Car is stock. One day the speedo worked, the next day it didnt. Also, is there any change that I could make that would cause the speedometer to register 70mph while at a stop light?Goldeneagle wrote:Umm...what is the big deal? When an individual makes changes to a vehicle the speedometer does tend to read wrong.
This is a foolish statement. When was the last time you calibrated your TV? Rebuilt your microwave? Yes, electronics fail (as mine did) but they cannot be recalibrated for age related wear.Goldeneagle wrote:On top of that older electronics some times need to be recalibrated to be more accurate.
Again, if you read what I posted above, you'd see that when I put the SOHC speedo in it read perfectly. In my original thread, I mentioned that the odometer is not affected, so I ruled out the vss.Goldeneagle wrote:When was the last time you had the vehicle speed sensor replaced?
http://www.zeroyon.com/index/content/view/20/47 Thats how it works. However, thats not my problem.avrfan wrote:see if you can figure out what kind of signal it works off from.
Both gauges already come with a pot from the factory.avrfan wrote:If its a variable dc voltage and the gauge is functioning like a voltmeter then you can add a potentiometer /variable resistor on the wire between the gauge and sending unit.
I guess you seemingly can not comprehend a full sentence.Hype wrote:Umm... did you read anything?
The deal was my existing speedo went bad and I couldnt find a replacement, so I popped in one from an SOHC. I noticed a discrepancy between the gauge faces and asked if anyone knew anything more about it. One or both of the speedos may be bogus.
Car is stock. One day the speedo worked, the next day it didnt. Also, is there any change that I could make that would cause the speedometer to register 70mph while at a stop light?
This is a foolish statement. When was the last time you calibrated your TV? Rebuilt your microwave? Yes, electronics fail (as mine did) but they cannot be recalibrated for age related wear.
Again, if you read what I posted above, you'd see that when I put the SOHC speedo in it read perfectly. In my original thread, I mentioned that the odometer is not affected, so I ruled out the vss.
Closest answer yet. It's not voltage based as it would need too large of a range. It's a frequency based system. It's fine man, the only way your gauge is going to be off is if your speed sensor is screwed, or more likely you have changed the circumference of the wheels where making it smaller will net in an odometer that reads faster than your actual speed, and larger reads slower than your actual speed.avrfan wrote:see if you can figure out what kind of signal it works off from. If its a variable dc voltage and the gauge is functioning like a voltmeter then you can add a potentiometer /variable resistor on the wire between the gauge and sending unit. Then tune it until you get the right voltage offset to set it back to an accurate speed. If the signal is a variable resistance same thing. Its just the gauge is just setup to work as a ohm meter. If however its a square wave or ac sine wave signal of varying frequency then I can't tell you an easy way to shift the frequency of the signal to calibrate your speedo. But I'm sure there's an easy way. Just first use an digital volt ohm meter and see what kind of signal is coming on the connector to your speedo. Then if its volts or ohms you know what to do. If its a varying voltage, then call an electronics shop and ask them for a simple inline device/circuit that can change the frequency with a small adjusting screw on it.
best of luck thats my idea. You seem like you would try something like that. I would probably keep hunting for the right part myself.
Dude, dont hate. I questioned whether or not you read my post because your comments missed the intent of the OP. While I appreciate your suggestion to look into the vss as a cause for an errant speedo, I had already moved past that at the time I made this thread. I just documented the differences between the gauge faces and asked if anyone knew anything more. Not looking to start any beef with you...Goldeneagle wrote:I guess you seemingly can not comprehend a full sentence.
I'm familiar with the gauge input. In fact I linked to the article describing it in detail. There was no mention of changing wheel sizes either. This is merely a comparison of the two gauge faces. Since it is known they take the same input, one of them must be off.H8tred wrote:Closest answer yet. It's not voltage based as it would need too large of a range. It's a frequency based system. It's fine man, the only way your gauge is going to be off is if your speed sensor is screwed, or more likely you have changed the circumference of the wheels where making it smaller will net in an odometer that reads faster than your actual speed, and larger reads slower than your actual speed.
To make it easier for some to under stand, the speedometer is just like an analog clock, and if you look at the back of any wall clock, there is an adjustment to correct a fast or slow clock. Electronic speed sensors are the same way, but the adjustment is with a resistor in the gauge itself.
I put an sohc gauge in a dohc b/c I couldnt find an dohc. The speed sensors are the same. I provided a link to courtesy parts.H8tred wrote:So there you have it, the gauge face has no bearing on it so long as you keep it DOHC to DOHC and SOHC to SOHC. As far as I know, the speed sensors have the same part number, though you may want to double check.
Thanks for taking the time to read my post! I know to most it seems like much ado about nothing, but I was just throwing it out there to see if anyone knew anything about it. As for the DOHC being off, who knows. It could be the SOHC thats wrong. The wheel weights however make no difference. While light wheels certainly help performance, they do not affect the gauge reading one bit. The VSS measures rotation in the transmission and rotation @ a given speed is unaffected by this. SIZE however plays a role in this. IIRC stock steelies are 14 inchers, alloys came with 195/60R15s and HICAS models roll on 205/60R15s. To my knowledge nissan made no correction to the gauge display to adjust for this, but if they have I imagine it was via the potentiometer at the back of the gauge....low91240sx wrote:Pretty intresting I'll be the first to tell you that I am NOT an elctronic man but based on the note card experiment that you did IMO it seems to me that the DOHC is off but then again I suppose you would have to factor in wheel size/weight which both are the same stock to my knowledge or if you a 240 that has rims compared to one with hub caps then obviously the weight of the wheel is different and will cause the speedometer to read wrong(correct me if I'm wrong please)
Nah I haven't replaced the sensor, but i know the sensor was good because the while the broken speedo read funky (sometimes 110+ while actual speed was more like 40 ), the odometer was unaffected. I do have a buddy with an SOHC, i'll have to get him to participate in this, haha.low91240sx wrote:and since you have replaced your speed sensor as stated above the simplest/easiest thing that I would do is if you have a buddy or own a SOHC unmoded have someone drive the SOHC and you drive the DOHC or the other way around and both of you drive until you hit 35 and stay there and see where your at and you might get your answer? Like if the SOHC was a little ways back then it's speedometer is off or the other way around if the DOHC is behind then you have your answer maybe make sure the SOHC has a new speed sensor that way you know it's accurate also this is probably an ignorant question but it shouldn't matter on the hp rating where the speedometer is right?. idk i'm just throwing in my two cents like I said I sit on the sidelines and watch when it comes to electronics but good thread for sure very very intresting
nope, my friend has an SOHC 5speed and its 115.i240sx wrote:115=auto 110=5speed..
Why? The TACH is incompatible but what drives the speedo? The VSS does, and we've covered that here.i240sx wrote:and if your going to put a sohc gauge for a dohc motor, its not going to get the same reading...
I can tell ya that it doesn't matter if it's auto/manual the gauges are the same to my knowledge and both guages are the same as stated above they are both 60mph=1024rpm so it matches right up just one of them is giving the wrong readingi240sx wrote:115=auto 110=5speed..and if your going to put a sohc gauge for a dohc motor, its not going to get the same reading...
Man you could have saved yourself a whole lot of typing. I know about the tach thing; it was brought up as a counter to some misinformation here in this thread. Also, I commented on tire sizes in my reply to low91240sx. I'm aware that tire size changes will affect the speedo.H8tred wrote:Like I said, unless you're changing just the faces between the two different models I.E; SOHC gauge face onto the DOHC gauge body, it does not matter. The sohc gauge is internally calibrated to read as true as any oem gauge can. It's plug and play. The only reason the SOHC tach wont work on a DOHC engine is because of wiring differences for the ignition.
On to the speed sensor. Wheel size will matter. As far as I know, most base model 240s were offered with 195/60-15 tires, and SEs got 205/60-15 tires. It may have been available as an option as well, I'm not really sure, and it has no bearing on the end result of the point.
Between the two assuming that Nissan did no additional calibrating, there is a difference of 2.0% larger diameter in the 205. Meaning that your speedometer is reading 60mph but your actual rate of travel is 61.2mph.
Now lets say you go from the stock 195/60-15 to 205/35-18. You now have a difference of 2.3% The 195/60-15 has a diameter of 76.1 inches, and the 205/35-18 has a diameter of 74.3 inches. The stock wheel will complete 833 full rotations in one mile, while the aftermarket wheel does 853. Your speedometer says 60mph, but your only actually going 58.6mph. Now add that on top of the accuracy of the original speedometer.
Interesting, the data scan is off from the speedo? Was this with stock tires? I dont know anyone that has a standalone gps, otherwise I'd try that... damn. Sucks about your transmission man. My clutch broke (a spring popped out of the hub) on freaking new years when I had some friends fly into town to visit me.H8tred wrote:Now in my case, I have Nissan Data scan, the original speedometer, and Iguideance GPS on the laptop. I notice at most a 1.5 mph difference between the three, granted that you can input your tire size in Datascan so the input from the speed sensor is modified. However, the gps isn't. I have had 195/60-15s, 205/60-15s, and I can't remember the tire size on the 16s, and my trans took a dump on my today, so I'm 30 miles away from my car .
The last picture in the OP shows the markings between DOHC and SOHC gauges are off. Its not simply the difference between numbering, the hash marks are just plain off. The input is the same since the speed sensor is the same. The point of this thread was to find out which one is goofed up.H8tred wrote:The sohc speedo will read just as accurate as your original granted tire size.
Everything works fine, except that it looks out of placeH8tred wrote:If it acts all retarded like the original, it's the speed sensor or a short in the wires.
I know how you feel, I've been driving my Canadian 240 so it's 180 in kilometers. I got into my 92 that I haven't driven in 6 months or more, and kept looking at the smaller numbers wigging out thinking I was going to fast.Hype wrote:Everything works fine, except that it looks out of place