Post by
kerrton »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/kerrton-u88348.html
Mon May 26, 2014 10:12 am
I hate to bring this up and rain on the enthusiasm some may have for this affordable 7 passenger vehicle (I'm in the same boat, I have a 6 yr old and 3 yrs old and am still searching for an affordable 7 pass crossover option).
The real problem I have with the 3rd row seat, beyond it's obvious shortcomings with space and access, is safety. Side curtain air bags are not provided for the 3rd row, only for the first two rows. And that 3rd seat is very close to the back hatch/bumper area, in the event of a rear-end crash I'd be very concerned about my 3rd row passengers, especially considering they are my most valuable family members. I don't think 3rd row safety is evaluated in crash tests...yet, this could change in the coming years, potentially exposing some serious safety risks. Other vechiles that have the 3rd row option have the same lack of 3rd row safety, including the Kia Sorento, and even the long wheelbase Hyundai Santa Fe.
In contrast, the standard 7-8 passenger crossovers such as the Nissan Pathfinder, Honda Pilot, Toyota Highlander, Ford Flex, Chev Traverse etc. all have full 3-row side curtain air bags and much more cargo room behind the 3rd row, i.e. more structure to absorb a rear impact, with little heads farther away from the back hatch glass.
For short trips the risk might be ok, but if you're transporting your little people in the 3rd row often I don't think the safety compromise is worth it. They either need to do their best with these 3rd rows, or don't do it at all, in my opinion.
My advice, rathe than purchasing a new Rogue with ineffective and unsafe 3rd row, take that same cash value and buy a used Highlander for example. It's a good medium size, slightly larger than a Rogue, but not as large as a Chev Traverse or Ford Flex. Just an alternate plan to consider.