MoD and Friends: Tell me more about the Lincoln LS

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

I was pleased to learn the V8 has a 5-speed auto. It's been about eight years since I've driven an LS8 but I remember how well it handled.

Any issues with yours aside from coil packs?

Any reason to choose an LS8 over a Jaguar S-type?

Image

With my Seville some of the biggest expenses at 100k included power steering work, wheel bearings, and various wheel/tire balancing and vibration issues. I did put 40,000 miles on it though.


User avatar
frapjap
Posts: 13175
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:46 pm
Car: '99 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
'07 Subaru Legacy
Location: South Coast Massachusetts

Post

Heres something MOD wrote me back in 2010. I keep it in my PM box for reference as its one of the cars that I still like.
Hopefully he'll find it alright to repost.




As with a lot of luxury cars, reliability for the LS wasn't fantastic at first but got better over the years. More common problems include coil pack issues (all years), auto transmission problems for earlier years ('00 to '02), and a problem with power steering column self-lubrication that leads to occasional steering heaviness and weird squeaks.

My car has the steering issue. It doesn't impair driveability so I haven't fixed it due to the $250 pricetag the dealer has attached to the on-lift drain-and-fill procedure they use to fix it (basically they spend 15 minutes rapidly turning from lock to lock to force fluid into bearings, so it's hard to do on the ground). My car also has a problem with the dual zone climate control. The coolant valve that splits flow between the two heater cores failed, and one side is stuck on full heat. The part is easy to get to, though, and only about $100 from the dealer. Since it's summer, I just shoved a spring in the bad side solenoid forcing the valve closed, so now that side's A/C only.

I also have the coil pack issue. There's a seal somewhere on the coil covers that goes bad. Water gets in and rusts the valvecover bolts and kills the coilpacks. There's a TSB for this, and you can order replacement seals and do it yourself (one seal is actually for a wiper arm, as it drains right onto a valvecover).
I started noticing a rough idle, so I pulled off my passenger coil cover and sure enough the valvecover bolts were rusted. I'm still chasing down the misfire, though. After replacing a coil it has decreased but still pops up sometimes, especially after going through carwashes with underbody sprayers. I'm thinking it's actually a harness issue somewhere.

I haven't faced any squeaks or rattles aside from the steering column issue (which sounds like plastic trim rubbing on plastic trim, but isn't present all the time).

The car does have a 60/40 split folding rear seat. It has a durable backing and trunk carpeting on the backs of those seats. The trunk is pretty roomy for such a small car, even with the seats up, but is kind of shallow under the rear deck due to the trim hiding the speakers.

Moonroof (glass with sliding shade) was an option. It actually retracts into the roof, rather than popping up and sliding out like a lot of newer cars, which I like. Later years (I'm not sure for earlier years) are one-touch open and close. The really nice thing is that even with a sunroof, headroom is excellent. Being 6'4'', headroom's always a big concern with me. The LS is the only car I've ever owned (and one of the only ones I've driven period) that didn't require me to lower the seat all the way to fit comfortably.

I like the seats quite a bit...better than those in any other car I've owned. A lot of modern cars have over-aggressive lumbar bolstering for me, but I don't have that problem in the LS. I particularly like the tall headrests. Heated and cooled front seats were an option, and heated rear seats were actually an option as well.

As for Winter handling, mine has done well in the snow. If you get Advancetrac (stability control) you'll be fine. Mine had some horrible tires on it when I bought it that were scary in heavy snow, but Advancetrac made it tolerable. For the most part, in rain or snow, the car's actually fine even with Advancetrac off. I rarely leave it on, unless the weather is terrible. I believe regular traction control is standard, but Advancetrac was an option.

There were 4 trims: base, sport, Ultimate. If you get a V8, you automatically get Sport. The easiest way to tell them apart is the bumper trim. Base has chrome trim, the rest have body color trim.
Sport adds tighter suspension (which is on the "too sporty" side for most buyers and manages body roll pretty well for factory suspension), 17'' wheels (base are 16), fake aluminum interior trim (Ultimate gets woodgrain), 6-disc in-dash changer (12 speaker system), and adds the "SST" manumatic mode to the auto transmission.
I'm actually not sure what exactly the Ultimate adds, but all those things are options on Sport, so it doesn't matter much.
Options not attached to a package are things like THX Audio (which supposedly sounds fantastic) which comes with a double-DIN touchscreen headunit with GPS navigation, Advancetrac, HID, heated rear seats and adjustable rear headrests, wood trim, moonroof.
There was also an LSE package that's purely aesthetic. It replaces all chrome with body color paint and adds a different front bumper with different-looking fog lights as well as all-red tail lights for later models (which normally have clear turn signals).
Oh, my car has automatic headlights, but I'm not sure if that was an option.

The big thing to consider is the redesign for 2003. A lot of stuff was changed or improved, fixing most of the small problems the car had in the early years. The V8 also got a boost in power (from 252hp and 267 ft-lb to 280hp and 286 ft-lb), the auto trans was revised (including shift behavior), and the interior was classed up a little such as disguising dash airbag seams (though unless you get the THX audio the radio headunit still looks like something that belongs in a Taurus). Also, in 2003, the center high mount stop light moved from the parcel deck to the top of the backlight, with the ceiling trim wrapping around it. And the front bumper, tail lights and trunk trim were revised. The later models' tail lights are not as wide and have clear turn signals.
Another 2003+ change was that the manual lever-operated park brake was replaced with an electrically actuated one. It clears up center console space and actually releases itself when you put the car in gear.

There was a GETRAG 5 speed manual offered on V6 models, but only from 2000 until 2002. It was dropped in 2003 due to low sales.

FWIW, I paid $12k for my '05 V8 Sport, with Advancetrac, cooled seats, moonroof, but no HIDS (purchased from a Ford dealer).

Other useful stuff...
-The V6 is a 3 liter Duratec. The V8 is a 3.9 liter Jaguar AJ V8 (specifically, AJ30 for '00-'02 and AJ35 for '03-'06). -The V8 is derived from the 4 liter in the S-type (with which this car shares its architecture), but is a Ford-built redesign that has different heads and other changes.
-The late-model retro-looking Thunderbird is essentially just a short-wheelbase LS convertible. Basically everything about the car aside from bodywork is identical to the LS. Even the interiors are largely the same.
-Lug pattern is 5x108, shared with the Taurus and Jaguar lineup.
-Side mirrors are NON-folding. Supposedly folding mirrors were an option, but I've never actually seen it. The driver and inside mirrors are auto-dimming though. Oh, and they have neat "puddle" lights on the undersides that illuminate the ground around the car when you unlock it.
-I average 21-22mpg combined, and have managed 29 highway. Not bad.

Things I'd watch for on a test drive are the coilpack issue (will present as a chunky idle, obviously) and the power steering issue. The steering problem makes noise most often at low-speed, so try making small back-and-forth steering motions while driving in a parking lot. If it squeaks, you've got the problem; it'll sound like the column trim is misadjusted and rubbing on the wheel. I'm not sure the stiffness is so bad you'd be able to tell it from proper column operation without having both on hand to compare, though.

I would definitely recommend an '03 or later. The numerous small and big improvements make a big difference, and are worth holding out for.

Overall, I love the car. Compared to the Q (which was admittedly modified and aging) it's much cheaper to own and I spend a lot less time underneath it trying to fix stupid crap. The few problems I've had aren't nearly enough to make me not recommend the car...just keep an eye out for them and be prepared in case you get one that has them.

Oh, and as for warranty stuff...original factory warranty is only 5 years/50k miles. Ford does offer extended warranties for cars with up to 100k miles, but I'm not sure on pricing. I'm still debating whether I should buy one for my car. Hit up FLMowner.com for more info on that.

Any other questions, let me know.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Good stuff!

Looks like the only really major issue on early ones was the transmission. I know Edmunds had their valve body serviced/rebuilt under warranty when they did a long-term test back in 1999-2000.

I should have kept my Seville but jumped the gun and assumed I'd be moving for work and/or grad school by now. A couple months ago I got a text from the guy who currently owns it. He's having a good time. Grr.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

Jesda wrote:Good stuff!

Looks like the only really major issue on early ones was the transmission. I know Edmunds had their valve body serviced/rebuilt under warranty when they did a long-term test back in 1999-2000.

I should have kept my Seville but jumped the gun and assumed I'd be moving for work and/or grad school by now. A couple months ago I got a text from the guy who currently owns it. He's having a good time. Grr.
My mechanic bought qan early LS8 for his wife several years ago, I believe he still has it. (she doesn't put many miles on it). It's a pleasant, competent cruiser. He did complain about the bad transmission design, which was fixed, and the car wore thru front brake pads and tires more quickly than he preferred. but overall he's been happy with it.

To answer your question about which to buy? LS. better reliability track record than the S-type despite the similar DNA. LS: average, S-type: worse than average.

User avatar
frapjap
Posts: 13175
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:46 pm
Car: '99 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
'07 Subaru Legacy
Location: South Coast Massachusetts

Post

Ahem ::clears throat::
Image

http://stlouis.craigslist.org/cto/3108462846.html

Just do it! :dblthumb:

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Oh thats pretty

User avatar
300ZXttZMAN
Posts: 6800
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT 5spd pearl white

DD: 2008 Nissan Frontier NISMO pkg 4x4 Crew Cab
Location: Sulphur, LA 70665
Contact:

Post

I get alot of calls for the cooling fans. From 2001-02 with the V8. Just throwing that out there.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Found this interesting bit of info comparing the V6 manual to the V8 auto:

"The engine makes perfectly adequate power, with the 3.0-liter whipping up 210 peak horsepower and 205 foot-pounds of twist at 4750 rpm. However, acceleration is undistinguished, with our road test editor eking out a rather sluggish 7.8 seconds in the zero-to-60 mph acceleration run. The V8, with the automatic, was able to best that time with 7.6 seconds, while the 323i, with 40 less horsepower, gets 7.1 seconds. In terms of performance numbers, there wasn't much of a disparity between the V6 and the V8 versions of the LS."

http://www.insideline.com/lincoln/ls/20 ... ls-v6.html


I didnt realize the two were so close in acceleration (at least, up to 60mph).

With the V6 being lighter, more fuel efficient, and more balanced, it seems worth the downgrade in power.

User avatar
frapjap
Posts: 13175
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:46 pm
Car: '99 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
'07 Subaru Legacy
Location: South Coast Massachusetts

Post

You could do better acceleration (in more style) in this!
Image

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

frapjap wrote:You could do better acceleration (in more style) in this!
Image

True, but how would Jesda look with a mullet to blend in with many of the other owners? (present company excluded) :biggrin:

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

Pfff...he doesn't need a mullet, he needs to look like this!

Image

God I love that movie...they drove off in a red Firebird. Or maybe Camaro. Pretty sure it was a firebird...I'll have to watch again!

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Jesda wrote:Any issues with yours aside from coil packs?
Climate control falure (via the dual-zone coolant control valve) is common and happened to me. The part is not terribly expensive ($100-$150 depending on where you go) and is easy to replace.
I also have the power steering problem mentioned above, which is intermittent and not particularly bothersome. Steering gets heavy when the problem presents--usually at medium speeds. It's never irritatingly heavy or dangerous, just heavier than when it's working right. My understanding of the problem is that it won't degrade to complete failure, so I feel little need to fix it.
Jesda wrote:Any reason to choose an LS8 over a Jaguar S-type?
The S-type is fugly? That's the biggest thing for me. The LS is handsome and subtle, while the S-type is ugly and loud.
There's no Lincoln equivalent to the supercharged S-type R, so if you want LOTS of power, you only have one choice.
Jesda wrote:With my Seville some of the biggest expenses at 100k included power steering work, wheel bearings, and various wheel/tire balancing and vibration issues. I did put 40,000 miles on it though.
I haven't had any major or costly issues with my LS8 (knock on lots of wood) and it rolled over 80k miles a few weeks ago. The two most expensive issues I've had were coilpacks ($90 a pop, dirt cheap for coils) and the climate control valve mentioned above. Not bad at all for a sporty luxury car.
Edmunds have always been idiots, and this review is no exception. I don't know why they keep comparing the LS to the 3 series. It was designed to go after the 5 series (E39) specifically and Lincoln was very vocal about that. It's also about twice the size of a 3, so anyone with eyes should be able to figure out they're not going to weigh the same.
Jesda wrote:I didnt realize the two were so close in acceleration (at least, up to 60mph).

With the V6 being lighter, more fuel efficient, and more balanced, it seems worth the downgrade in power.
I'm not so sure those guys drove the same car I drive. Off-the-line acceleration might be on-par with the V6, but it's not off-the-line that people buy these cars for.

As I said in the Caravan review, I can pretty much put my LS8 in 5th gear and leave it there. FOREVER. Stop-and-go traffic (as long as I don't drop below 10mph, which triggers the only non-driver-initiated downshift the manual mode will do), passing on the freeway, in neighborhoods, cruising--5th gear is good for everything. I don't think the Duratec30 is capable of that. My commute involves two hills so steep that trucks end up in the right lane stuck in low gear with flashers on. My car does them in 5th without any effort at all.
In stop-and-go traffic, even with a light foot I'll accelerate faster than your average Accord driver from ~15mph--in 5th gear. But I usually just toss the shifter in 3rd (where the car won't downshift on its own for any reason) in stop-and-go traffic and enjoy ample torque without the need to shift.

First gear isn't all that short, and the car does 2nd-gear-starts in auto mode, so stoplight racing isn't any quicker with the V8. But once you're moving...the AJ35 makes torque all over the damn place. 220 ft-lb available from 2000rpm, and it climbs from there. The Duratec30 doesn't even manage 220 ft-lb at its peak output.

I despise automatic transmissions and would absoutely love a third pedal in my LS...BUT...
I've really fallen in love with the AJ35. It's a lot like the VH...very very smooth, sounds great, makes a lot of power for its size (just not by modern standards), never stops making torque but also isn't afraid of the redline. There's just no way a Duratec30 equipped car could compare. There's more to an engine than power output, and that's what makes the LS8 the one to buy.
I actually (can't believe I'm saying this) like the 5 speed auto in my LS8 just fine. The manual mode does EXACTLY what it is told. It never downshifts unless you stop. It never upshifts unless you tell it to--you can bounce off the rev limiter all day long if you're so inclined. It holds gears which makes twisties a lot more fun. Taps on the shifter don't elicit the quickest gear-changes in the world, but once you get used to the short delay you can still drive it like you would a manual. I wish it was setup for forward=downshift back=upshift though. Compared to the 5 speed manumatic in my dad's Maxima, my Lincoln's automatic is pure bliss.

You also need to keep in mind the DRAMATIC changes made in 2003 for the "2nd gen" models when reading reviews. It should be considered a completely different car. EVERYTHING was changed, some of it minor, some of it very significant. Suspension tuning was changed to keep up with the 5 series. Power output for the Duratec and the AJ were increased significantly. Lots of little cosmetic changes were made (like moving the washer nozzles to the cowl, sculpting the rear bumper to show off the exhaust tips, and getting rid of the stupid reflectors on the front bumper). The interior was revised (but still feels like a Taurus). Most of the car's reliability issues were resolved by 2003 or 2004 as well (transmission being the most noteworthy).

I've never driven a V6 LS before, but I have a hard time believing there's a noticeable difference in balance. My car feels brilliantly neutral, with a hint of understeer that could probably be solved with aftermarket swaybars. It is not a drift machine, and it's also not a pig. It goes exactly where you point it, it rotates RIGHT around the centerline, and while you can definitely get the rear end to dance, it won't do so without an invitation.
The AJ35 is a TINY aluminum V8 (the car's engine bay is miniscule and still more tightly packed than the G50's). It can't weigh significantly more than the Duratec V6.
Weight distribution for the V6 model is 50:50. For V8s it's 51:49. Most cars would KILL for either, so it's hard for me to get picky over 1%.

If you DO buy a V6 LS, keep in mind that they were offered in Base and Sport packages. The V8 only came in Sport guise. So if you want comparable sportiness out of a V6, you'll need to find a Sport model. You can tell easily which you're looking at: base models have chrome bumper trim while Sport models do not (and this is true for all model years).

What it comes down to for me is this:
The manual was only offered from 2000-2002 on the V6, which means NONE of the manual LSs out there are 2nd gen. So the manual is a non-issue. If you get an '03+ V6, it has the same automatic as the V8. And since the 2nd gen is ABSOLUTELY superior in every way EXCEPT the manual transmission, that's the LS you want. So just get a V8 and call it a day.

User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

Mr1der wrote:Pfff...he doesn't need a mullet, he needs to look like this!

Image

God I love that movie...they drove off in a red Firebird. Or maybe Camaro. Pretty sure it was a firebird...I'll have to watch again!
definitely a t/a.


Return to “General Chat”