None of the state titled guys seem to like me much over there. The harsh realities of possibly getting your car seized, just don't seem to make it to them. They all seem to think that they got the car in the county, sneaked it in, they broke the law doing that, never been caught since then, they think they are golden. Some are dumb, some are just ignorant of the law.edthemanjp wrote:Ouch on harsheness but they deserve it they bashed on you enough instead of listening.
There seemed to be some finger pointing and bashing instead of focusing. I was deemed high and mighty when I told them it was unintelligent to bash Nico, especially when Nico is helping.
Your right a LOT of money is required. t cost me around 10-12k for a 6 month deal. Good thing I only paid Hiro half up front.
there are some that are like that but others, WE take this veryy seriously...tyndago wrote:None of the state titled guys seem to like me much over there. The harsh realities of possibly getting your car seized, just don't seem to make it to them. They all seem to think that they got the car in the county, sneaked it in, they broke the law doing that, never been caught since then, they think they are golden. Some are dumb, some are just ignorant of the law.edthemanjp wrote:Ouch on harsheness but they deserve it they bashed on you enough instead of listening.
There seemed to be some finger pointing and bashing instead of focusing. I was deemed high and mighty when I told them it was unintelligent to bash Nico, especially when Nico is helping.
Your right a LOT of money is required. t cost me around 10-12k for a 6 month deal. Good thing I only paid Hiro half up front.
If its a car, was sold as a car in Japan, and now in the US does not have EPA and DOT documentation, and is registered, its not legal. If they want to argue semantics of the law, they need a lawyer, and they need political clout to change the law. Not complain, not write a petition with 500 signatures on it, they need to have more political clout than the car companies. Its the OEM's that they need to go against, not the government. Why do you think the Registered Importer program came into effect? I need to write something about the history of gray market importation, and the 1980's. Its Mercedes and BMW that you need to have more political clout and money than, in order to get the laws changed.
ICE doesn't care if you did it, some other dude did it, either way, it did not enter the country legally. From what I hear, Steve is going to try and get amensty for people by turning in some of the importers. I think that will just backfire on him. They will pick up the importers, then just go though the importers records, and get all the cars titles voided, or go to the peoples houses and seize cars.
As I said, the harsh realities of it are, I am telling them what to do, and no I am not nice about it. The next guys that tell them what to do, will not only not talk nice about it, they will seize their car. No amount of 16 year old kids giving $20 is going to do much about it. It takes big kids, with big kid money to try and do something about it.
I love how people think that the laws do not apply to them. They think that because one car gets seized, they have nothing to worry about.
Its a forum of people that are led by a guy that can't take good advice. They came to see his car, and what did he do? He took it apart. If the car was not there, when they came back, they can not seize what is not there. Instead of taking it apart and losing it, if he loaned it to a friend for a road trip, they could not have seized it. Advice was given, people are too dumb to take it. Too dumb to fight, too dumb to hire a lawyer, and get advice prior to giving up there car.
Harsh, yes. Reality, yes. If you can't handle the realities of life, maybe you should give up.
You have about 20 guys. After a year of paying in with no action, it will be like the Kaizo guys. Slowly losing support. Slowly losing their core group of guys that contributed money.EL MAMITO USMC wrote: there are some that are like that but others, WE take this veryy seriously...
Who the F is bashing on us?edthemanjp wrote:There seemed to be some finger pointing and bashing instead of focusing. I was deemed high and mighty when I told them it was unintelligent to bash Nico, especially when Nico is helping.
They are bashing on me,its OK, I'm a big kid. I did all this stuff, when most of them were in grade school. They don't want the hard truth's about state titled cars. You have written about it. You have posted it up here. I call them idiots, because that is how I feel, and they get their feelings hurt.AZhitman wrote:Who the F is bashing on us?
Here's the deal - I'm not Sean Morris. I'm not Steve from SOUSA. We're neither. And if someone from EITHER side has something to say, then RIGHT HERE is the place to say it, especially if it pertains to me and my forums.
EDIT: Hey Sean - Are you talking about the Frank I think you're talking about? http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-genera ... -59.htmlIf so, f*** him.
Understood, and agreed.tyndago wrote:They don't want the hard truth's about state titled cars. You have written about it. You have posted it up here. I call them idiots, because that is how I feel, and they get their feelings hurt. I give them advice and a path, and what they are doing is not going to do much. I call people directly, on the telephone, and they don't listen. Its a whatever in the end. You can't help the ones that refuse to be helped.
Ah. The same one who thinks the people who question him are only doing it because they "can't afford" the car. Right.tyndago wrote:Yes Greg- the same Frank - celm. Same guy slanging all kinds of stuff in Florida. He says he is doing nothing wrong, but its the same broken record over and over. Another one of those guys who think their s*** don't stink.
I still think they are nearly all idiots, lead by the chief idiot. As I said before, prove me wrong. They won't be able to. They will all fail, then who will really be the idiots?Levelride wrote:t ZDayZ last may, including Steve, and they are far from idiots...
Please, if you are going to call people out, call them out individually, not at as a whole... It makes you look like an a**...
It's one thing to be the bulldog who's goal is to effectively communicate importance to others but it's another to be a loose cannon that's unprofessional and out of control. Over the past month you did nothing more then create a negative image for yourself causing everyone to view you as a child throwing a tantrum because no one was listening to your every word and you were not the one in the spot light. Make all the derogatory remarks you wish about the community, those in it and myself. It's a moot debate that no one but yourself cares about. Your attitude kept you on the outside for quite some time.tyndago wrote: Biggest hope or worst enemy.
You all just defaulted to worst enemy. Have fun. I know all the tricks. I will make sure all the ICE guys do too.
Ironicly there's a majority that view you as the chief boob within the chain of boobery around you as a former employee of a failed company. Most who own cars from that company find it "creepy" how you keep tabs on the cars and those who've owned them. But what do I know, I'm just the chief idiot.tyndago wrote: I still think they are nearly all idiots, lead by the chief idiot.
Really? Please tell me someone else (not Sean) posted that.tyndago wrote: Biggest hope or worst enemy.
You all just defaulted to worst enemy. Have fun. I know all the tricks. I will make sure all the ICE guys do too.
Nope, that was straight from his post on sousa. Kinda makes you think doesnt it? Friend or foe....AZhitman wrote:Really? Please tell me someone else (not Sean) posted that.tyndago wrote: Biggest hope or worst enemy.
You all just defaulted to worst enemy. Have fun. I know all the tricks. I will make sure all the ICE guys do too.
Really? So, am I in that boat too? Guess it's a good thing you're not peeking in MY garage.
I now know who to keep at arms' length, if that's how you roll. Hope it's a misunderstanding.
AZhitman wrote:
I'm disappointed.
It's one thing to try and give people accurate information (which we've always tried to do here).
It's quite another to interfere with their enjoyment.
Sounds like the justification people often give for violating the Fourth Amendment (and our privacy).tyndago wrote:If they did nothing wrong, they have nothing to worry about.
INTEGRITY
Definition: Integrity means that you are honest and truthful in what you say or do. You put honesty, sense of duty, and sound moral principles above all else.
LOYALTY
Definition: Loyalty means that you are devoted to your country, the Corps, and to your seniors, peers, and subordinates. The motto of our Corps is Semper Fidelis!, (Always Faithful). You owe unwavering loyalty up and down the chain of command, to seniors, subordinates, and peers.
TACT
Definition: Tact means that you can deal with people in a manner that will maintain good relations and avoid problems. It means that you are polite, calm, and firm.
DECISIVENESS
Definition: Decisiveness means that you are able to make good decisions without delay. Get all the facts and weight them against each other. By acting calmly and quickly, you should arrive at a sound decision. You announce your decisions in a clear, firm, professional manner.
INITIATIVE
Definition: Initiative is taking action even though you haven't been given orders. It means meeting new and unexpected situations with prompt action. It includes using resourcefulness to get something done without the normal material or methods being available to you.
JUDGMENT
Definition: Judgment is your ability to think about things clearly, calmly, and in an orderly fashion so that you can make good decisions.
DEPENDABILITY
Definition: Dependability means that you can be relied upon to perform your duties properly. It means that you can be trusted to complete a job. It is the willing and voluntary support of the policies and orders of the chain of command. Dependability also means consistently putting forth your best effort in an attempt to achieve the highest standards of performance.
JUSTICE
Definition: Justice is defined as the practice of being fair and consistent. A just person gives consideration to each side of a situation and bases rewards or punishments on merit.
Who gives a flying duck about you being a disabled combat vet? I did 6 years, I am a veteran. I have my DD214.VandrelSOUSA wrote:A few key items I live by as a disabled combat veteran of 9 years service to this country
Your advice was to lie to a federal agent, as a active government security clearance holder, that is something I will not do. As I stated, it's a shame that you could not conduct yourself appropriately because there are those of us who wanted to have you included in the big picture. I was very patient with you but I wasn't going to hold your hand and stop you from digging your own grave.
I'm pretty sure it's clear to everyone just whose side you clearly want to be on. Instead of helping to support the community, you decide to talk down to everyone, make threats, and tell us how we can't do it. Why don't you use that pretty mouth of yours to do something that matters, and help make it happen.tyndago wrote:Go cry the disabled combat veteran card a little more, it gets you far.
I did. I called Steve - on the tel-e- phone, when I heard that he had an issue. I gave him advice. He had the number of a good customs attorney. Instead of asking an attorneys advice, he took the car apart. Great idea.dj_kouki-monsta wrote: Why don't you use that pretty mouth of yours to do something that matters, and help make it happen.Instead of telling everyone how much experience you have in every post, how much money it's going to take that we "can't" raise, how long you've been doing things the right way, you give us the insight and help develop a plan. Anyone can stand on the corner and point fingers. It takes a bigger man to put aside the ego stroking and actually roll up his sleeves and help..