I have a 91 300zx non-turbo>> HOW CAN I MAKE IT FASTER?!

The Nissan 300ZX (Z32) general community discussion forum
RJTHEGENERAL
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:33 pm
Car: 1991 nissan 300zx

Post

i did a JDM swap, cold air intake and greddy exhaust!What other modifications can i do for Horsepower?

thanks


makaofox
Posts: 240
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 12:35 pm
Car: 1991 nissan 300zx coupe TT
Location: Hillside, New Jersey

Post

first off welcome to nico, but if serious gain turboing it is your best bet as for the little things mayb an upgraded ecu, headers, and stuff of that nature. turboing it gives a great deal of gain an flexibility to how much power you really want.

RJTHEGENERAL
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:33 pm
Car: 1991 nissan 300zx

Post

i shouldve just went tt,,but didnt have the money!suxxxIf i turbo it i gotta change alot of parts.., pistons,etc....

User avatar
Weber3211
Posts: 1641
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:48 am
Car: 1991 Nissan 300zx

Post

you need a huge spoiler, spinners, fire extinguisher, gauges, stickers, rimz, and a body kit.

or you could buy a TT. NA's are slow. I know, i have one.

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

You could swap in a V8. VH45DE or LSx. About the same price as a TT swap, I believe...

User avatar
andrez
Posts: 183
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:16 am
Car: 1990 300zx na / 1995 f-150 4x4 / 05 focus xr4 99 blazer s-10 jacked

Post

welcome to the forum....... there is not that much horse power to gain in an n/a z versus the monies that you would have to put out ....try removing some weight like a pulley kit , junk in the trunk etc....is this a daily driver or did you buy it for hauling-a**

RJTHEGENERAL
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:33 pm
Car: 1991 nissan 300zx

Post

underdrive pulley right?

RJTHEGENERAL
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:33 pm
Car: 1991 nissan 300zx

Post

where do i find upgraded cpu?

User avatar
jedijeff123
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:14 pm
Car: 1993 Ultra Red 300ZX N/A 2+2(SOLD), 1990 Aztec Red 300ZX Twin Turbo(Temporarily providing a home for a VH45DE)
Location: San Antonio, TX

Post

Z1 Motorsports and CPZ are the best places for Z32 parts.

User avatar
intermilanrox
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:46 pm
Car: 1995 300zx 2+2

Post

simmode1 wrote:You could swap in a V8. VH45DE or LSx. About the same price as a TT swap, I believe...
Not sure on pricing, I know that they are pretty similar in price, but not positive. But I do know that the LSx engines are quite powerful and extremely reliable.

I plan on LS swapping my 2+2 eventually. Can't wait

User avatar
franklin93zx
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Car: 1993 nissan 300zx non turbo
Contact:

Post

Well you have a na z correct.. and you are looking for more POWER..... hhhhmmmmmm well first you could use the search cause this is the most frequently asked question. Then you will realize modding a na will get you to about 220hp max after spending about over 3grand. read honads thread.. zer...age=1

sethhatfield
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 5:31 am
Car: 1995 300ZX TT

Post

Why don't you put a wet nitrous oxide kit on it? It doesn't have to be more than a 50 shot. You could install it in an afternoon.

User avatar
xclusivez32
Posts: 316
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:52 am
Car: 1990 300zx 2 seater limo
tt engine build
2004 gmc serria
Location: Troy, NY

Post

dont flame me for this as i have never driven my car before. is an N/A really that slow? i mean it is a v6. i dont under stand why everyone says they are slow. a slow car to me would be a honda civic or something or that sort that people think are fast but obv arent at all. (unless heavily modded)

User avatar
franklin93zx
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Car: 1993 nissan 300zx non turbo
Contact:

Post

The reason I am flaming you is because this question is asked atleast 3 times a week and it's not hard to just read through some threads to see what are the correct things to do and i did help you by giving you the link to honads thread. He has all the bolt-on mods except the drive shaft so start reading.

User avatar
evildky
Posts: 14713
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 9:23 pm
Car: 71 240ZT, 87 300ZXN/A-T, 06 350Z GT, Tundra TRD RW
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Post

read honads thread, if thats nto enough, sell ti and buy a TT

User avatar
NolimitZ32
Posts: 7112
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:07 am
Car: 91 AG2 2+0 TTMT swap/E39 BMW 540i6/E53 4.6is Dinan S3
Location: Houston, TX

Post

xclusivez32 wrote:dont flame me for this as i have never driven my car before. is an N/A really that slow? i mean it is a v6. i dont under stand why everyone says they are slow. a slow car to me would be a honda civic or something or that sort that people think are fast but obv arent at all. (unless heavily modded)
A B16 CRX will SMOKE a stock NA Z, been there, by the time I hit 3rd he was like 5 cars ahead. Yes NAs are that slow.

User avatar
JDMZ32
Posts: 3222
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:30 am
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX, NA, slicktop, 5-speed, red
Location: Auburn University, AL
Contact:

Post

RJTHEGENERAL wrote:where do i find upgraded cpu?





User avatar
xclusivez32
Posts: 316
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:52 am
Car: 1990 300zx 2 seater limo
tt engine build
2004 gmc serria
Location: Troy, NY

Post

NolimitZ32 wrote:
A B16 CRX will SMOKE a stock NA Z, been there, by the time I hit 3rd he was like 5 cars ahead. Yes NAs are that slow.
now i have a hard time believing that, i have owned a crx and they are really slow. maybe its drivers ability just my opinion (praying my cars not that slow after all the work and money i put into it)

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

xclusivez32 wrote:now i have a hard time believing that, i have owned a crx and they are really slow. maybe its drivers ability just my opinion (praying my cars not that slow after all the work and money i put into it)
You must be joking. A stock 91hp CRX is a far cry from a b16 swapped 160hp CRX(which would be bound to have additional power adders as well). It wieghs like... almost 1200lbs less than a Z32. Power to wieight ratio is a strong weapon, my friend.

User avatar
NolimitZ32
Posts: 7112
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:07 am
Car: 91 AG2 2+0 TTMT swap/E39 BMW 540i6/E53 4.6is Dinan S3
Location: Houston, TX

Post

xclusivez32 wrote:
now i have a hard time believing that, i have owned a crx and they are really slow. maybe its drivers ability just my opinion (praying my cars not that slow after all the work and money i put into it)
If your comparing a stock CRX to a B16 CRX (as in Si B16 swap) then you really really need to do your research, I'm not the best driver but I know how to launch and shift my cars.

Stock 1999 Civic Si 0-60mph 7.2 secondsStock 1993 300zx 0-60mph (can't find exact but as far as I know its mid to low 7 sec)

Now take the B16 out of a 2600lb car and stick it in a half gutted CRX, it'll be faster

as far as pulling me, I'm sure he had some bolt-ons but the fact of the matter is that when that happened I firmly decided that my Z would become TT.

The NA is an awsome car and every time you step on it you know that 2 NAs could rip a CRX in two halves if you did a tractorpull but its just a pig @ 3300lbs.

To get back on topic, believe me when I and everyone else says, if you want NA power you need a VQ or a V8, but if you want easily swapable power go for the TT.

User avatar
JDMZ32
Posts: 3222
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:30 am
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX, NA, slicktop, 5-speed, red
Location: Auburn University, AL
Contact:

Post

xclusivez32 wrote:idk if that was directed at me or not. if it was read slow and careful (if not disregaurd my comment) does anyone have a good comparision? i have driven a v6 3000gt is that about the power? im just trying to understand what i can expect from this car.

by the way a crx stock comes with a sohc 1.5 liter as someone said maybe 91hp if your lucky
1. I think he was addressing you because we assume your CRX wasn't B16 swapped, so it's not quite the same thing as what the other guy was talking about.

2. V6 3000GT? I'd like to see one that isn't lol. You must've meant "NA".

User avatar
NolimitZ32
Posts: 7112
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:07 am
Car: 91 AG2 2+0 TTMT swap/E39 BMW 540i6/E53 4.6is Dinan S3
Location: Houston, TX

Post

1) My original post says "B16 CRX" that is the only statement I was making.2) A stock 300zx NA 0-60 is 7.5 as far as I have found.

and xclusivez32: a NA 300zx is a little faster then a NA 3000gt, my buddy had one and we lined up more then a few times, that thing couldn't keep up they weigh a little more (a couple hundred pounds) but I guess the FWD just blows goats. In short, you remember driving that 3000gt, well the 300zx is gonna be world better.

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

NolimitZ32 wrote:If your comparing a stock CRX to a B16 CRX (as in Si B16 swap) then you really really need to do your research,

Now take the B16 out of a 2600lb car and stick it in a half gutted CRX, it'll be faster
JDMZ32 wrote:1. I think he was addressing you because we assume your CRX wasn't B16 swapped, so it's not quite the same thing as what the other guy was talking about.
Precisely what I was saying.

User avatar
franklin93zx
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Car: 1993 nissan 300zx non turbo
Contact:

Post

Can we get a mod in here

pablo2983
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:43 am
Car: 300zx na
Contact:

Post

I have a 1990 300zx na. Theres not much power there, u'll have to spend as Ived come to find out at least 4k to bring it to a decent performance. Im saving to buy a tt cause the stock na is 7.2sec in 0-60 as reported on da speed channel. Hooking up a na is just to much money and work with little boost

User avatar
andrez
Posts: 183
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:16 am
Car: 1990 300zx na / 1995 f-150 4x4 / 05 focus xr4 99 blazer s-10 jacked

Post

theres a z with a vette engine for sale in this forum ............i think theres all the power you need

dozug
Posts: 1115
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 2:43 pm
Car: 300zx Twin Turbo

Post

wow, i didnt know everyone thought NA is slow.. I thought it is good enough for just cruising... haha anyways, i have TT, and if you want more power, just get a TT.

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

dozug wrote:wow, i didnt know everyone thought NA is slow..
Yeah, its slow. Not as slow as a stock KA, though

User avatar
djdopamine
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:35 am
Car: 1990 300ZX N/A 1990 300ZXTT R.I.P.

Post

xclusivez32 wrote:dont flame me for this as i have never driven my car before. is an N/A really that slow? i mean it is a v6. i dont under stand why everyone says they are slow. a slow car to me would be a honda civic or something or that sort that people think are fast but obv arent at all. (unless heavily modded)
They are slow because they weigh so much. 222hp isn't too shabby in a lighter car. That's probably the biggest reason.

User avatar
djdopamine
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:35 am
Car: 1990 300ZX N/A 1990 300ZXTT R.I.P.

Post

simmode1 wrote:
You must be joking. A stock 91hp CRX is a far cry from a b16 swapped 160hp CRX(which would be bound to have additional power adders as well). It wieghs like... almost 1200lbs less than a Z32. Power to wieight ratio is a strong weapon, my friend.
"VTEC...sometimes you need a catchy word to let the world know your car dosen't make power until 5000 rpm..."


Return to “300ZX (Z32) General”