I see no reason to discriminate against a hard working child for earning a merit based scholarship just because their dad is wealthy.nissangirl74 wrote:P Diddy's son won a merit-based scholarship and there are critics who are saying that he should refuse it because his dad has enough money to send him to school. What do you think? Do you think rich kids should be ineligible for scholarships just because their parents have money? That's a hell of a message to send to kids when the population is starved for motivated students / kids with work ethic.
a critic:
Here's the bottom line, says Dennis Romero in LA Weekly: "The son of a guy worth nearly half a billion dollars" doesn't need a free ride to college, especially to "a school where student tuition and fees have nearly tripled in the last 10 years." I mean, this is a kid who poses in front of "a $300,000-plus Maybach," likely the car his dad got him on his 16th birthday. Now that's "a free ride that could pay for half dozen full-ride scholarships to UCLA."
"Combs gets full scholarship to UCLA as many students struggle"
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/rich-kids ... 00285.html
I'm sorry, but I dont understand this. How could his merits be based on his father's wealth? Rich kids slide thru life all the time on the coat tails of their wealthy parents (dont finish school, never hold down a job, etc). But this kid actually has a brain in his head. Sure, Dad could afford to send him to the best schools, and hire the best tutors, and buy the best study aids. IMO, that's a worthy investment of money, as education always is. College kids dont buy books because theyre rich. They invest in learning.Loki wrote:Don't think there is a clear cut answer to that. I think the kid should only return the scholarship if his merits are a result of his father's wealth, in other words merits not possible for poorer students (personal, expensive tutors, football trainers, etc). However, I think it would be nice of Mr. Combs to set up a different merit-based scholarship at his son's school with some of his wealth (as DJBeasy alludes to). If you make that much money, there is simply no reason to not support the school in some way. I know of many Penn State alums that have done the same.
I'd even go a step further and say that failure to reward excellence is the single most dangerous mistake we can make as a society. People who have the skills to do great things but aren't empowered are a waste and a lost opportunity.AZhitman wrote:Excellence MUST be rewarded at every opportunity. Anyone who gets in the way of that has no business breathing my good goddam air.
BOOM.Jesda wrote:It's about values -- having a strong sense of obligation to family and society, placing importance on work and personal success, remaining grounded and focused, and setting goals.
Agreed.Jesda wrote: If it was a need-based scholarship, then they'd have a valid gripe.
I think we have a winner!DJBeasy wrote:Duke Puddingstain
Exactly what I was thinking. Good post!DJBeasy wrote:I would hope in most cases where a well off child earns a scholarship they accept it, and the family makes a donation or other sign of equal or greater acknowledgment on their behalf. By no means should they not accept the scholarship, it should be accepted and "paid forward". I wouldnt be suprised if the Puff Donkey has already done so in one form or another.
Merit based scholarships are intended to draw exceptional talent to the university. Need has nothing to do with it.Red coupe wrote:I've always thought of scholarships as a way of making sure that no great minds slip through the cracks because they cannot afford tuition.