capwred
Offline
595 posts
attalla al
7-28-2005
|
One of the best write ups i have seen. Thanks

 ca18det powered 240sx http://www.alabamagz.com
|
Florida240sx
Moderator

Offline
11575 posts
93 Hatch 5spd 93 vert 89 hatch
DeLand FL
7-1-2004
|
Good write-up. Really needed since all the "new" people lately.... some of them were a bit cocky....
http://www.itsfunnyhoney.com/v..._time S14 for sale http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread?id=294220
 Megan Racing Parts supplier.Among many more companies Act, hks, b&m, sparco,msd,etc. hotrod6000000@yahoo.com KA-T why settle for anything less?
|
eazye2000
Booze Hound

Offline
1637 posts
of FAIL...
Hanscom AFB MA
6-27-2005
|
| « Re: (Florida240sx) | 8:22 PM 2/6/2007 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by Florida240sx » | | Really needed since all the "new" people.... some of them were a bit cocky.... |
Man, why you guys have to call me out like that?! Just kidding. Glad to see someone posted something like this. *edit* Sorry, had to fix it.. I couldn't make fun of WD like that.....'lord I apologize....' Don't wanna piss him off, he don't talk to me on AIM anymore.. LoL
Modified by eazye2000 at 8:40 PM 2/6/2007

|
babowc
KDM-NESS

Offline
3090 posts
240sx
Lawrenceville/Suwanee GA
10-25-2004
|
sounds good. the thing is however.. none of the noobs search... haha, i hope you guys sticky this in bright pink flashing letters, so newbs will actually NOTICE this.. instead of cluttering the ka-t sub-forum.
Install Z33 seats into your S-Car! http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread?id=243537
|
XingYu

Offline
349 posts
1993 Nissan 240SX
2-1-2005
|
Great write up! +1 for the sticky~
 R.I.P 1989 Nissan 240SX SE 3.6.04 - 7.12.05 Sold R.I.P 1993 Nissan 240SX SE 7.31.05 - 12.11.05 STOLEN! NEW 1993 Nissan 240SX Base 1.10.06
|
NateDogg
Online
779 posts
8-24-2002
|
Yes just make the title "OMG 1000WHP KA-T STOCK BLOCK!"Also, dont forget those poor SOHC engines dont have the same compression as DOHC engines. So when doing a compression test, maybe you should put a lower number for them. IMO compression should be above 165+-10psi for DOHC.
|
zanilth
Offline
164 posts
1995 Nissan 240 SX
Baton Rouge La
2-7-2006
|
| « Re: (XingYu) | 9:44 PM 2/6/2007 |
|
I agree, searching is usually much easier...I have been on the site for a while, in the KA forum. So, I do know that searching is usually easier (and faster) than asking something and waiting for answers. However, if you search for something, you usually get a crapload of different topics about what you searched for, and after looking at the first 10 or 15 and they all say "use the search!!!!" you get tired of looking. Maybe someone should go through and clean stuff out? I know its probably done anyway. I know I searched for something, and couldn't find anything on it. I searched three or four times before posting something, and sure enough...."try the search key."
|
WDRacing
Super Grumpy Moderator

Offline
14666 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002
|
This will be stickied after circulation for awhile. I'm not adding it to the FAQ but making it its own Sticky.WD
|
dekansnowman
Offline
109 posts
1989 240SX
Houston Tx
4-6-2006
|
| « Re: (WDRacing) | 12:01 AM 2/7/2007 |
|
This is why I like Nico so much.....Thanks for the info. While I am not on a KAT project, its good to have tech and common sense info just laying around.
|
babowc
KDM-NESS

Offline
3090 posts
240sx
Lawrenceville/Suwanee GA
10-25-2004
|
key terms, so ppl can find it with searching feature:ka-t, kat, boost, pressure, stock psi, boosted, ka24de, ka24e, compression #, compression, numbers, cylinders, coolant, WHP, HP, power, Internals, stock internals, spark plug, sparkplug, turbo, ignition.
|
Edub1
Forum Sage

Offline
1894 posts
89 240sx KA-T
Detroit MI
11-10-2005
|
| « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (WDRacing) | 8:27 AM 2/10/2007 |
|
Excellent article!Another question they typically ask is how much boost the KA can handle. I think this is a valid question for the following reason. We all know that there is a difference between boost and horse power. This is normally attributed to larger turbos flowing more air. If we consider this dynamic, we will find that it is in the upper RPM range that the larger turbo's increased flow comes into play. More to the point, when the motor exceeds 5250RPMs and HP exceeds torque the bigger turbo is able to provide quality boost while the smaller one makes heat. I believe this is where the HP discrepancy comes from. In the lower RPM rages, where both turbos are efficiant, there should be no difference between the two. Because the larger turbo will ultimatly make more HP at a lower boost, many with smaller turbos plan to run more boost to compensate. What this does, if my thinking is correct, is produce more low end strain on the engine parts and loses efficiancy (make heat rather than O2 mass) in the high RPM range. Obviously this is bad. Suppose one's goal is 300HP. While a T04E 50 trim will make this at a cool, easy ~11lbs. A super 60 will require around 17lbs - and a good amount will be heat rather than mass. From this, we see that running a larger turbo with less boost is prefferable to a smaller one with more boost. The mistake we often hear is that a given boost level from a larger turbo makes more power and is therefore more dangerous. For the reasons cited above, I think this is somewhat of a mistake. While the larger turbo will obviously make more HP at a given boost level, I'd have to say that the larger one with the greater HP is by it's nature, the safer of the two at any level of boost. So, the logic would break down like this: For a given HP, bigger @ 10lbs = smaller @ 15lbs - and safer.
For a given boost level, bigger @ 325HP = smaller @ 270HP - as safe. So, I propose that the bigger turbo can make a given HP more safely than a smaller one, and more HP with equal safety than a smaller turbo at the same level of boost. So, the answer to how much HP can my motor handle might sound something like " 325 - 350 with a T4 or 250 - 275 with a T3."
American soldiers don't sign up to die for their country, they sign up to make the other poor son of a ***** die for his. Hoorah!
|
Hughretro

Offline
73 posts
91 240sx and a 92 240sx(project car)
Trinity nc
4-2-2007
|
Good write up. On my project car I'm going all forged and fat cams, but I'm not even close to finishing her yet.
 Project S13 KA24DET http://www.myspace.com/hughretro
|
Alsontime
Offline
81 posts
1993 Nissan 240SX Convertible
Morganton NC
1-19-2007
|
| « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (Edub1) | 9:09 PM 4/14/2007 |
|
I agree, I was using a GT28 on my KA-T around 15 psi and switched to a T04E at 15 psi and what a difference. You have to consider that both are running at 15 psi but the T04E can move a larger volume of air at 15 psi, increasing hp.

|
nissanfanatic
Offline
1314 posts
1992 Nissan 240sx SE
Gainesville Fl
11-1-2004
|
It all comes down to cylinder pressure. Just like a balloon or a soda bottle, the engine will break at a certain pressure level. Everything breaks under enough enough force. Pressure is force applied over area.
-Cory Street racing fatalities: 0.21% of total fatalities in motor vehicle crashes. FTC1992 Nissan 240sx KA24DE-Turbo: The "Showcar" Stock internals 532whp/486ft.lbs-30psi 12.6@122.3mph-22psi http://ka-t.org/cory_b.php
|
sniperbill3
Offline
20 posts
1991 Nissan S13 240sx
Canton TX
5-11-2007
|
| « Re: (Florida240sx) | 12:47 PM 5/11/2007 |
|
You show great appreciation in the KA24DE and thanks for all your turbo info on the KA and what it can handle i would like to keep my Ka instead of a swap for the sr20. Since the ka can get more power out of it than the sr20
|
kheff46
Offline
18 posts
98 OBS-T, 92 240sx
medina ohio
11-17-2004
|
| « Re: (sniperbill3) | 9:00 AM 7/8/2007 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by sniperbill3 » | | You show great appreciation in the KA24DE and thanks for all your turbo info on the KA and what it can handle i would like to keep my Ka instead of a swap for the sr20. Since the ka can get more power out of it than the sr20 |
both engines are completely different. besides the fact they both handle boost well. one revs to the moon. one will torque your house off the foundation(it WOULD be cool) almost... they are just different not better than one another. they were made for different purposes from the factory by engineers. the KA's got a hella strong bottom end(the crank journals are bigger than the RB's are). and that means only good things for us! please don't read into things/assume things like that. it can/will make you feel silly. --keith
|
WDRacing
Super Grumpy Moderator

Offline
14666 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002
|
| « Re: (kheff46) | 10:52 AM 7/8/2007 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by kheff46 » | both engines are completely different. besides the fact they both handle boost well. one revs to the moon. one will torque your house off the foundation(it WOULD be cool) almost... they are just different not better than one another. they were made for different purposes from the factory by engineers. the KA's got a hella strong bottom end(the crank journals are bigger than the RB's are). and that means only good things for us! please don't read into things/assume things like that. it can/will make you feel silly. --keith |
Actually, his statement is pretty on par. In fact it's much more correct then your's. The SR doesn't "rev to the moon" especially in factory trim. The KA has been taken to 8500 rpm...so I fail to see the difference there. The torque curve isn't THAT big of a difference. The main thing is the KA already resides inside of the 240, so why swap in a smaller motor? Everything comes down personal preference. The article is simply talking about the KA, so there's no real reason at all to compare it to the SR20, which in itself is a very well built motor. WD
|
kheff46
Offline
18 posts
98 OBS-T, 92 240sx
medina ohio
11-17-2004
|
| « Re: (WDRacing) | 7:01 AM 7/12/2007 |
|
i was quoting his statement of "KA being somehow better than SR". and thats false in a generic sense. both are good engines. just different for different reasons. i personally don't think a smaller mill is good either. revs can be helped by fixing the valvetrain and certain other limitations from stock. SR's rev more out of the factory. KA's have torque from factory. these are different applications from factory. this is all i stated.--keith
|
bam 240sx

Offline
32 posts
95 240se
Erie Pa
10-7-2006
|
great info now i know what to ask thanks
|
rbfastback
Offline
26 posts
91 rb20 240sx fastback
fort myers FL
8-20-2007
|
| « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (WDRacing) | 1:58 PM 8/20/2007 |
|
could a ka with a t-25 keep with a stock rb20???
|
GTLegend
Offline
22 posts
1993 240sx (S13), 1986 corolla (AE86)
new brunswick nj
8-27-2007
|
i just had my KA24de rebuilt i was wondering what kind HP i would be looking at if i was running a t-25 at 8 psi, high flow cat, and a cat-back?? is there any kinds ballpark figure?
|
WDRacing
Super Grumpy Moderator

Offline
14666 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002
|
| « Re: (GTLegend) | 3:59 PM 8/27/2007 |
|
The average is 10 WHP for every one PSI of boost.
|
Driftnoob

Offline
32 posts
S13 240sx
Philadelphia PA
3-2-2007
|
WOW........the frist post.......outstanding!!!!!! im sure theres goin to be more ka-t now!!! ima be 1 of them Thanks WD !!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Driftnoob

Offline
32 posts
S13 240sx
Philadelphia PA
3-2-2007
|
i think the t25 is too small for the ka, it may spool too fast, then the powerband is goin to be too low......just thinkin in my head.......correct me if wrong. and is the ka able to handle a 14b turbo with stock injector's, i know u said ppl are pushin 300 to the wheels with stock everything but with a fresh like motor... sorry im really lazy "_"
|
neverlift
brain fart

Offline
2752 posts
PIGNOSE #19 turbo piggy
sunshinestate
4-24-2006
|
| « Re: (Driftnoob) | 5:36 PM 9/22/2007 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by Driftnoob » | i think the t25 is too small for the ka, it may spool too fast, then the powerband is goin to be too low......just thinkin in my head.......correct me if wrong. and is the ka able to handle a 14b turbo with stock injector's, i know u said ppl are pushin 300 to the wheels with stock everything but with a fresh like motor... sorry im really lazy "_" |
lol better get you hard hat on then... noone is pushing 300 on stock everything. how many psi with a 14b isnt that comparable to the t25? anyways no more than 5psi and thats with a good *** romtune or an afc and btm cause you gonna have det on stock map....
PIGNOSE SQUAD MEMBER # 19
 ---------------------------------- r.i.p. Lee 09/01/89~09/28/06
|
nissanfanatic
Offline
1314 posts
1992 Nissan 240sx SE
Gainesville Fl
11-1-2004
|
Apparently the stock rods and pistons can hold 496whp/436wtq.
|
WDRacing
Super Grumpy Moderator

Offline
14666 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002
|
| « Re: (nissanfanatic) | 7:35 PM 10/10/2007 |
|
There are far more engine failures at that level then success stories though. At that level Ivan was bending connecting rods. So that's really not a good statement to make, some of the noobs don't realize the extent of trial and error involved. It is however correct. People have been busting the 300 mark for the last 6 years on stock internals. But this thread is about what the KA can be made to produce reliably. And by reliably I mean by quite a few people for a long duration of time.How Long have you been daily driving at your power level now? WD
|
nissanfanatic
Offline
1314 posts
1992 Nissan 240sx SE
Gainesville Fl
11-1-2004
|
Whenever I can afford to run race fuel. I try to fill up the tank at least bi-weekly and have some fun on race gas. I might go this weekend and have some fun.I only post information, nothing further. I think, based on conclusive stories, that far too many failure stories are related to operator error. Should that data be deemed inaccurate? I've been over 400whp since April of 2006.
|
WDRacing
Super Grumpy Moderator

Offline
14666 posts
1995 240SX, K5 Blazer
USA
11-25-2002
|
Operator error definitly contributes to most of the problems for sure. I just like to err on the side of caution when telling others what "safe" limits will be.I of course simply stop when I've maxed out my fuel system. But in my case I tossed a rod shortly there after. I was at 165,000 though and was still using the stock oil pump. I definitly think a spun a bearing and tossed the rod. WD
|
nissanfanatic
Offline
1314 posts
1992 Nissan 240sx SE
Gainesville Fl
11-1-2004
|
I only post what I personally make or experience and how I experience.
|
Justin VanWinkle

Offline
204 posts
'91 240sx FB(Looking for LS1)--- '92 240sx FB--- '93 240sx FB(DD)--- '04 RX-8--- '03 SV650(Track)
Lexington KY
5-19-2006
|
| « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (Alsontime) | 5:08 AM 10/23/2007 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by Alsontime » | | I agree, I was using a GT28 on my KA-T around 15 psi and switched to a T04E at 15 psi and what a difference. You have to consider that both are running at 15 psi but the T04E can move a larger volume of air at 15 psi, increasing hp. |
This leads me to ask: Where is the Boost PSI measured? I always thought it was measured somewhere between the turbo and throttle body... If that's true, then 15psi is 15psi - Right?? I'm saying, you have a sealed tube. You keep this tube regulated at 15psi. Now you poke a hole in this tube, you start pumping in to the tube keep 15psi in there... At this point, you are pushing X amount of air to keep 15psi in this tube... If you were to push more air, you will be increasing beyond your 15psi. In this case, the tube is your intake, your air input is your turbo, and the hole in the tube is the action of your engine intaking air... I'll admit that I know next to nothing about a turbo, but I'm just questioning the logic of this... Please correct me if I'm wrong, or if I have missed the point completely.... Thanks guys!! Justin
Shift_IneedAbiggerGarage
|
2projects2many

Offline
151 posts
'91 S13 KA24DET
Southeast DK
1-24-2006
|
| « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (Justin VanWinkle) | 4:07 PM 10/23/2007 |
|
The answer to your question is this. pressure is pressure, but volume is volume. Take and air hose coming off of your air compressor, regulate your air line to 15psi and you'll have 15psi coming out of your air nozzle but with a 3/16" hole, it's not more that much air, now picture a 24" box fan (blowing 15 psi of air) attached to say a 6' piece of 24" diameter tube. Can you imagine the amount of air coming out the end of that tube? Both are blowing 15psi, but the volume difference is HUGE! and than compress that into a chamber and compress it even more. Hope that helps.
-Chris 
|
nissanfanatic
Offline
1314 posts
1992 Nissan 240sx SE
Gainesville Fl
11-1-2004
|
| « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (2projects2many) | 11:01 PM 10/23/2007 |
|
I think you intended to say eitherA) Density or B) Mass You cannot measure air in volume, only the container in which the air is held. Air has no volume, it has mass, which is affected by density in a given volume container.
|
2projects2many

Offline
151 posts
'91 S13 KA24DET
Southeast DK
1-24-2006
|
| « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (nissanfanatic) | 1:27 AM 10/24/2007 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by nissanfanatic » | | I think you intended to say either A) Density or B) Mass You cannot measure air in volume, only the container in which the air is held. Air has no volume, it has mass, which is affected by density in a given volume container. |
Yeah Cory- that's exactly what I meant-but I was referencing the volume as in CFM cubic feet per minute. volume is also relevant to mass and density. see below. "The volume of an object is equal to its mass divided by its average density. This is a rearrangement of the calculation of density as mass per unit volume.
The term specific volume is used for volume divided by mass. This is the reciprocal of the mass density, expressed in units such as cubic meters per kilogram (m³·kg-1)."
|
Justin VanWinkle

Offline
204 posts
'91 240sx FB(Looking for LS1)--- '92 240sx FB--- '93 240sx FB(DD)--- '04 RX-8--- '03 SV650(Track)
Lexington KY
5-19-2006
|
| « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (2projects2many) | 5:38 AM 10/24/2007 |
|
Yes, I understand that... but I still am unable to see the difference here.You just made the volume of air more at your intake, but the pressure is still the same; Therefor, you still only have 15psi at the intake of your head, and you can only squeeze so much through there. In other words, you are increasing the size of your compressor; However, the space filled by the air from your compressor to your cylinder is still the exact same. So your volume is the exact same. The reason I say this is because with the box fan theory you gave me, you are changing the size of the output holes. So now you would have to have a larger volume to be able to regulate at 15psi.... Make sense?
|
2projects2many

Offline
151 posts
'91 S13 KA24DET
Southeast DK
1-24-2006
|
| « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (Justin VanWinkle) | 6:36 PM 10/24/2007 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by Justin VanWinkle » | | Yes, I understand that... but I still am unable to see the difference here. You just made the volume of air more at your intake, but the pressure is still the same; Therefor, you still only have 15psi at the intake of your head, and you can only squeeze so much through there. In other words, you are increasing the size of your compressor; However, the space filled by the air from your compressor to your cylinder is still the exact same. So your volume is the exact same. The reason I say this is because with the box fan theory you gave me, you are changing the size of the output holes. So now you would have to have a larger volume to be able to regulate at 15psi.... Make sense? |
I think I understand what you are saying, all I know is it happens. Yes two turbos of different size blowing 15 psi may be equal, however the larger turbo is working less to match the smaller turbo which is maxing it's output, thus the larger one has plenty of forced air on tap when needed, where the smaller will leave the engine wanting more. In retrospect I see how you'd say it's the same, pretty much the only reason to buy a larger turbo is to push more boost, not to hold it back. To some the smaller may be suitable, but it's an addiction, and from many people's advice, it's better to go a little bigger in the beginning so you have some "growing" room in the future. I'm no scientist, I wish I knew how to explain it better and plainer- but it just makes sense to me.
|
NissanPride247

Offline
114 posts
1989 240sx
Quincy CA
11-27-2007
|
| « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (WDRacing) | 11:54 AM 12/9/2007 |
|
Wow truly great article! Very good overview. I'll think about keeing the K instead of the SR.
SHIFT_Passion 1989 240sx (9lives) Now try it in SR!!
|
addisonblck

Offline
445 posts
91 se
back in la.....yes la
12-4-2007
|
| « Re: What Can My KAT Handle In Stock Form (NissanPride247) | 9:49 AM 12/13/2007 |
|
to all of the above...... dis sh@# helps out alot. ive ben lookin round n round for these q's & a's n aint found nuttin. butu this is sum good stuff.
http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread?id=359965 i have ka24de **** for sale plus sum turbo stuff
|
AH240sx

Offline
50 posts
10-21-2007
|
Lol..if I hadn't read this first. I think I would have bought forged internals when my goals for right now are only 7psi on the KA
|
| First 1 2 3 > Last |