in the air?SketchyRollin564 wrote:on that one show on spike they did a twin turbo rear mount on a C5
doesnt have to be in the air to work
yeahthe on the z the pipe travels along the passenger side of the car into the Fmicbjohnson wrote:that looks really cool!ive never seen that before.id say go for it.would you still use a fmic in this setup and run piping to the front of the car?
From what i have heard you don't need to run a Intercooler on them. Do them staying cooler from being under the car.bjohnson wrote:that looks really cool!ive never seen that before.id say go for it.would you still use a fmic in this setup and run piping to the front of the car?
that looks like a drag setup.so i don't think ground clearance is the biggest issueFlicktitty wrote:There is a shop in Chicago that has a SR20DET powered S13. That has a rearmount
eH just putting that out there to show it has been done. i was hoping to give you more ambition to getting it done. call them up and act as if you would take your car there pick there brain.E7-S14 wrote:
that looks like a drag setup.
the idea holds true for cars rearmount kits started on.like vettes..for lack of underhood space.. why not stick it in the back.brizanden wrote:no offense to any one who likes this idea. (and i am speaking out of complete ignorance) but isnt that a bad idea to put the turbo way in the back unless u really have to?
ugh.you missed the point.i was replying to the previous post.and int my txt i wrote"like vettes"..i wasn't talking about a 240.brizanden wrote:ur dont have enough space up front? dont you drive a 240 lmao. we have caves in the front of our cars. i would say if u can fit it up front do it
no reading is for squares.E7-S14 wrote:
ugh.you missed the point.i was replying to the previous post.and int my txt i wrote"like vettes"..i wasn't talking about a 240.
please read.