Post by
biosehnsucht »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/biosehnsucht-u13953.html
Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:08 am
For the longest time, the belief that a KA-E MAF was as good as a CA MAF has been passed on from CA enthusiast to CA enthusiast, and perhaps in the general case nobody noticed any different (running too rich from overrunning the old tired stock FPR, or whatever else masking the issue.. leaking injectors etc).
However - the voltage to airflow curves are not the same! Yes, the both peak out at 190ish HP of airflow, but as you can see they are not the same :
This results in the combination of a KA MAF on a stock CA ECU (or a modified one where a stock CA MAF VQ table is still in use) creating a lean condition, always. Starts off just a fraction of a %, but quickly goes into several percent and towards the top end as much as 20% difference !
I copied the KA24E's VQ table out and then stuck it in the CA rom, and lo and behold! It runs so beautifully now. I used a hex editor to extract the data and save it as a Rom Editor style .bin file (like the other VQ .bins it comes with). Since you can't add new MAF types to RomEdit I just renamed one (in my case ps13_vq_map.bin) and then copied the KA24E one in its place, then used Rom Editor's built in MAF replace function.
Here is the KA24E MAF VQ map: hs13_vq_map.bin
I'm not posting a ready made ECU rom yet because I've not had the time to cook generic ones, I've just got my current DSM 450cc + KA MAF + etc bin.