AZhitman wrote:I'm pretty sure, having driven several R35's, that the thinking is this:
When any driver can shift as quickly and intuitively as the computer, they'll put a manual in it.
Until then, it'd just be something to slow down lap times.
Definitely need to drive one to understand.
Agree. I've driven flappy paddle shift cars too. I do understand Nissan's thinking, but I'm one of the minority that sees that that technology reducing lap times significantly, but does so at the expense of fun for a seasoned driver. And fun is something that can't be measured in dollars. And while Nissan has done a good job keeping their technological terror GT-R at a somewhat reasonable purchase price compard to its competition, its complexity makes it much more pricey to maintain/repair, putting it out of reach for mny potential owners..
To me, it seems Nissan is only interested in keeping the GT-R as low priced, limited production Halo vehicle. If they were interested in expnding their GT-R sales, I think Nssan's missing the boat without a manual. A big demographic of seasoned financially comfortable drivers that like manuals(ie baby boomers), are the ones scooping up Audi R8's. Audi offers them both ways and they both sell well.
.