Not sure on pricing, I know that they are pretty similar in price, but not positive. But I do know that the LSx engines are quite powerful and extremely reliable.simmode1 wrote:You could swap in a V8. VH45DE or LSx. About the same price as a TT swap, I believe...
A B16 CRX will SMOKE a stock NA Z, been there, by the time I hit 3rd he was like 5 cars ahead. Yes NAs are that slow.xclusivez32 wrote:dont flame me for this as i have never driven my car before. is an N/A really that slow? i mean it is a v6. i dont under stand why everyone says they are slow. a slow car to me would be a honda civic or something or that sort that people think are fast but obv arent at all. (unless heavily modded)
RJTHEGENERAL wrote:where do i find upgraded cpu?
now i have a hard time believing that, i have owned a crx and they are really slow. maybe its drivers ability just my opinion (praying my cars not that slow after all the work and money i put into it)NolimitZ32 wrote:
A B16 CRX will SMOKE a stock NA Z, been there, by the time I hit 3rd he was like 5 cars ahead. Yes NAs are that slow.
You must be joking. A stock 91hp CRX is a far cry from a b16 swapped 160hp CRX(which would be bound to have additional power adders as well). It wieghs like... almost 1200lbs less than a Z32. Power to wieight ratio is a strong weapon, my friend.xclusivez32 wrote:now i have a hard time believing that, i have owned a crx and they are really slow. maybe its drivers ability just my opinion (praying my cars not that slow after all the work and money i put into it)
If your comparing a stock CRX to a B16 CRX (as in Si B16 swap) then you really really need to do your research, I'm not the best driver but I know how to launch and shift my cars.xclusivez32 wrote:
now i have a hard time believing that, i have owned a crx and they are really slow. maybe its drivers ability just my opinion (praying my cars not that slow after all the work and money i put into it)
1. I think he was addressing you because we assume your CRX wasn't B16 swapped, so it's not quite the same thing as what the other guy was talking about.xclusivez32 wrote:idk if that was directed at me or not. if it was read slow and careful (if not disregaurd my comment) does anyone have a good comparision? i have driven a v6 3000gt is that about the power? im just trying to understand what i can expect from this car.
by the way a crx stock comes with a sohc 1.5 liter as someone said maybe 91hp if your lucky
NolimitZ32 wrote:If your comparing a stock CRX to a B16 CRX (as in Si B16 swap) then you really really need to do your research,
Now take the B16 out of a 2600lb car and stick it in a half gutted CRX, it'll be faster
Precisely what I was saying.JDMZ32 wrote:1. I think he was addressing you because we assume your CRX wasn't B16 swapped, so it's not quite the same thing as what the other guy was talking about.
Yeah, its slow. Not as slow as a stock KA, thoughdozug wrote:wow, i didnt know everyone thought NA is slow..
They are slow because they weigh so much. 222hp isn't too shabby in a lighter car. That's probably the biggest reason.xclusivez32 wrote:dont flame me for this as i have never driven my car before. is an N/A really that slow? i mean it is a v6. i dont under stand why everyone says they are slow. a slow car to me would be a honda civic or something or that sort that people think are fast but obv arent at all. (unless heavily modded)
"VTEC...sometimes you need a catchy word to let the world know your car dosen't make power until 5000 rpm..."simmode1 wrote:
You must be joking. A stock 91hp CRX is a far cry from a b16 swapped 160hp CRX(which would be bound to have additional power adders as well). It wieghs like... almost 1200lbs less than a Z32. Power to wieight ratio is a strong weapon, my friend.