices along the way. Beware what you buy from EBay, some things just shouldn't be bought from a generic company. There is a lot of information in the KAT forum as a whole and a lot in the FAQ at the top of the page. If you can't find it there, then ask away. But please read through things at least a little before rattling off questions that are probably posted on the very first page already. A little research in the beginning will yield fantastic results later.

All of this comes to a close with me voicing my opinion and saying a safe bet for a sound motor when tuned properly is about 350WHP. Some will go farther, some will not. If my goals were more then 350WHP, I'd seriously consider saving for forged internals.

I hope this has helped some of you out. Never be afraid to ask questions. Worst case we'll just tell you where to look.

If you have questions after reading this please make a new thread. You won't be flamed for asking.

Happy Boosting
WD



Truth is Treason in the Kingdom of Lies - Ron Paul


capwred

Offline

598 posts

attalla al
7-28-2005

 « 


One of the best write ups i have seen.

Thanks




ca18det powered 240sx
http://www.alabamagz.com

Florida240sx
Moderator



Offline

11625 posts
93 Hatch 5spd 93 vert 89 hatch
DeLand FL
7-1-2004

 « 


Good write-up. Really needed since all the "new" people lately.... some of them were a bit cocky....



http://www.itsfunnyhoney.com/v..._time

KA-T why settle for anything less?

eazye2000
Booze Hound



Offline

1748 posts
of FAIL...
Inverness FL
6-27-2005

 « Re: (Florida240sx)


Quote, originally posted by Florida240sx »
Really needed since all the "new" people.... some of them were a bit cocky....

Man, why you guys have to call me out like that?!

Just kidding. Glad to see someone posted something like this.

*edit* Sorry, had to fix it.. I couldn't make fun of WD like that.....'lord I apologize....' Don't wanna piss him off, he don't talk to me on AIM anymore.. LoL

Modified by eazye2000 at 8:40 PM 2/6/2007



Car is For Sale: http://forums.nicoclub.com/zer...56205



babowc
KDM-NESS



Offline

3100 posts
240sx
Lawrenceville/Suwanee GA
10-25-2004

 « 


sounds good.
the thing is however.. none of the noobs search...
haha, i hope you guys sticky this in bright pink flashing letters, so newbs will actually NOTICE this.. instead of cluttering the ka-t sub-forum.
XingYu



Offline

353 posts
1993 Nissan 240SX
2-1-2005

 « 


Great write up!

+1 for the sticky~




R.I.P 1989 Nissan 240SX SE 3.6.04 - 7.12.05 Sold
R.I.P 1993 Nissan 240SX SE 7.31.05 - 12.11.05 STOLEN!
NEW 1993 Nissan 240SX Base 1.10.06
NateDogg

Offline

811 posts

8-24-2002

 « 


Yes just make the title "OMG 1000WHP KA-T STOCK BLOCK!"

Also, dont forget those poor SOHC engines dont have the same compression as DOHC engines. So when doing a compression test, maybe you should put a lower number for them. IMO compression should be above 165+-10psi for DOHC.

zanilth

Offline

164 posts
1995 Nissan 240 SX
Baton Rouge La
2-7-2006

 « Re: (XingYu)


I agree, searching is usually much easier...

I have been on the site for a while, in the KA forum. So, I do know that searching is usually easier (and faster) than asking something and waiting for answers. However, if you search for something, you usually get a crapload of different topics about what you searched for, and after looking at the first 10 or 15 and they all say "use the search!!!!" you get tired of looking.

Maybe someone should go through and clean stuff out?

I know its probably done anyway. I know I searched for something, and couldn't find anything on it. I searched three or four times before posting something, and sure enough...."try the search key."

WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Offline

16864 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « 


This will be stickied after circulation for awhile. I'm not adding it to the FAQ but making it its own Sticky.

WD

dekansnowman

Offline

130 posts
1989 240SX
Houston Tx
4-6-2006

 « Re: (WDRacing)


This is why I like Nico so much.....Thanks for the info. While I am not on a KAT project, its good to have tech and common sense info just laying around.
babowc
KDM-NESS



Offline

3100 posts
240sx
Lawrenceville/Suwanee GA
10-25-2004

 « 


key terms, so ppl can find it with searching feature:

ka-t, kat, boost, pressure, stock psi, boosted, ka24de, ka24e, compression #, compression, numbers, cylinders, coolant, WHP, HP, power, Internals, stock internals, spark plug, sparkplug, turbo, ignition.

Edub1
Forum Sage



Offline

1931 posts
89 240sx KA-T
Detroit MI
11-10-2005

 « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (WDRacing)


Excellent article!

Another question they typically ask is how much boost the KA can handle. I think this is a valid question for the following reason.

We all know that there is a difference between boost and horse power. This is normally attributed to larger turbos flowing more air. If we consider this dynamic, we will find that it is in the upper RPM range that the larger turbo's increased flow comes into play. More to the point, when the motor exceeds 5250RPMs and HP exceeds torque the bigger turbo is able to provide quality boost while the smaller one makes heat. I believe this is where the HP discrepancy comes from. In the lower RPM rages, where both turbos are efficiant, there should be no difference between the two.

Because the larger turbo will ultimatly make more HP at a lower boost, many with smaller turbos plan to run more boost to compensate. What this does, if my thinking is correct, is produce more low end strain on the engine parts and loses efficiancy (make heat rather than O2 mass) in the high RPM range. Obviously this is bad.

Suppose one's goal is 300HP. While a T04E 50 trim will make this at a cool, easy ~11lbs. A super 60 will require around 17lbs - and a good amount will be heat rather than mass.

From this, we see that running a larger turbo with less boost is prefferable to a smaller one with more boost. The mistake we often hear is that a given boost level from a larger turbo makes more power and is therefore more dangerous. For the reasons cited above, I think this is somewhat of a mistake. While the larger turbo will obviously make more HP at a given boost level, I'd have to say that the larger one with the greater HP is by it's nature, the safer of the two at any level of boost.

So, the logic would break down like this:


For a given HP, bigger @ 10lbs = smaller @ 15lbs - and safer.

For a given boost level, bigger @ 325HP = smaller @ 270HP - as safe.

So, I propose that the bigger turbo can make a given HP more safely than a smaller one, and more HP with equal safety than a smaller turbo at the same level of boost.

So, the answer to how much HP can my motor handle might sound something like " 325 - 350 with a T4 or 250 - 275 with a T3."



American soldiers don't sign up to die for their country, they sign up to make the other poor son of a ***** die for his. Hoorah!
Hughretro



Offline

73 posts
91 240sx and a 92 240sx(project car)
Trinity nc
4-2-2007

 « 


Good write up. On my project car I'm going all forged and fat cams, but I'm not even close to finishing her yet.




Project S13 KA24DET
http://www.myspace.com/hughretro
Alsontime

Offline

135 posts
1993 Nissan 240SX Convertible
Morganton NC
1-19-2007

 « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (Edub1)


I agree, I was using a GT28 on my KA-T around 15 psi and switched to a T04E at 15 psi and what a difference. You have to consider that both are running at 15 psi but the T04E can move a larger volume of air at 15 psi, increasing hp.




nissanfanatic

Offline

1314 posts
1992 Nissan 240sx SE
Gainesville Fl
11-1-2004

 « 


It all comes down to cylinder pressure. Just like a balloon or a soda bottle, the engine will break at a certain pressure level. Everything breaks under enough enough force. Pressure is force applied over area.



-Cory
Street racing fatalities: 0.21% of total fatalities in motor vehicle crashes.
FTC

1992 Nissan 240sx KA24DE-Turbo: The "Showcar"
Stock internals
532whp/486ft.lbs-30psi
12.6@122.3mph-22psi
http://ka-t.org/cory_b.php

sniperbill3

Offline

35 posts
1991 Nissan S13 240sx
Canton TX
5-11-2007

 « Re: (Florida240sx)


You show great appreciation in the KA24DE and thanks for all your turbo info on the KA and what it can handle i would like to keep my Ka instead of a swap for the sr20. Since the ka can get more power out of it than the sr20
kheff46

Offline

18 posts
98 OBS-T, 92 240sx
medina ohio
11-17-2004

 « Re: (sniperbill3)


Quote, originally posted by sniperbill3 »
You show great appreciation in the KA24DE and thanks for all your turbo info on the KA and what it can handle i would like to keep my Ka instead of a swap for the sr20. Since the ka can get more power out of it than the sr20

both engines are completely different. besides the fact they both handle boost well. one revs to the moon. one will torque your house off the foundation(it WOULD be cool) almost... they are just different not better than one another. they were made for different purposes from the factory by engineers.

the KA's got a hella strong bottom end(the crank journals are bigger than the RB's are). and that means only good things for us!

please don't read into things/assume things like that. it can/will make you feel silly.

--keith

WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Offline

16864 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « Re: (kheff46)


Quote, originally posted by kheff46 »

both engines are completely different. besides the fact they both handle boost well. one revs to the moon. one will torque your house off the foundation(it WOULD be cool) almost... they are just different not better than one another. they were made for different purposes from the factory by engineers.

the KA's got a hella strong bottom end(the crank journals are bigger than the RB's are). and that means only good things for us!

please don't read into things/assume things like that. it can/will make you feel silly.

--keith

Actually, his statement is pretty on par. In fact it's much more correct then your's. The SR doesn't "rev to the moon" especially in factory trim. The KA has been taken to 8500 rpm...so I fail to see the difference there. The torque curve isn't THAT big of a difference. The main thing is the KA already resides inside of the 240, so why swap in a smaller motor? Everything comes down personal preference.

The article is simply talking about the KA, so there's no real reason at all to compare it to the SR20, which in itself is a very well built motor.

WD

kheff46

Offline

18 posts
98 OBS-T, 92 240sx
medina ohio
11-17-2004

 « Re: (WDRacing)


i was quoting his statement of "KA being somehow better than SR". and thats false in a generic sense. both are good engines. just different for different reasons. i personally don't think a smaller mill is good either. revs can be helped by fixing the valvetrain and certain other limitations from stock. SR's rev more out of the factory. KA's have torque from factory. these are different applications from factory. this is all i stated.

--keith

bam 240sx



Offline

32 posts
95 240se
Erie Pa
10-7-2006

 « 


great info now i know what to ask


thanks

rbfastback

Offline

28 posts
91 rb20 240sx fastback
fort myers FL
8-20-2007

 « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (WDRacing)


could a ka with a t-25 keep with a stock rb20???
GTLegend

Offline

55 posts
1993 240sx (S13), 1986 corolla (AE86)
new brunswick nj
8-27-2007

 « 


i just had my KA24de rebuilt i was wondering what kind HP i would be looking at if i was running a t-25 at 8 psi, high flow cat, and a cat-back?? is there any kinds ballpark figure?
WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Offline

16864 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « Re: (GTLegend)


The average is 10 WHP for every one PSI of boost.
Driftnoob



Offline

32 posts
S13 240sx
Philadelphia PA
3-2-2007

 « 


WOW........the frist post.......outstanding!!!!!!
im sure theres goin to be more ka-t now!!!
ima be 1 of them
Thanks WD !!!!!!!!!!!!
Driftnoob



Offline

32 posts
S13 240sx
Philadelphia PA
3-2-2007

 « 


i think the t25 is too small for the ka, it may spool too fast, then the powerband is goin to be too low......just thinkin in my head.......correct me if wrong.
and is the ka able to handle a 14b turbo with stock injector's, i know u said ppl are pushin 300 to the wheels with stock everything but with a fresh like motor... sorry im really lazy "_"
neverlift
Mad Thrasher



Offline

3172 posts
PIGNOSE #19 turbo piggy
sunshinestate
4-24-2006

 « Re: (Driftnoob)


Quote, originally posted by Driftnoob »
i think the t25 is too small for the ka, it may spool too fast, then the powerband is goin to be too low......just thinkin in my head.......correct me if wrong.
and is the ka able to handle a 14b turbo with stock injector's, i know u said ppl are pushin 300 to the wheels with stock everything but with a fresh like motor... sorry im really lazy "_"

lol better get you hard hat on then... noone is pushing 300 on stock everything.

how many psi with a 14b isnt that comparable to the t25? anyways no more than 5psi and thats with a good *** romtune or an afc and btm cause you gonna have det on stock map....



PIGNOSE SQUAD MEMBER # 19

someone buy my wheels http://forums.nicoclub.com/zer...57581

----------------------------------
r.i.p. Dad I miss you
06/14/54~04/18/09
----------------------------------
r.i.p. Lee
09/01/89~09/28/06

nissanfanatic

Offline

1314 posts
1992 Nissan 240sx SE
Gainesville Fl
11-1-2004

 « 


Apparently the stock rods and pistons can hold 496whp/436wtq.
WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Offline

16864 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « Re: (nissanfanatic)


There are far more engine failures at that level then success stories though. At that level Ivan was bending connecting rods. So that's really not a good statement to make, some of the noobs don't realize the extent of trial and error involved. It is however correct. People have been busting the 300 mark for the last 6 years on stock internals. But this thread is about what the KA can be made to produce reliably. And by reliably I mean by quite a few people for a long duration of time.

How Long have you been daily driving at your power level now?

WD

nissanfanatic

Offline

1314 posts
1992 Nissan 240sx SE
Gainesville Fl
11-1-2004

 « 


Whenever I can afford to run race fuel. I try to fill up the tank at least bi-weekly and have some fun on race gas. I might go this weekend and have some fun.

I only post information, nothing further. I think, based on conclusive stories, that far too many failure stories are related to operator error. Should that data be deemed inaccurate?

I've been over 400whp since April of 2006.

WDRacing
Porn Crusader



Offline

16864 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002

 « 


Operator error definitly contributes to most of the problems for sure. I just like to err on the side of caution when telling others what "safe" limits will be.

I of course simply stop when I've maxed out my fuel system. But in my case I tossed a rod shortly there after. I was at 165,000 though and was still using the stock oil pump. I definitly think a spun a bearing and tossed the rod.

WD

nissanfanatic

Offline

1314 posts
1992 Nissan 240sx SE
Gainesville Fl
11-1-2004

 « 


I only post what I personally make or experience and how I experience.
Justin VanWinkle



Offline

205 posts
'91 240sx FB(Looking for LS1)--- '92 240sx FB--- '93 240sx FB(DD)--- '04 RX-8--- '03 SV650(Track)
Lexington KY
5-19-2006

 « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (Alsontime)


Quote, originally posted by Alsontime »
I agree, I was using a GT28 on my KA-T around 15 psi and switched to a T04E at 15 psi and what a difference. You have to consider that both are running at 15 psi but the T04E can move a larger volume of air at 15 psi, increasing hp.

This leads me to ask: Where is the Boost PSI measured? I always thought it was measured somewhere between the turbo and throttle body... If that's true, then 15psi is 15psi - Right??

I'm saying, you have a sealed tube. You keep this tube regulated at 15psi. Now you poke a hole in this tube, you start pumping in to the tube keep 15psi in there... At this point, you are pushing X amount of air to keep 15psi in this tube... If you were to push more air, you will be increasing beyond your 15psi.

In this case, the tube is your intake, your air input is your turbo, and the hole in the tube is the action of your engine intaking air...

I'll admit that I know next to nothing about a turbo, but I'm just questioning the logic of this... Please correct me if I'm wrong, or if I have missed the point completely....

Thanks guys!!
Justin



Shift_IneedAbiggerGarage
2projects2many



Offline

224 posts
'91 S13 SR20DET
Southeast DK
1-24-2006

 « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (Justin VanWinkle)


The answer to your question is this. pressure is pressure, but volume is volume. Take and air hose coming off of your air compressor, regulate your air line to 15psi and you'll have 15psi coming out of your air nozzle but with a 3/16" hole, it's not more that much air, now picture a 24" box fan (blowing 15 psi of air) attached to say a 6' piece of 24" diameter tube. Can you imagine the amount of air coming out the end of that tube? Both are blowing 15psi, but the volume difference is HUGE! and than compress that into a chamber and compress it even more.

Hope that helps.



-Chris


nissanfanatic

Offline

1314 posts
1992 Nissan 240sx SE
Gainesville Fl
11-1-2004

 « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (2projects2many)


I think you intended to say either

A) Density
or
B) Mass

You cannot measure air in volume, only the container in which the air is held. Air has no volume, it has mass, which is affected by density in a given volume container.

2projects2many



Offline

224 posts
'91 S13 SR20DET
Southeast DK
1-24-2006

 « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (nissanfanatic)


Quote, originally posted by nissanfanatic »
I think you intended to say either

A) Density
or
B) Mass

You cannot measure air in volume, only the container in which the air is held. Air has no volume, it has mass, which is affected by density in a given volume container.

Yeah Cory- that's exactly what I meant-but I was referencing the volume as in CFM cubic feet per minute. volume is also relevant to mass and density. see below.


"The volume of an object is equal to its mass divided by its average density. This is a rearrangement of the calculation of density as mass per unit volume.

The term specific volume is used for volume divided by mass. This is the reciprocal of the mass density, expressed in units such as cubic meters per kilogram (m³·kg-1)."

Justin VanWinkle



Offline

205 posts
'91 240sx FB(Looking for LS1)--- '92 240sx FB--- '93 240sx FB(DD)--- '04 RX-8--- '03 SV650(Track)
Lexington KY
5-19-2006

 « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (2projects2many)


Yes, I understand that... but I still am unable to see the difference here.

You just made the volume of air more at your intake, but the pressure is still the same; Therefor, you still only have 15psi at the intake of your head, and you can only squeeze so much through there.

In other words, you are increasing the size of your compressor; However, the space filled by the air from your compressor to your cylinder is still the exact same. So your volume is the exact same.

The reason I say this is because with the box fan theory you gave me, you are changing the size of the output holes. So now you would have to have a larger volume to be able to regulate at 15psi....

Make sense?

2projects2many



Offline

224 posts
'91 S13 SR20DET
Southeast DK
1-24-2006

 « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (Justin VanWinkle)


Quote, originally posted by Justin VanWinkle »
Yes, I understand that... but I still am unable to see the difference here.

You just made the volume of air more at your intake, but the pressure is still the same; Therefor, you still only have 15psi at the intake of your head, and you can only squeeze so much through there.

In other words, you are increasing the size of your compressor; However, the space filled by the air from your compressor to your cylinder is still the exact same. So your volume is the exact same.

The reason I say this is because with the box fan theory you gave me, you are changing the size of the output holes. So now you would have to have a larger volume to be able to regulate at 15psi....

Make sense?


I think I understand what you are saying, all I know is it happens. Yes two turbos of different size blowing 15 psi may be equal, however the larger turbo is working less to match the smaller turbo which is maxing it's output, thus the larger one has plenty of forced air on tap when needed, where the smaller will leave the engine wanting more. In retrospect I see how you'd say it's the same, pretty much the only reason to buy a larger turbo is to push more boost, not to hold it back. To some the smaller may be suitable, but it's an addiction, and from many people's advice, it's better to go a little bigger in the beginning so you have some "growing" room in the future. I'm no scientist, I wish I knew how to explain it better and plainer- but it just makes sense to me.

NissanPride247



Offline

136 posts
1989 240sx
Quincy CA
11-27-2007

 « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (WDRacing)


Wow truly great article! Very good overview. I'll think about keeing the K instead of the SR.



SHIFT_Passion
1989 240sx (9lives) Now try it in SR!!


addisonblck



Offline

696 posts
91 se 92 base model
back in la.....yes la
12-4-2007

 « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (NissanPride247)


to all of the above...... dis sh@# helps out alot.
ive ben lookin round n round for these q's & a's n aint found nuttin.
butu this is sum good stuff.



i got censored
AH240sx



Offline

50 posts

10-21-2007

 « 


Lol..if I hadn't read this first. I think I would have bought forged internals when my goals for right now are only 7psi on the KA
 First  1 2 3 4 >  Last

» Return to KA24ET / KA24DET Forum
Forum Jump
Quick Reply

Powered by ZeroForum 2.4.0. ©2008 RelyNet, Inc.



< Contact Us - NICO >

Visit G37Driver.com for Infiniti G37 Information
NICOclub's Nissan forums and Infiniti forums and all affiliated sites are the property of HDS Holdings, Inc. They are independent publications and are not affiliated with or endorsed by Nissan Motor Company or Nissan North America.

Information © Copyright © 2000-2009 by NICOclub
All rights reserved. Material may not be copied or reprinted without written permission.
Visit 370zclub.org for Nissan 370z Information

Google
Web NICOclub.com

Nissan Sport Magazine Forums
Nissan Infiniti Events and Shows Nissan Infiniti Road Tests and Reviews
Nissan Infiniti Related Articles Nissan Infiniti Technical Information Articles
Nissan Financing Advice Nissan Infiniti News Archive
240sx performance modification articles and information Nissan performance and modification
Infiniti performance and modification Nissan Infiniti Car Owners Homepage
Nissan Infiniti Parts Marketplace


Nissan Infiniti Links


Do NOT copy content, plagiarism will be detected by Copyscape.

The web's most active Nissan forum !

Home Photography Camera Information and Help

Racing maps and locations