I don't know about a Titan, but I know a guy in Indy that could probably get you into a new Escalade on 22's. I hear he does SPECIAL financerepo man wrote:I have a 450 beacon score, am 10k flipped in my trade, my chapter 7 isn't quite discharged yet and I make 19k per year.
Can you get me done on a new Titan with 22's?
It's something that's really good to know up front. Reason being, if you have reverse equity in your trade, it would be nice to be able to help you get into a vehicle that can help eliminate some of that reverse equity. I'll use part of what Andy said earlier in this thread as an example:audtatious wrote:Why do dealers want to know before hand if you have a trade-in? Why do they always low-ball the hell out of trade-in's?
In this situation I'm first doing an interview with the customer. What are they looking for? What is their motivation? What features matter? What colors do they like? How do they plan to pay for this vehicle? How soon are they going to make this decision? If by this point they haven't told me they're trading something in, then I'll look at their vehicle outside and say "Oh, I see you drove up in a Blazer, you must be adding another vehicle to the fleet huh?".repo man wrote:I have a 450 beacon score, am 10k flipped in my trade, my chapter 7 isn't quite discharged yet and I make 19k per year.
Can you get me done on a new Titan with 22's?
Now here in west texas we have a huge issue with this people will look up values of their trades with Kelly Blue Book or NADA or whatever but what they don't realize is out here in the desert of texas our market is controlled by the wholesellers. Which means to you the consumer that our values on trades are what that vehicle is selling for in our area at that time. It is not a fun objection to deal with....gniknave wrote:As far as low balling, they don't necessarily do that. Most consumers use Edmunds or Kelly Blue Book to access their trade in value, and expect to get exaclty that. Most don't consider the cost of the dealer doing a safety inspection, then having to fix anything they might find wrong, then having to make sure there's enough of a profit margin left for the dealership AND the salesperson to make something by selling it. Also, dealers like us actually call an auctioner and find out exactly what the vehicle goes for (on average) at wholesale auctions. We do the market value.
Way too much, but it is appreciated.gniknave wrote:
It's something that's really good to know up front. Reason being, if you have reverse equity in your trade, it would be nice to be able to help you get into a vehicle that can help eliminate some of that reverse equity. I'll use part of what Andy said earlier in this thread as an example:
Modified by gniknave at 5:54 PM 12/1/2006
My main motivation (not speaking for ALL salespeople) in asking about a trade-in, is to overcome all potential reverse equity issues by pointing them to the right car or the right situation. You may think the worst thing some people can do is trade out of a car with reverse equity, but you'd probably be surprised that 65% of the people I deal with are in a reverse equity situation... and I don't do business int he ghetto either.audtatious wrote:In my situation, there is no reverse equity issue. If a salesman asks about a trade-in, they immediately stop negotiations to have the car checked out and it gives them some "pull" because the customer is there with "car in hand". IMO, a person who walks in the door with no trade-in and "cash in hand" or pre-approved financing can get a better deal on the actual car value. Once some initial numbers have been discussed and are agreeable, THEN you flip the trade-in in the picture. If the dealership comes back with different figures, you simply walk out the door.
What is the difference? With a trade-in sale, the saleman and dealership have more control over the vehicle price and they know the customer is ready to "deal" in order to drive out in a new car. My way, the customer will be the driving factor to get the dealership to offer the car at an agreed upon price before bringing up the trade. At that point, the customer is still controling the purchase.
My deal is that people need to get a grip on their financing and not do something so stupid. Can't afford a new one? Buy a 1-year old with low miles and avoid the whole issue completely. Don't take this as bashing you or all dealerships either (not my intent at all). As we all well know, want > need is the norm today. No wonder so many people are in financial issues.gniknave wrote:
My main motivation (not speaking for ALL salespeople) in asking about a trade-in, is to overcome all potential reverse equity issues by pointing them to the right car or the right situation. You may think the worst thing some people can do is trade out of a car with reverse equity, but you'd probably be surprised that 65% of the people I deal with are in a reverse equity situation... and I don't do business int he ghetto either.
Of course, if they were never backword in the first place it would not be a issue. I had two kids and drove a Celica coupe because that is what I had and I could not afford another car at the time. I dealt with it just fine. I can't say I am perfect either as my X-wife traded in a '96 Sentra on a '98 Quest and we went into the reverse equity issue. Of course, the assumption was to keep the vehicle for 3-5 years. Two years later she talked me into an upgrade to a '00 Villager Estate and we were in a double-reverse equity issue that the dealer/salesman pressed. I should have simply told her no. 5 years later, she still has that vehicle tho.gniknave wrote:There are some situations where maybe a couple has a 2-door, and suddenly are expecting a child and need to get something with more size. A lot of times, leasing is an excellent way to get out of reverse equity and still have a good affordable payment. On our '06 Beetle convertibles, we had $3000 cash back on those, allowing that to be a car we could easily get someone into if they had some reverse equity. On that car, if someone had $3500 in reverse equity, we could actually put $3000 of it into the Beetle, and then discount the car $500 and it would look like they paid just below MSRP for the car. Situations like that are why I like to know about a trade in advance.
Not all dealerships are alike. About 60% of the ones I have dealt with will play with the numbers of the trade-in vs. car price to increase their profit margin which results in me eventually paying more for the car. Yes, I fully expect the dealership to make a profit. I have just noticed that I have more pull when I have hammered out a price then work the trade-in afterward. IMO, it is pretty simple if the vehicle is not in a reverse-equity situation. Trade-in value - remainder owed = reduction in car price. The dealer can then resale the car at a profit as well after doing a simple detail and cleanup.gniknave wrote:Now, on the rare occasion I get someone like yourself Matt, that have no reverse equity, I'm perfectly fine with you negotiating the price, then bringing up your trade. While I'd still rather know these things ahead of time to make for a much quicker and smoother transaction, if you'd prefer to go the "wait it out" route, then so be it. I said before, some dealerships do things differently, but regardless of whether you're in a reverse equity situation or not, our trade-in appraisals still work the same.
Welcome to NICO gldman!gldman wrote:Help with used car purchase? I wish to purchase a used car that is safe, has an engine that is wimpy, can take a few nicks, and will be low in maintenance costs. This will be my son's first auto. I have no experience purchasing a used car. I think a new car for a new driver would be a mistake. Can any of the salesman point me in the right direction.
Thanks in advance for your help.
I'm not sure about VCI leases, but I do know that some will put restrictions on the age of drivers.gldman wrote:Thanks. I checked the articles and prices on Carsdirect. Just for example, a 2005 Jetta is $15,995 and a new 2007 is $18,126. I checked the Volkswagen because they have the best CPO program according to intellichoice. For that minimal difference maybe I should lease a new Jetta or similar?Are there lease restrictions that would not allow a 17 year old to drive the car? Extra reason for the lease is if the car is in an accident like those tv ads, I am only out my deductible and do not suffer a value reduction on the car as well. Hopefully my son would also walk away just like the kids on the Volkswagen ads. Your thoughts about lease new vs buy used would be appreciated as well.
Get him a lightly used Corolla or Civic. With a new driver a lease is not a good idea.gldman wrote:Thanks, This is my situation. My wife and I want my son to have a car so we will not have drive him to and fro and so he will not need borrow our cars. Round trip to school is 5 miles and other places he will go will not be a long distance. I want a very safe auto with a low horse power engine like the Toyota Corolla I4 126hp to discourage speed. I expect he will bang up the car, Isn't that what all new drivers do? Money(what I can afford) is not an issue, but I wish to be sensible. What would you do in my shoes. Thanks.
I'm going to answer the Volkswagen part since I sell them too. I have plenty of people that lease brand new Jetta's for a first time driver. Now, I haven't had the question about lease restrictions for 17 year olds come up before, so at the moment I can't answer that. However I can tell you that you're right about VW CPO cars. They do have the best CPO program out there, and they're also one of, if not the safest car on the road. The only thing is even though there isn't a huge performance aftermarket for them, they actually have a decent amount of power out of the 2.5L 5-cylinder. If you want to prevent racing or aggressive driving, you might want to look at an alternative.gldman wrote:Thanks. I checked the articles and prices on Carsdirect. Just for example, a 2005 Jetta is $15,995 and a new 2007 is $18,126. I checked the Volkswagen because they have the best CPO program according to intellichoice. For that minimal difference maybe I should lease a new Jetta or similar?Are there lease restrictions that would not allow a 17 year old to drive the car? Extra reason for the lease is if the car is in an accident like those tv ads, I am only out my deductible and do not suffer a value reduction on the car as well. Hopefully my son would also walk away just like the kids on the Volkswagen ads. Your thoughts about lease new vs buy used would be appreciated as well.
^ditto^MattB wrote:Assuming that whoever you lease from will let someone that young drive a leased car, young drivers often beat on their cars, which leads to excessive wear and tear, which will lead to a lot of charges at the end of the lease.
And with those new car prices and lease deals you see, be sure to read the fine print. Lease deals are often low-mileage leases wtih a fair amount of money down. The prices on new cars may be on so-called "ad cars" where they sell one or two stripped down cars at that price but don't have a lot of them.
I think not having tech or journey will make a difference. When I get to work tomorrow I'll find out and post a sure answer.DooReedo wrote:Where can you find you iPod cable? I have been looking for a while and cant find one. Also I did not get the technology package or journey package. Will that make a difference?(I have a M35)
No problem, I'm glad to be able to help out.gniknave wrote:Matt, thanks for your help here. I've been tied up all weekend. Good to see this forum FINALLY getting some proper use!
I'm going to answer the Volkswagen part since I sell them too. I have plenty of people that lease brand new Jetta's for a first time driver. Now, I haven't had the question about lease restrictions for 17 year olds come up before, so at the moment I can't answer that. However I can tell you that you're right about VW CPO cars. They do have the best CPO program out there, and they're also one of, if not the safest car on the road. The only thing is even though there isn't a huge performance aftermarket for them, they actually have a decent amount of power out of the 2.5L 5-cylinder. If you want to prevent racing or aggressive driving, you might want to look at an alternative.
This is true. Also consider a VW Rabbit. They use the same engine as the Jetta, but enter at a lower price point. However they tend to not lease as well due to their low production - good selling numbers.MattB wrote:
No problem, I'm glad to be able to help out.
One thing to consider power-wise when looking at a VW is that the pre-05.5 (Mk4) Jettas have significantly less power from the base engine...the 2.0 I4 makes only 115hp IIRC vs. 150hp on the current Mk5 models.
A word of advice though: don't buy an underpowered car. You don't want to give your kid something with so much power that he will get into trouble but you don't want something so slow that he'll get hit just trying to move out into traffic.
Another thing to consider is that stripped down models of any car may not lease out as well as better-equipped models that retain more value and are more popular.gniknave wrote:
This is true. Also consider a VW Rabbit. They use the same engine as the Jetta, but enter at a lower price point. However they tend to not lease as well due to their low production - good selling numbers.
VW requires anybody on a Lease contract to be 18 or older.gldman wrote:Thanks, I would like to know if Volkswagen puts any restrictions on the age of a driver for their leasing program. I appreciate the help.